I've got no idea and no real concern over whether Clemens was or wasn't juiced. If he wasn't; great. If he was, eventually the hammer swings for almost everyone in some fashion or another.
Only two actual thoughts on the entire sordid affair and this section of baseball history. First is that guys like McGwire ought to be the ones that are pissed off. And him more than anyone. He broke no baseball rule. There weren't rules governing this when he played. With one great season he almost singlehandedly restored baseball to the masses after strikes and boredom and let it languish in the national attention. Yet he's tarred with the rest of it. He should've stood up and said "yeah, I wasn't the brightest guy in the pack, I used andro and X, Y and Z. It wasn't banned. I didn't cheat by the terms of the day. Folks, I'm sorry." That he didn't do that one small thing means he's lumped with all those that really are assholes. It's sad. There really are guys in this who weren't bad apples and just got rolled up. A livelihood, a life's effort and a legacy should not be forever demolished for breaking rules that weren't even written yet.
Second thought is Senator Mitchell's report. Have read a little more than half. And all of the "juicy" bits. As either an investigative document or something you'd expect to see prepared as a basis for a prosecution presentation to say it is thin is to say that the 110s are uniformly the cream of the engine crop. Folks cited within may indeed be guilty be as sin. They may deserve significant comeuppance. That livelihoods, lives efforts and legacies are branded scarlet by such a shallow reporting as Senator Mitchell has released is just sad though.
Not here, not in the US; we don't get to ruin lives and careers by screaming like Hearst at his worst. The Mitchell Report is just too reminiscent of a 12 year old screaming on a street corner some banner headline with very little investigation beneath the fold. It's barely more than Gail Wynand before his epiphany at the end of the book.