Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All

Author Topic: Trouble with 10.5 drop in pistons  (Read 8708 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

FLSTFI Dave

  • IBA 69147
  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6732

    • CVO1: 2023 FLTRXSE Whiskey Neat
    • CVO2: 2021 RA1250S Pan America Special
    • CVO3: 2003 Fatboy, 95"quot, S&ampS 570 gear drive cam
Re: Trouble with 10.5 drop in pistons
« Reply #30 on: July 09, 2016, 09:07:26 PM »

[quoteWhat's not to like?]

The thin cylinder liner, in stock alloy.

The bang for the buck with the 117 HD kit can not be beaten, simple as that.
$2400 retail at 10.6 comp.

I'm 99% positive the Harley drop in 117 Kit is not 10.6 comp.  That is why I did not look at the kit, compression is to low, its only 9.9 to 1.  You could bring it up a little with a thinner gasket than the kit uses, but still well under 10.6 to 1.

http://www.harley-davidson.com/store/screamin-eagle-bolt-on-cvo-117--street-performance-kit
Quote
Includes 4.125" Bolt-On Cylinders, Forged 9.9:1 Compression Pistons & Rings, 58mm Throttle Body, High Flow Fuel Injectors, SE-259E Cams, Perfect-Fit Pushrods, High-Capacity Roller Tappets, Inner Cam Bearing, Top End & Cam Cover Gasket, EO Emissions Label
Logged
2023 FLTRXSE Whiskey Neat
2021 RA1250S Pan America Special
2019 FLTRXSE Red Pepper / Magnetic Gray Traded
2018 FLTRXSE Gunship Gray  Traded
2017 FLHXSE  Starfire Black / Atomic Red  Traded
2015 FLTRUSE Abyss Blue / Crushed Saphire Traded
2013 FLHRSE5 Diamond Dust 117  Traded
2012 FLTRXSE White Gold Pearl / Starfire Black  Traded
2009 FLTRSE3 Silver/Titanium  Traded
2003 Fatboy, real fire paint set,

ultraswede

  • Guest
Re: Trouble with 10.5 drop in pistons
« Reply #31 on: July 10, 2016, 03:34:51 AM »



How thick do you think a drop in 117 is?? Lol

It has a proper cylinder liner thickness, made of tool steel, hence my comment on stock alloy in a bored 110 to 113.
(or a 96 to 107 for that matter)

The spigot is thin on the 117, but Im talking about the liner, distorting from heat.

I have no confidence in the aftermarket 107 and 113 bore jobs.

For me the proof is in the fact the there are no reports of any failures here or on techtalk with bolt in 110 or 117.
That will be the route Im going, unless I chose a Revperf 113 cylinder.

There are a few reports on oil drinking 107 and 113 on techtalk and one with pic on a ruined 113 cyl.
My 107 became an oil burner after some miles, the whole kit bought in the US from a reputable supplier.
Logged

ultraswede

  • Guest
Re: Trouble with 10.5 drop in pistons
« Reply #32 on: July 10, 2016, 03:40:26 AM »

I'm 99% positive the Harley drop in 117 Kit is not 10.6 comp.  That is why I did not look at the kit, compression is to low, its only 9.9 to 1.  You could bring it up a little with a thinner gasket than the kit uses, but still well under 10.6 to 1.

http://www.harley-davidson.com/store/screamin-eagle-bolt-on-cvo-117--street-performance-kit

You are correct Sir.

However, in my statement I said $2400 retail.
That include this 10.7 piston:
http://www.suburbanharley.com/Wisconsin-Harley-Davidson-Service-Performance-Center--pistons
at $416.95

The kit itself is around $2000
Logged

Fullsac Performance

  • Vendor
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1753
  • Never ride with a Halfsac! Insist on Fullsac Perf!
    • AZ

    • Fullsac Performance
Re: Trouble with 10.5 drop in pistons
« Reply #33 on: July 10, 2016, 09:33:39 AM »

It has a proper cylinder liner thickness, made of tool steel, hence my comment on stock alloy in a bored 110 to 113.
(or a 96 to 107 for that matter)

The spigot is thin on the 117, but Im talking about the liner, distorting from heat.

I have no confidence in the aftermarket 107 and 113 bore jobs.

For me the proof is in the fact the there are no reports of any failures here or on techtalk with bolt in 110 or 117.
That will be the route Im going, unless I chose a Revperf 113 cylinder.

There are a few reports on oil drinking 107 and 113 on techtalk and one with pic on a ruined 113 cyl.
My 107 became an oil burner after some miles, the whole kit bought in the US from a reputable supplier.

Its absolutely possible to botch any build through a number of ways and end up with an oil burner.
Just this year I seen a 117 and a 124 build done by reputable shops, both pushed out the door for an
"easy 500 mile break in" with fuel maps so lean they had no chance of making it to 50 miles with out overheating and damaging the ring seal. Luckily both owners after one trip around the block contacted me with concerns over the driveability issues they had. Both bikes went straight in to my dyno room for AFR evaluation and the needed adjustments before the ring seal was ruined by an "easy break in".
My personal experience has not seen any issues with 98", 107", 113 or 117 barrel thickness when I assembled and tuned them. Steve@GMR has done a high number of 113s in house and kits sent out.
Maybe we can get him to comment on the success rate of the 113s he assembled in house, broke in and tuned on the dyno, VS any issues that arose from kits sent out. If there were any?

Steve@fullsac.com
Logged
Steve@fullsac.com  www.fullsac.com
Never argue with idiots. They will beat you with experience.

Mr D

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1897
    • WI

Re: Trouble with 10.5 drop in pistons
« Reply #34 on: July 10, 2016, 11:11:41 AM »

Here's an example of a "drop in" 117 @ 10.6 gettin it done  :2vrolijk_21:

Logged
2014 FLHRSE6 Orange/Black
2012 FLHXSE3 Ruby/Typhoon [Sold]
2007 SEUC2 Red/Blk [Sold]
2006 SEUC Haze/Black [Sold]
2005 SEEG Yellow [Sold]
2003 VRSCA [Sold]
"I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me"
Phil 4:13

FLSTFI Dave

  • IBA 69147
  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6732

    • CVO1: 2023 FLTRXSE Whiskey Neat
    • CVO2: 2021 RA1250S Pan America Special
    • CVO3: 2003 Fatboy, 95"quot, S&ampS 570 gear drive cam
Re: Trouble with 10.5 drop in pistons
« Reply #35 on: July 10, 2016, 09:20:53 PM »

You are correct Sir.

However, in my statement I said $2400 retail.
That include this 10.7 piston:
http://www.suburbanharley.com/Wisconsin-Harley-Davidson-Service-Performance-Center--pistons
at $416.95

The kit itself is around $2000
But that is one Harley shops kit, not the Kit in the P&A catalog.  It's a nice set up and yields much better results than the P&A kit.  However if you do not have a tuner such as a TTS or SE race tuner you can add a few hundred more dollars.

Logged
2023 FLTRXSE Whiskey Neat
2021 RA1250S Pan America Special
2019 FLTRXSE Red Pepper / Magnetic Gray Traded
2018 FLTRXSE Gunship Gray  Traded
2017 FLHXSE  Starfire Black / Atomic Red  Traded
2015 FLTRUSE Abyss Blue / Crushed Saphire Traded
2013 FLHRSE5 Diamond Dust 117  Traded
2012 FLTRXSE White Gold Pearl / Starfire Black  Traded
2009 FLTRSE3 Silver/Titanium  Traded
2003 Fatboy, real fire paint set,

ultraswede

  • Guest
Re: Trouble with 10.5 drop in pistons
« Reply #36 on: July 11, 2016, 02:42:32 AM »

But that is one Harley shops kit, not the Kit in the P&A catalog.  It's a nice set up and yields much better results than the P&A kit.  However if you do not have a tuner such as a TTS or SE race tuner you can add a few hundred more dollars.

I'm talking about the 10.7 piston for the PA kit, not a dealer 117 set up.
The only thing that's not HD/PA would be the pistons, the rest of kit 92500053 is used in my example.
As for the cost of a tuner, that is a prerequisite even for a stage 1.

Just pointing out possibilities.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All
 

Page created in 0.159 seconds with 25 queries.