Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Twin Cam longivity????  (Read 1481 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

schreijo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 26
  • Strength and Honor
Twin Cam longivity????
« on: September 05, 2005, 01:30:45 PM »

How many miles should I expect before the engine needs to be rebuilt?  I'm at a point where I need to decide to buy a new bike or keep riding it and expect to rebuild in the future.  
Logged

BLM777

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2187
  • Who says 110's won't run? SofA 777

    • CVO1: FXSTSSE3 Black Diamond/Emerald Ice
Re: Twin Cam longivity????
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2005, 01:52:52 PM »

Quote
How many miles should I expect before the engine needs to be rebuilt?
Logged

JimsSEEG

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 193
Re: Twin Cam longivity????
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2005, 01:57:35 PM »

Depends on the curretn conditon of the engine. Compression, oil consumption, power output, etc, etc, etc.  If you can check on a few things (or have them checked out by an independant or dealer) and get an estimate of the current condition of the motor compared to the number of miles, that will give you an idea.

You can have an engine last 100k miles that's been well maintained and aserviced or be ready for a rebuild in 10k miles on an engine that gets thrashed every times it goes out.  Depends on the rider, riding style, maintenance, and a host of other items. This is about like "how long should my tires last" - just depends.

Jim
Logged
Jim


"Ophelia"

"pull that thing in here - it's not running good enough to scatter sh*& with a hay rake...."   E.K.

schreijo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 26
  • Strength and Honor
Re: Twin Cam longivity????
« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2005, 02:02:13 PM »

100 K out of an aircooled engine sounds to good to be true.  I had always heard performance will drop off around 40,000.  Is the twin cam durability that much better than the evo engine?
Logged

spydglide

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11892
  • spyder-psychle
Re: Twin Cam longivity????
« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2005, 02:20:11 PM »

performance drop off at 40K miles should not be that noticeable......sure, some loss of compression, but no great rideability performance drop.  I base this on personal experience with EVO engine, not twin-cam, although I would not expect much difference.  Not unusual to get 100K plus miles out of a EVO without any major work, just routine maintenance.  Way different from the older HD motors (knuckles, pans, and even shovels).   [smiley=xyxthumbs.gif]   spyder
Logged
2004 FLHTCSE Cobalt 'Huckleberry'  .....94K+mi.     &  1994 FLSTN 'OleGranny' .....116K+mi.

JCZ

  • Global Moderator
  • 10K CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23603
    • AZ


    • CVO1: 04 SEEG...sold
    • CVO2: 10 SESG...sold
    • CVO3: 13 FLHTCSE 8
Re: Twin Cam longivity????
« Reply #5 on: September 05, 2005, 07:33:14 PM »

Quote
100 K out of an aircooled engine sounds to good to be true.
Logged
Never trade the thrills of living for the security of existence.  Remember...it's the journey, not the destination!

West Coast GTG   
Reno, NV (04), Reno, NV (05),  Cripple Creek, CO (06)  Hood River, OR (09), Lake Tahoe, CA (11) Carmel, CA (14), Ouray CO (15) Fortuna, Ca. (16)

hd-dude

  • Global Moderator
  • 5k CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6646
  • 2005 Cherry FLHTCSE2 "Obsession"

    • CVO1: 05 FLHTCSE2
    • Metal Dragon
Re: Twin Cam longivity????
« Reply #6 on: September 05, 2005, 11:15:55 PM »

My biggest concern would be the cam shoes. If they are not inspected and or replaced every 15 - 20k at the most your looking for problems. The other alternative is to switch to a gear drive setup.

Dr. Evil

  • The Great Pumpkin
  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 622
  • BooFrickityHoo.


    • CVO1: 2004 FLHTCSE Pumpkin
Re: Twin Cam longivity????
« Reply #7 on: September 06, 2005, 08:38:47 PM »

A buddy has a 2000 95" RKC.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2005, 08:41:02 PM by DJW »
Logged

Willie D

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 426
  • Live Life at Full Throttle !

    • CVO1: FLSTSE3
    • CVO2: FLHRSEI
    • CVO3: FXDWG2
Re: Twin Cam longivity????
« Reply #8 on: September 06, 2005, 09:42:44 PM »

Quote
My biggest concern would be the cam shoes. If they are not inspected and or replaced every 15 - 20k at the most your looking for problems. The other alternative is to switch to a gear drive setup.


I am with ya there. I had mine replaced at 50K and it now has 63,500 and seems to run stronger that when it was new....Dealer always said that they are traded before they get broke in, I think he's correct. .  .. I hate to think of getting a new set of wheels, but after I put 100K on the SERK......who knows ? [smiley=nixweiss.gif]
Logged
'Keep your Knees in the Breeze'
01 FXDWG- 11,000 + sold
02 FLHRSEI-66k + traded
New 06 FLTRI - Sold
08 XL1200 N - sold
2010 FLSTFB - Trade
2012 FLSTSE3 - Satin Pewter - 'Brush Gold'
2015 BMW F700GS
2017 Indian Chieftain Dark Horse  TS 111

hd-dude

  • Global Moderator
  • 5k CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6646
  • 2005 Cherry FLHTCSE2 "Obsession"

    • CVO1: 05 FLHTCSE2
    • Metal Dragon
Re: Twin Cam longivity????
« Reply #9 on: September 06, 2005, 10:49:06 PM »

Quote

I am with ya there. I had mine replaced at 50K and it now has 63,500 and seems to run stronger that when it was new....Dealer always said that they are traded before they get broke in, I think he's correct. .
 

Page created in 0.217 seconds with 21 queries.