As a lot of you know, I am waiting for the right CVO Ultra (103, or 110) to come along.
In the mean time, I've been doing the other bad thing which is thinking. Over on HTT, I posed the question, How does my '01 with AMS Heads and 96.4" kit, Andrews 26g cams, Zippers 50mm TB and T-Max compare with the stock HD 96"? In other words 96" vs 96". I realy like the way my bike runs, I just want something newer and dependable since I just went through ANOTHER stator while on the road. Most of the HTT folks said that there is no comparison, and that my mildly built engine would out do a stock 96". They added that a the newer engine could also be built to equal or beat my bike. That much I pretty much knew, but having never ridden the new TC 96, and with nothing to compare my bike to I had to ask those who have ridden both. But if I have to build a newer 96 to at least match my current bike, why not buy one already built like a stock CVO 103/110?
So my question to the CVO world, is how does my built '01 engine compare to a stock CVO 103 or 110. I say stock 103/110 because for the most part, except for air cleaner, exhaust and maybe an FI tuning system, most, not all, but most CVO owners leave the engines alone. You don't see too many CVO owners adding larger juggs, pistons, cams and getting head work done. Is that because the stock 103/110s are equal to my current build, and don't need the extra work, or because CVO owners would rather leave it "CVO stock" for resale value and collectability?
Having said all that, my current build is my starting bench mark. In other words, my next bike has to run at least as well as what I have now.
Thanks
Mark