Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[GMR-PERFORMANCE]

take a picture of it with your phone send to to Steve@gmrperformance.com I will scan and send it back to you or host it with a link from photobucket..

[CVOThunder]

I scanned it and attempted to add the pdf but it would not allow me. Tried to do a copy and paste and that didn't work. then tried a powerpoint which didn't work either. Any suggestions?

Was the file size to large? You could open the file to your screen, do a print screen, open up paint and the "paste" icon should be highlighted in brown. Save it as a jpg with whatever name seems appropriate. If the jpg is too large you can manipulate the file size in paint and resave. Find out what the max file size allowed is and aim for that. I think it's like 350kb per photo and the total might be 350kb as well but I might be thinking about HTT. Only problem with doing a print screen is that it'll show more info than you might want to post up. Like what pages you have open and such. But you can use select to just grap the center section. Not the best program to use but hey it's free.

[grc]

"Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, swf, zip, pdf, xls, gdb, mt6, mt5, djm, doc, docx, slk, dt0, mt7, mt8
 Restrictions: 1 per post, maximum total size 2200KB, maximum individual size 2200KB"

Check the size of your pdf.  If it's larger than 2200 kb, scan it again at a lower resolution.  I've scanned and posted plenty of pages from manuals over the years with no problem, just had to adjust the resolution to fit within the site's limits.

Jerry

[GMR-PERFORMANCE]

Much easier to get a free photo account and then link it. All of my jpgs are linked via photobucket

[tstrick40]

Let me know if this works.

[grc]

Changed to png and rotated for easier viewing.  Click on image for full size.

Jerry

[GMR-PERFORMANCE]

Well if the engine is truly 110 stock inside then I would keep the sheet just do not run it on another drum as if you do the results will look the 1000's of other 110 stage I builds.  Not busting your chops here again stating that we tune hundreds of these and NONE ever make that much tq in stock set up.

A dyno is a tuning tool nothing more and you will see a change from drum to drum. I would wonder what a stock 110 makes on that drum .

[MrSurly]

Is that really SAE corrected? I suspect that something is missing from the story.
 Maybe I should run up to Winchester to get a Happy Dyno sheet!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[tstrick40]

All I can do is rely on the guy doing the tuning. I saw the numbers myself. Suggest you might want to contact him if you want to verify the numbers. The tuner (and owners) name is Jason. Just tell him Ted sent ya. I have had him build a couple motors and have no reason to distrust him.

[Beak Boater]

104 Ft Lbs of torque at 1700 rpms? Those SE255's are even better than I thought for a low end cam.

[CVOThunder]

Much easier to get a free photo account and then link it. All of my jpgs are linked via photobucket

And that's why I can't see your photos.  But then I'm probably one of the few who only accesses this website from a gooberment computer and until recently, ALL H-D websites were blocked. Not sure if there is a recommendation or rule that photos need to be posted via links but I don't think there is since there is a size limitation.

[Unbalanced]

the superflow dyno uses a conversion to try and compare their numbers with DynoJet.   While it is a great tool to work with it does not read the same as a dynojet and the conversion only changes it more.    Used to be that you would add approx. 8 percent to a standard Superflow run to get your numbers to compare with a dynojet.   The conversion however gets you in the ballpark of what your numbers would be with the industry standard at this point being Dynojet.   so much so that even S&S switched from SuperFlow to dynojet.

Running your bike on a dynojet would most likely lower the numbers a tiny bit.    On any given day or comparision of day to day on the same dyno you could see variances in your numbers of approx. 1 to 2 depending on weather and conditions.

If it runs good and your happy so be it, its a tool.   If you counting on blasting past people because you have higher numbers, then I wouldn't be quite so eager and may want to compare it in a semi apples to apples scenario on a dynojet.   

[grc]

Is that SAE corrected? I suspect that something is missing from the story.
 Maybe I should run up to Winchester to get a Happy Dyno sheet!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I automatically question any sheet that doesn't include basic and important information like actual run conditions and the correction factor used.  It's pretty easy to come up with happy curves when things like bogus atmospheric conditions are plugged in to a correction factor for instance.  I would also want to see the AFR trace on a chart I was paying for, but that's just me.

Regardless, anyone who actually understands the purpose of this type of dynamometer doesn't take the max numbers seriously.  They are a tool to be used by the tuner, not something to create charts for guys to brag about or for the tuner to promote his business.  In other words, anyone can bench race and hang charts on the wall to brag about or to promote their business, but it doesn't mean diddly to anyone who knows better.  And let's also not forget, the important tuning for a street bike goes on in the areas you don't see on that single WOT chart.

Jerry

[tstrick40]

Posting my numbers was not to "brag" about what my numbers were, I was just responding to a post. My "seat of the pants" dyno tells me the bike runs cooler and has a lot more pep then before the changes were made. I am not a racer, I just enjoy riding and making my bike mine. Numbers are numbers and I ride and made the changes because I wanted the bike to run more efficiently then when it left the factory. I also understand that numbers vary due to conditions that just happen so as they say, they are just numbers. I had the work done because it was what I wanted, not because I wanted my numbers to be higher than someone else's. I also bought the CVO not to think I was better than just a Limited but because I liked it and decided to mortgage the house to get it (just kidding). Bottom line is, the dyno was done to tune the bike in to what was best for performance and my style of riding and Jason did what I asked. The "paper" was just the result of what he did. If you want to say the numbers are bogus, that's ok with me. I will still ride and enjoy the crap out of it for a long time. Sorry if I caused a stir!!!

[GMR-PERFORMANCE]

    All good on this end.. as I said right from the start the dyno is a tool..