Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 54

Author Topic: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR  (Read 153707 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

FLTRI

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 418
Re: Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #555 on: August 12, 2013, 08:55:34 PM »

Or to cold for some reason.
:2vrolijk_21: too cold from too rich and, I believe, too lean due to lack of fuel so no burn.
Bob
Logged

hogasm

  • Guest
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #556 on: August 13, 2013, 03:28:49 PM »

Bob I sent you a email with 2 data logs. Not in the correct format to post here
Logged

whittlebeast

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 269
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #557 on: August 13, 2013, 04:11:40 PM »

I find it interesting that there is the correct format for here?

Andy
Logged

joe_lyons50023

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 179
Re: Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #558 on: August 14, 2013, 10:23:47 AM »

I thought you could post just about any file format?
Logged

hrdtail78

  • Vendor
  • Elite CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 762
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #559 on: August 14, 2013, 11:53:07 AM »

You can't post a DM3 file.  Real easy to check.  Hit reply and try to post a DM3 and see what the pop up says. 
Logged

whittlebeast

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 269
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #560 on: August 14, 2013, 12:14:08 PM »

You can't post a DM3 file.  Real easy to check.  Hit reply and try to post a DM3 and see what the pop up says. 

The typical work around is change the file type to *.doc and post away.  Just tell people to change the file type back to *.DM3 after downloading the file.

Andy
Logged

Buckeye_Tuning

  • Mister Dick
  • Banned
  • Full CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 198
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #561 on: August 14, 2013, 02:50:02 PM »

It's way easier for folks to open a BoxNet account.  Upload tuning files to that box net account and then, in posts, to give the link for the files.  This is the 'defacto' method for posting tuning files everywhere, so that we do not have to depend on individual sites to have it 'right' or not.

I myself, do NOT like renaming files with different extensions.  But... thats just me being lovable me! :cherry:
Logged
Never Ever Forget; Never Ever Forgive

whittlebeast

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 269
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #562 on: August 14, 2013, 03:05:42 PM »

Do you realize that the reason those type sites exist is to sell your email to as many people as they can?
Logged

Buckeye_Tuning

  • Mister Dick
  • Banned
  • Full CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 198
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #563 on: August 14, 2013, 03:54:17 PM »

Yes I do, and I also am on Verizon, and they constantly listen to me talking to terrorists, Andy.  Box Net seems to be the best of the bunch and my spam filters work pretty decently.
Logged
Never Ever Forget; Never Ever Forgive

FLTRI

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 418
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #564 on: August 14, 2013, 04:48:33 PM »

Do you realize that the reason those type sites exist is to sell your email to as many people as they can?
I'm with John. I don't care about them selling my email...that's what gmail's for right?
Bob
Logged

hrdtail78

  • Vendor
  • Elite CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 762
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #565 on: August 14, 2013, 10:39:33 PM »

Anything to deter from using narrow bands at WOT huh Andy?
Logged

whittlebeast

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 269
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #566 on: August 15, 2013, 09:47:53 AM »

Avoiding washing out the rings and the desire to not melt down someones motor keeps me doing it.  But that is just me.....

Andy
Logged

FLTRI

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 418
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #567 on: August 15, 2013, 10:32:25 AM »

Avoiding washing out the rings and the desire to not melt down someones motor keeps me doing it.  But that is just me.....

Andy
So you've deemed using NBO2 sensors for WOT tuning causes overly rich or overly lean running bikes?
Bob
Logged

hrdtail78

  • Vendor
  • Elite CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 762
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #568 on: August 15, 2013, 10:52:17 AM »

Avoiding washing out the rings and the desire to not melt down someones motor keeps me doing it.  But that is just me.....

Andy

To collect data so we can use RPMxMAP/1000 vs Duty Cycle.  We need to run the engine in the condition it is in.  Washing rings or burning it up.  Right?
Logged

whittlebeast

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 269
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #569 on: August 15, 2013, 12:02:04 PM »

To collect data so we can use RPMxMAP/1000 vs Duty Cycle.  We need to run the engine in the condition it is in.  Washing rings or burning it up.  Right?

Try it with whatever tune you want.

Note that the formula is RPMxMAP/100  The 100 just makes it read nearly the same as RPM at WOT. 

Andy
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 54
 

Page created in 0.218 seconds with 20 queries.