Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2  All

Author Topic: Supermeg vs Propipe  (Read 4289 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ridgerunr

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 921
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • TN

Supermeg vs Propipe
« on: March 14, 2015, 01:09:31 PM »

For a 2015 Touring, stock motor. Which is better for low end torque?
Logged
2004 Roadglide 113" (sold)
2014 CVO RoadKing
2015 RGS

LC110

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 667
    • WI


    • CVO1: 2009 FLTRSE3 Stardust Silver / Titanium Dust 1of 1344
Re: Supermeg vs Propipe
« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2015, 02:57:13 PM »

Supermeg IMO will give you the most TQ and it is tunable.
Logged
Spending time learning the science of the mechanisms of friction, lubrication, and wear of interacting surfaces that are in relative motion
Razorback Performance Built & Tuned 113@ 122.59 HP/139.30 TQ

Spiderman

  • aka Spiderman "guest"
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1302

    • CVO1: 2003 FLHRSEI2
    • CVO2: 2007 FLTR (faux CVO)
Re: Supermeg vs Propipe
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2015, 03:26:49 PM »

 :worthless:

B B
Logged

Puma

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 359
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • NJ


    • CVO1: 2014 FLHRSE Dragula 2, SESTP, C&C Fastback
Re: Supermeg vs Propipe
« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2015, 05:38:00 PM »

For a 2015 Touring, stock motor. Which is better for low end torque?
I swear by Dragos Bike Works - Dragula2 (2 into 1). I put one on my CVO King and ended up with 97.5 hp and 118 lbs. ft. from a totally stock motor. Dragos is a vendor on here. Check out their web-site dragosbikeworks.com. Give the number a call. You'll get Frank, the owner. He answers the phone, returns calls, and KNOWS HIS S**T.
« Last Edit: March 14, 2015, 05:39:36 PM by Puma »
Logged
2014 CVO Road King: Titianium/Black, Dragula 2 (2-1), SESTP, C&C Fastback

hd-dude

  • Global Moderator
  • 5k CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6646
  • 2005 Cherry FLHTCSE2 "Obsession"

    • CVO1: 05 FLHTCSE2
    • Metal Dragon
Re: Supermeg vs Propipe
« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2015, 07:46:12 PM »

The Supermeg is a great pipe. Torque hits very early and carries out. You'll give up a few HP on top with it but I'd trade the torque for HP any day.

BritGuy

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1000
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • BC

Re: Supermeg vs Propipe
« Reply #5 on: March 15, 2015, 12:28:00 PM »

I run a Supertrapp Supermeg  and I am very happy with it. Impressive numbers for the Dragula pipe though..
Logged

Spiderman

  • aka Spiderman "guest"
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1302

    • CVO1: 2003 FLHRSEI2
    • CVO2: 2007 FLTR (faux CVO)
Re: Supermeg vs Propipe
« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2015, 01:46:26 PM »

I swear by Dragos Bike Works - Dragula2 (2 into 1). I put one on my CVO King and ended up with 97.5 hp and 118 lbs. ft. from a totally stock motor. Dragos is a vendor on here. Check out their web-site dragosbikeworks.com. Give the number a call. You'll get Frank, the owner. He answers the phone, returns calls, and KNOWS HIS S**T.

What size motor - - - 110?

B B
Logged

Puma

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 359
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • NJ


    • CVO1: 2014 FLHRSE Dragula 2, SESTP, C&C Fastback
Re: Supermeg vs Propipe
« Reply #7 on: March 15, 2015, 05:12:40 PM »

What size motor - - - 110?

B B
Yeah, 110.
« Last Edit: March 15, 2015, 05:15:33 PM by Puma »
Logged
2014 CVO Road King: Titianium/Black, Dragula 2 (2-1), SESTP, C&C Fastback

jonny cash

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 47
    • IL

    • CVO1: 2004 SEEG
    • CVO2: 2009 FLTRSE3
    • Nataliespoodles.com
Re: Supermeg vs Propipe
« Reply #8 on: March 15, 2015, 09:08:40 PM »

Supermeg!! Great sound, fit and finish, and power.  A lot of folks say you will give up a little on the top, but that is not my experience.
Logged

Puma

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 359
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • NJ


    • CVO1: 2014 FLHRSE Dragula 2, SESTP, C&C Fastback
Re: Supermeg vs Propipe
« Reply #9 on: March 15, 2015, 09:46:55 PM »

Here is my dyno print with the Dragula 2.
Logged
2014 CVO Road King: Titianium/Black, Dragula 2 (2-1), SESTP, C&C Fastback

Ridgerunr

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 921
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • TN

Re: Supermeg vs Propipe
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2015, 07:39:31 AM »

Thanks for the pics and dyno graph. Would like to see a graph for a Propipe. I've had great results with Supertrapps (2X1) over the past 23 years, would like to try a Propipe if it doesn't give up too much torque down low.
Logged
2004 Roadglide 113" (sold)
2014 CVO RoadKing
2015 RGS

Spiderman

  • aka Spiderman "guest"
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1302

    • CVO1: 2003 FLHRSEI2
    • CVO2: 2007 FLTR (faux CVO)
Re: Supermeg vs Propipe
« Reply #11 on: March 16, 2015, 11:33:32 AM »

The last time I used SuperTrapp was a set of duals for a ground up custom FXR I built back in 2002. Ended up with no discs and an open end cap to get my best tune. Sorta defeated the whole idea of a tunable exhaust in my mind so I have not paid attention to any new products of similar nature. I am curious though.

B B
Logged

jonny cash

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 47
    • IL

    • CVO1: 2004 SEEG
    • CVO2: 2009 FLTRSE3
    • Nataliespoodles.com
Re: Supermeg vs Propipe
« Reply #12 on: March 17, 2015, 09:16:43 PM »

supermeg, 20 discs closed end cap
Logged

Ridgerunr

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 921
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • TN

Re: Supermeg vs Propipe
« Reply #13 on: March 18, 2015, 09:02:23 AM »

Dang Johnny what size is that beast?
Logged
2004 Roadglide 113" (sold)
2014 CVO RoadKing
2015 RGS

jonny cash

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 47
    • IL

    • CVO1: 2004 SEEG
    • CVO2: 2009 FLTRSE3
    • Nataliespoodles.com
Re: Supermeg vs Propipe
« Reply #14 on: March 18, 2015, 02:05:33 PM »

124.  If i had beleived everything I read, including on here, then the supermeg just isn't big enough for a big engine.  I really didn;t care about the final number, just knew the meg had the bsound I was looking for.  It didn't hold it back, especially on top where the consensus seems to be that the supermeg lacks.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All
 

Page created in 0.219 seconds with 21 queries.