Hey Fish,
Looks great. You have been very busy on your bike..
Did you install the HD Extended Reach Forward Control kit (9171-08 Chrome) and extended reach rear brake line kit (44970-07) ?
Do you think the original shift linkage could have been adjusted to fit the extended reach setup? I notice you installed a Dyna shift linkage..
How do you find the extra reach compared to the stock fit?
Yep, I used the HD kit. It was more expensive to go with the HD parts, but IMHO, the end result it better than using the Ness plates. The solid chrome brackets look right at home on this bike.
Here are the part numbers I used:
49171-08 KIT, EXTENDED REACH FWD CONTROL, CHROME
44972-08 KIT, BRAKELINE EXT REACH FWD CTRL/CHRM
41777-05A KIT MSTR CYL,RR/CHRM-DOT4/TOURING
33761-09 KIT, SHIFT LINKAGE, SLOTTED B&S, DYNA
There is no way that you could use the stock shift linkage and have it look nice. I know there are threaded extensions available, but I really thought that the function would have ruined form on those. FWIW, the extended control kit comes with a longer shift linkage, but it's just a plain round rod, not even chrome. You need to remove the ends (heim joints) from your stock linkage and add it to the supplied piece.
The Dyna linkage is a perfect fit, so any linkage for a Dyna would work. You'll notice that I changed my brake and shift levers to the slotted type, so the slotted linkage was an obvious choice to match.
The brakeline from HD fits perfectly too, and it's a nice touch that it's chrome finished braided line too. There's no choice in finish that I'm aware of, but with all the chrome on our bike already, it fits well.
Something you don't need to do, is replace the rear brake master cylinder. My thoughts though were that if you're going to hang that thing 3" further forward and away from the frame and its natural surroundings, it needs to look good. So, I replaced it with a chrome version, and it's completely blended in now, and looks great when you actually notice it.
As for the fit and feel of the extended controls...I was unsure at first. I'm about 5'10", with a 30"-31" inseam. The controls allow me to have my left almost completely straight, but I still have a small bend in my knees. It's a great fit. I can still kick my feet over the pegs if I want to, and rest my heels on them. I'm not straining to reach the controls either. Having ridden several miles with them now, I know I could not be comfortable on this bike without them. When I bought the bike, I rode home approximately 1250 miles over two days. With the stock mounts, my knees were bent in such a way that it was really uncomfortable, and almost painful after some time in the saddle. That's gone now.
One thing - the pegs. The stock rider pegs have an 'L' shaped mounting peg, if you will. See the pictures below. Because of this, the peg is another 1" forward/downward. The passenger pegs, which I've actually removed, have a straight peg mount. If I wanted to bring the pegs 1" closer, I could simply switch pegs.
If you still run passenger pegs and want to get a straight peg mount for the front pegs for the rider, I suppose you could switch the peg mounts inside the pegs.
The part number for that would be: (it's the passenger peg mount/support)
50258-03 MOUNT, FOOTPEG SUPPORT
Here are some pictures of the mounts/controls. When I was considering these, I had a hard time finding much information on them. Hopefully they help you out!
Notice the 'L' shaped mount on the peg itself.


