Topic: 103 hp and torque differences (Read 1499 times)

sefatboyscott · « **on:** September 21, 2005, 10:10:59 PM »

OK Harley Davidson claims 96 lbs of torque at 4000 rpms on a stock CVO fatboy.but they don't mention a thing about hp? ANyone know what the bike is putting out fully stock?

OK the other strange an [smiley=nixweiss.gif]d twisted part of this is the SE Ultra puts out 100 lbs of torque at 4000 rpms............ok is the bike geared a tad lower to compensate for the added weight?? I was under the impression that both these bikes had the same exact set up as far as drivetrain is concerened. am i WRONG AND IF i AM NOT WHICH ONE IS THE TRUTH AND WHICH ONE IS A LIE??

110tHunDer · « **Reply #1 on:** September 21, 2005, 11:10:41 PM »

Scott, the Fat Boy has a counterbalanced motor to quell the vibes in the solid mounted frame. The Ultra does not have the balancers and is rubber mounted to reduce vibration. The counterbalancers rob a few HP/TQ.

sefatboyscott · « **Reply #2 on:** September 21, 2005, 11:12:24 PM »

Quote

Scott, the Fat Boy has a counterbalanced motor to quell the vibes in the solid mounted frame.

110tHunDer · « **Reply #3 on:** September 21, 2005, 11:17:57 PM »

Quote

Thanks that explains alot to me! Any idea on hp on either of these stock??

Ballpark, 80 - 85.

110tHunDer · « **Reply #4 on:** September 21, 2005, 11:22:11 PM »

Then again, at the crank, which is where they're measuring those 96 - 100 torque figures, probably around 90 or so.

Author Topic: 103 hp and torque differences (Read 1499 times)

sefatboyscott

103 hp and torque differences

110tHunDer

Re: 103 hp and torque differences

sefatboyscott

Re: 103 hp and torque differences

110tHunDer

Re: 103 hp and torque differences

110tHunDer

Re: 103 hp and torque differences