Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]  All

Author Topic: Crankshaft end play  (Read 6082 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mcdonaldroadcapt

  • CVO Third Time around
  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 411
  • FLHRSEI.ORG

    • CVO1: 2006 flhtcuse 1
    • CVO2: 2007 flhtcuse 2
    • CVO3: 2008 flhtcuse 3
Re: Crankshaft end play
« Reply #15 on: August 03, 2016, 08:50:34 AM »

Thanks for valuable info.
Logged

mcdonaldroadcapt

  • CVO Third Time around
  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 411
  • FLHRSEI.ORG

    • CVO1: 2006 flhtcuse 1
    • CVO2: 2007 flhtcuse 2
    • CVO3: 2008 flhtcuse 3
Re: Crankshaft end play
« Reply #16 on: August 07, 2016, 03:11:28 PM »

Have not finished my job of checking crank shaft end play due to illness. However, after taking another look awaiting tolerance dial, why is it necessary to have the new comp torqued in order to check end play. Don't understand what the torqued comp bolt has to do with the end play. Would you please explain and thanks.
Logged

prodrag1320

  • AMRA & AHDRA P/D record holder
  • Vendor
  • Elite CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 917
Re: Crankshaft end play
« Reply #17 on: August 07, 2016, 05:24:46 PM »

When you tighten the compenstator,it will pull the lower end tight up against the bearing.pretty much the same on a timken motor,when the compensator is tightened,it pulls the bearings together.both set ups have to have the compesator tight to check end play

Trapperdog

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2965

    • CVO1: 2007 FLHTCUSE2
    • CVO2: 2009 ST1300 Police
    • CVO3: 2006 ST1300
Re: Crankshaft end play
« Reply #18 on: August 07, 2016, 08:13:19 PM »

When the '07's crank problems started coming out, I seem to remember a service buliten or tech tip on checking tolerances on the comp side. I remember the numbers being different than the pump side but that doesn't make sense. Getting old and memories fading
Logged

grc

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14216
  • AKA Grouchy Old Fart
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2005 SEEG2
Re: Crankshaft end play
« Reply #19 on: August 07, 2016, 09:48:14 PM »

When the '07's crank problems started coming out, I seem to remember a service buliten or tech tip on checking tolerances on the comp side. I remember the numbers being different than the pump side but that doesn't make sense. Getting old and memories fading

At the time there wasn't a great way to actually check radial runout on the drive side since there wasn't an easily accessible machined surface to check with a dial indicator.  Much of the shaft was left as cast.  I remember people trying to check it using the splined part of the shaft, and of course that was a very iffy process that wasn't likely to give great results.

Let's face it, the product in '07 was a joke, but it wasn't funny for the people who bought one.  The latest versions are improved, because Harley didn't have a choice but to do something before all the crank problems and failures not only blew the warranty budget but more importantly before the bad press shut off the sales.  As far as I'm concerned the product is still shoddy compared to most other offerings out there, but at least most folks don't seem to be having them scissor before the 1000 mile checkup.  They still have way too much runout on the pinion shaft, which creates excessive wear of the cam plate and the oil pump.  And the design is still too fragile, thus all the attempts to protect it with cush drives in the rear wheel, a slipper clutch, and the long travel compensator that is still problematic after nine years.  Oh, I almost forgot, they also instituted the torque management strategy with the electronic throttle system, whereby the throttle plate opens slower than what the rotation of the throttle grip should provide at low engine speeds.

Tech Tip 324 attached.

JMHO - Jerry
« Last Edit: August 07, 2016, 09:54:26 PM by grc »
Logged
Jerry - 2005 Cherry SEEG  -  Member # 1155

H-D and me  -  a classic love / hate relationship.  Current score:  love 40, hate 50, bewildered 10.

Trapperdog

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2965

    • CVO1: 2007 FLHTCUSE2
    • CVO2: 2009 ST1300 Police
    • CVO3: 2006 ST1300
Re: Crankshaft end play
« Reply #20 on: August 07, 2016, 10:22:16 PM »

At the time there wasn't a great way to actually check radial runout on the drive side since there wasn't an easily accessible machined surface to check with a dial indicator.  Much of the shaft was left as cast.  I remember people trying to check it using the splined part of the shaft, and of course that was a very iffy process that wasn't likely to give great results.

Let's face it, the product in '07 was a joke, but it wasn't funny for the people who bought one.  The latest versions are improved, because Harley didn't have a choice but to do something before all the crank problems and failures not only blew the warranty budget but more importantly before the bad press shut off the sales.  As far as I'm concerned the product is still shoddy compared to most other offerings out there, but at least most folks don't seem to be having them scissor before the 1000 mile checkup.  They still have way too much runout on the pinion shaft, which creates excessive wear of the cam plate and the oil pump.  And the design is still too fragile, thus all the attempts to protect it with cush drives in the rear wheel, a slipper clutch, and the long travel compensator that is still problematic after nine years.  Oh, I almost forgot, they also instituted the torque management strategy with the electronic throttle system, whereby the throttle plate opens slower than what the rotation of the throttle grip should provide at low engine speeds.

Tech Tip 324 attached.

JMHO - Jerry
That's the one, I was somewhat close.
And the second paragraph represents why we also own four other different manufacturers bikes
Logged

Unbalanced

  • FUD Examiner
  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6710

    • CVO1: 2011 SESG,
    • CVO2: 2004 SEEG Pumpkin,
    • CVO3: 2002 Police Roadking, Maudie and Maybelle Slayer
Re: Crankshaft end play
« Reply #21 on: August 07, 2016, 11:06:07 PM »

As a recipient of 07 beta testing all i can say is i wont be the guinea pig for the 17's we will have to see how the CVO's with the 114's hold up.   I think the Red one is gonna be sharp looking.
Logged
HBRR Florida Chapter,  STILL - The Fastest Chapter - Proven yet again Bikeweek 2017

mcdonaldroadcapt

  • CVO Third Time around
  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 411
  • FLHRSEI.ORG

    • CVO1: 2006 flhtcuse 1
    • CVO2: 2007 flhtcuse 2
    • CVO3: 2008 flhtcuse 3
Re: Crankshaft end play
« Reply #22 on: August 08, 2016, 06:20:12 AM »

When the '07's crank problems started coming out, I seem to remember a service buliten or tech tip on checking tolerances on the comp side. I remember the numbers being different than the pump side but that doesn't make sense. Getting old and memories fading
Got it and thanks.
Logged

Rooster

  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5181
  • FLhtcuse2.ORG
Re: Crankshaft end play
« Reply #23 on: August 11, 2016, 05:55:50 PM »

As a recipient of 07 beta testing all i can say is i wont be the guinea pig for the 17's we will have to see how the CVO's with the 114's hold up.   I think the Red one is gonna be sharp looking.
I'm with Harry on this as well. I am hopeful for success but I'm going to let others do the testing this time around. I still prefer HD over the Victory and Indian but at least they get a more reliable motor and tranny than the HD offering and a lot less $$$. Well so far at least. I have one friend with a Victory Cross Country with more than 140k and has only replaced oil and tires. And that is what we all want I believe. I know many of us have invested thousands of $$ more trying to get there.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All
 

Page created in 0.219 seconds with 21 queries.