Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[porthole]

Anyone here who had - has a Rodgers oil temp gauge installed and replaced it with the HD gauge (CVO silver)?

Wondering if the sender and wiring can be used and if it will drive the HD gauge.

[Twolanerider]

Anyone here who had - has a Rodgers oil temp gauge installed and replaced it with the HD gauge (CVO silver)?

Wondering if the sender and wiring can be used and if it will drive the HD gauge.

Duane, do you mean the gauge that was offered by Roger (Rodger?) McEwan?  That's the only other oil temp gauge I remember.

It was first released by him after a long wait and many promises.  Promises that included being a "good visual match."  Trouble was it wasn't.  Not very close at all actually.  Of the few he got out in the field I kept track of four that failed also.  Not too long after the phones stopped being answered and the business closed.

[porthole]

Duane, do you mean the gauge that was offered by Roger (Rodger?) McEwan?  That's the only other oil temp gauge I remember.

Forgot the name, yes the McEwan gauge.

Mine works OK, just constantly fogs up. Since the knucklehead no longer is around I have considered replacing it with the almost made to match HD version, just wondering if I can use my McEwan sending unit and it's current placement with the HD gauge.

Don, also have to q's in the twin cam section if you care to take a gander and reply.

http://www.cvoharley.com/smf/index.php?topic=25698.0

http://www.cvoharley.com/smf/index.php?topic=25702.0

[Twolanerider]

Forgot the name, yes the McEwan gauge.

Mine works OK, just constantly fogs up. Since the knucklehead no longer is around I have considered replacing it with the almost made to match HD version, just wondering if I can use my McEwan sending unit and it's current placement with the HD gauge.

Where is your sending unit currently mounted Duane?  And what size pipe thread is it?

The fitting supplied with the HD gauge is 1/8.  Sending units might be the same; and might not.  If yours is a major pain in the ass to change you're not going to hurt anything by trying it.  If it's accurate; great.  If not, change it at your next oil change.

[Twolanerider]

Don, also have to q's in the twin cam section if you care to take a gander and reply.

http://www.cvoharley.com/smf/index.php?topic=25698.0

http://www.cvoharley.com/smf/index.php?topic=25702.0

Just looked at each.  Hope any of that was helpful .

[porthole]

Where is your sending unit currently mounted Duane?  And what size pipe thread is it?

In the pan just below the cat, it is the sending unit supplied with McEwans gauge.

[Twolanerider]

In the pan just below the cat, it is the sending unit supplied with McEwans gauge.

That being so make the whole thing an easy choice.  Wait to change gauge for whenever the next oil change is necessary.  Then pop the fairing and change the sending unit at the same time so you neither ever have to worry about the accuracy nor waste the oil.

I've got a gauge sitting here for the Road Glide.  It'll keep right on setting until whenever the bike needs an oil change.  The red bike's little engine glitch notwithstanding I really try hard not to do things twice .

[REGGAB]

Duane, do you mean the gauge that was offered by Roger (Rodger?) McEwan?  That's the only other oil temp gauge I remember.

It was first released by him after a long wait and many promises.  Promises that included being a "good visual match."  Trouble was it wasn't.  Not very close at all actually.  Of the few he got out in the field I kept track of four that failed also.  Not too long after the phones stopped being answered and the business closed.

Well, this certainly isn't at all encouraging.  Rod put one of these in the green bike during the engine build.........and it is not at all a good match.  Appears to be working fine tho'.....for now.  We'll see how this goes, and if need be, it'll get replaced with whatever is available.

One thing I do like is it is right there in front of me.  No more of this leaning over to the right, contorting my torso to press a button on a dipstick meter that only worked occasionally anyway...........and that had to be clamped in place so it wouldn't blow out.  Really diggin' the oil fill spout that came with my Baker OD6..........and my Baker OD6.  Makes a huge difference.

[igofar]

If I recall correctly, the McEwan sending unit is one wire where the HD unit is two wires.....
Easy enough to retrofit but not a direct replacement.

Brad

[REGGAB]

If I recall correctly, the McEwan sending unit is one wire where the HD unit is two wires.....
Easy enough to retrofit but not a direct replacement.

Brad

The McEwan sending unit is one wire.  Can't speak to the HD unit.

[Twolanerider]

The McEwan sending unit is one wire.  Can't speak to the HD unit.

It's separate leads for signal and ground.

[REGGAB]

It's separate leads for signal and ground.

Does the HD sending unit mount in the oil pan like the McEwan sending unit?  If so, and should it become necessary, would it be feasible to retrofit by running the ground wire to frame from both the HD sending unit and HD gauge, thus saving the signal wire and the trouble of routing it again...........or would that be too dirty?

[Twolanerider]

Does the HD sending unit mount in the oil pan like the McEwan sending unit?  If so, and should it become necessary, would it be feasible to retrofit by running the ground wire to frame from both the HD sending unit and HD gauge, thus saving the signal wire and the trouble of routing it again...........or would that be too dirty?

Henry, the spec sheets provided with the HD gauges do not put the sending unit in the pan.  Instead placing it in any of several different locations on different year/model bikes.  None of those locations are as effective or as easy as putting them in the pan.  And that's what many here have done.

The HD spec sheet also has a much busier new harness than is necessary if you're replacing a pre-existing rain gauge.  The new install specifies routing to the fuse panel for power, to the newly installed sending unit and on to the instrument in three legs off the supplied harness.  Humbug. 

At the existing gauge there's already power and ground for instrument and light.  So all that is needed is the signal from the sending unit.  You could take out the single wire sender, put in a two wire sender, use the signal wire and simply add a ground.  Would work just fine.

You'll snip the terminal or socket (whichever it has) off the end of the old signal wire to use the two wire socket matching the new sending unit.  Then just take its ground side to a good ground. 

[REGGAB]

Henry, the spec sheets provided with the HD gauges do not put the sending unit in the pan.  Instead placing it in any of several different locations on different year/model bikes.  None of those locations are as effective or as easy as putting them in the pan.  And that's what many here have done.

The HD spec sheet also has a much busier new harness than is necessary if you're replacing a pre-existing rain gauge.  The new install specifies routing to the fuse panel for power, to the newly installed sending unit and on to the instrument in three legs off the supplied harness.  Humbug. 

At the existing gauge there's already power and ground for instrument and light.  So all that is needed is the signal from the sending unit.  You could take out the single wire sender, put in a two wire sender, use the signal wire and simply add a ground.  Would work just fine.

You'll snip the terminal or socket (whichever it has) off the end of the old signal wire to use the two wire socket matching the new sending unit.  Then just take its ground side to a good ground. 

Thank you.     I'm not thrilled with the look of the McEwan gauge and its cosmetic differences (I have straightened it since this picture was taken), but I'm not torn up about it either.  More concerned about instrument failure at this point, especially since having run across this thread, and learning of McEwan's demise, and the accompanying lack of end user support.  We'll see what happens with this thing, and if the need arises, I'll simply replace the sending unit and gauge and modify accordingly.   

[Twolanerider]

Thank you.     I'm not thrilled with the look of the McEwan gauge and its cosmetic differences (I have straightened it since this picture was taken), but I'm not torn up about it either.  More concerned about instrument failure at this point, especially since having run across this thread, and learning of McEwan's demise, and the accompanying lack of end user support.  We'll see what happens with this thing, and if the need arises, I'll simply replace the sending unit and gauge and modify accordingly.   

I understand.  Had one of the McEwan instruments in hand when he first released them several years ago.  Had spoken with him during work up to release and the piece wasn't the cosmetic match he'd promised it would be.  Sent it back without ever fully opening the package.  That was before several others suffered failures and McEwan's shop closed.  So I simply lucked out.