one for the freedom riders.

TN
_________________________________________________________________
Court rules Myrtle Beach helmet law unconstitutional
Posted: Jun 08, 2010 10:01 AM Tuesday, June 8, 2010 10:01 AM EST Updated: Jun 08, 2010 11:09 AM Tuesday, June 8, 2010 11:09 AM EST
COLUMBIA, SC (WMBF) - The South Carolina Supreme Court has ruled that Myrtle Beach's law requiring motorcyclists to wear a helmet is unconstitutional.
The lawsuit was filed in April 2009 by Business Owners Organized to Save Tourism (BOOST) and Bart Viers after the city enacted the helmet law in 2008, requiring DOT-approved helmets for all riders in city limits. Under South Carolina law, anyone over the age of 21 is not required to wear a helmet.
The lawsuit argued the law, which required motorcycle riders to wear helmets in the city limits of Myrtle Beach, was unconstitutional because it preempted state law.
"Were local authorities allowed to enforce individual helmet ordinances, riders would need to familiarize themselves with the various ordinances in advance of a trip, so as to ensure compliance," the decision stated. "Riders opting not to wear helmets or eyewear in other areas of the state would be obliged to carry the equipment with them if they intended to pass through a city with a helmet ordinance."
The court added that local authorities might enact ordinances imposing additional and even conflicting equipment requirements, and such laws would unduly limit a citizen's freedom of movement throughout the state.
"We find that the City Helmet Ordinance fails under implied field preemption due to the need for statewide uniformity and therefore issue a declaratory judgment invalidating the ordinance," the judgement concluded.