Well, technically I guess he has until midnight tonight, June 19th, but I ain't holding my breath. And I see Eqcons is having the very same problem. This sucks major big time. Keep pouring on the coals Don - not only for yourself but for all the other trusting souls who bought into their hype.
Jerry,
Seeing Jim's post above is yet another to add to the storyline. You'd not believe some of the PM's I've gotten since this has started as well. People's stories of lack of support, poor support, contradictory support and variations thereof are just startling. And so many. Many are quite concerned about being public in their concerns for fear they'll foreclose any options they might have of future assistance. Talk about feeling one's self to be between a rock and a hard place....
Jim, very sorry to read that you're suffering too. For a system that's supposed to be good, supported by an extensive library of excellent base maps, and able to adapt from those maps to supply us with an excellent, safe and reliable riding experience it certainly is full of ping sometimes. If one is lucky enough to score well with an accurate implementation via software map you are apparently good to go. Some have reported exactly such.
Too many are not though. Not even close is too often the case. Yet we're still supplied product and told we're ready for prime time. It seems not. You and Fr8trn have damaged if not cosmetically ruined exhaust. I'd likely have done the same if I'd not just pretty much stayed off the bike in the hottest of weather lately. Issues abound. Solutions, apparently, do not. Or at least not easily.
After Kitzmiller was either embarassed or annoyed enough to finally respond here during the last couple of days my documents response was sent back to them promptly yesterday. This morning I received a perfectly pleasant email from Dan Fitzmaurice asking for clarification on the driveablility concerns and a more thorough description of how the bike was behaving. That description was all here in the early part of this thread of course. But I can understand Kitzmiller not wanting to direct his colleague to this thread.
I responded to the gentleman's email of this morning and got this in response just before noon:
Don- This is good data I can work from. I will work on a revised table and forward it to you later tonight with instructions.
Thanks
Dan Fitzmaurice Got home from a concert in Kansas City late this evening. No further response as of yet. So the initial promise of "later tonight" was missed.
However..... I'm not going to damn the man's efforts for one day. I don't know what is involved in what he's doing. I'd rather it be good than quick. So if he initially suggests one day and it happens to be the next that's fine. Ideally if his own suggested deadline is going to be missed he'd send a quick follow up advising such. I did ask to be kept apprized of progress. But right now it's just a few hours one way or the other and not a big deal.
If it drags on, however, then, well, it is what is. Right now I'm allowing the man the latitude to make the effort without new complaint. Ask me again in another 24/48 if "latitude to make the effort" is euphemism for "enough rope to hang themselves."
Ideally a mention here would be a gentle prod to remind them to pursue a solution. I'm damned if I'm chasing them any longer though. It is not appropriate that a company makes its clients force them to appropriate response and effort. It's simply not fair. It's less than ethical. Quite frankly it's a lazy approach to avoid as much effort as can be avoided short of being forced in to it.
In the end Zippers will either deliver an effective solution (for which I'd thank Fitzmaurice for his efforts quite gladly) or they won't. If not they'll know they and their system haven't lived up to their promises or even baseline expectations. At that point they'll either offer to buy the system back or they won't. The choice for ethical and correct or avoidant and dismissive will be theirs though. Others later can judge whether to patronize the company based entirely on the choices they make and the efforts (or effectiveness thereof) they exercise on thier clients' behalf.