Not that I'm supporting them at all, but where did you see that? BP just reported a decline in profits today and Shell and Exxon don't release results until tomorrow.
Yup, thanks to many things, such as trashing the Gulf and being forced to curtail drilling for a short time, BP's profits did not follow the lead of Exxon. Not that they lost money, they just didn't make as much because they produced less crude oil. The lower production offset part of the unjustified easy profits they realized on the bogus run-up in oil prices. The refineries are running at less than 80% of capacity btw, so obviously demand isn't driving prices.
As for the regulated utilities approach mentioned by BB, that only works if we actually control the supply. Since we import a large amount of our oil, I'm not sure how that would fit with a regulated utility approach. Would Uncle buy all the oil from all sources and then set prices? Would it work like most utilities these days, with a big loophole where the utilities get a passthrough for increased costs of the commodity and the only part of the price that's really controlled is the part they get for distribution and profit? I don't see that helping.
Put the current situation in perspective with your calculator and your own personal numbers. Over the past year prices at the pump have risen approximately $1.00 so far. The average American drives about 15,000 miles, and let's say that the average mpg is about 20. So that average American is paying about $750 more on an annualized basis this year compared to last year (feel free to substitute your own numbers for miles and mpg). Take all the hysteria generated by all the media hype out of the equation, and I submit that the average American family can find more than $750 in annual savings to offset that increase in fuel costs. I know some folks who spend that much at Starbucks for pete's sake. My point being, yes it's inconvenient and unfair, but it's not the end of life as we know it.
Jerry