Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All

Author Topic: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?  (Read 18683 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Diamondback

  • Diamondback
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1176
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #30 on: June 17, 2011, 01:09:50 PM »

 :2vrolijk_21: :2vrolijk_21:
Logged
2010 FXDFSE2 CVO Fat Bob, V&H staggers, Windshield, saddle bags, passenger back rest. 

2011 CVO Ultra Glide, Progressive Monotubes, Ultra 944's, Power Vision, ceramic headpipes, Cellset, Cee Baileys 15" and Fullsac 1.75"
Former 2009 SE Ultra, Rineharts, Stage I, PC V with autotune non cat header pipe
Former 2007 SE Ultra, D&D, Stage I, TMAT Metzlers
Former 2006 Dragonfly Ultra
Former 1999 Road King

RedEagle

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 534

    • CVO1: '10 FLHTCUSE5, FullSac Xpipe, 2",TTS, 8 speaker HogTunes!
    • CVO2: WO's Chubby 578, Road Tech Zumo 660
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #31 on: June 17, 2011, 04:38:14 PM »

I have a 2010 CVO Ultra and was thinking about upgrading the exhaust system. I found this thread about fullsac's from a year ago. Can anyone chime in with opinions after riding for a while with the fullsac cvo stage 1 setup. I see the power benefits are just about the same for both cores. I am curious about the sound difference between the 1.75 and 2.0 muffler cores?  I am leaning towards the 1.75 core because I don't want the sound to get annoying on long trips. Your opinions would be greatly appreciated. tks
I have the same bike you do...*S
I did the x pipe and 2.0 baffles with the Master Tune!!  You will Love it Best Bang for the Buck by Far!!
and you get to keep those nice muffler cans keeps the Stock look which I think is Great!!  I might do the Cams and head gasket, but to tell the truth it really runs Great with out them!!
I am sure that you will love it!!
Logged
I was so much Older then....I am younger than that Now.

CVOIRA

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 48

    • CVO1: 2010 FLHTCUSE5 - Scarlett Red Pearl & Dark Slate
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #32 on: July 03, 2011, 01:52:58 PM »

Install is almost complete. I am up to loading the 1.75 map. I noticed after loading the map onto the ECM the file name was FP-2010-11-CVO110-Stg-I-XPipe-2.0.MT7 (74K). Steve is unavailable today so I was hoping someone that ordered the 1.75 cores for their bike could look to see what the file name of their map that Steve sent. Just want to make sure Steve sent me the correct map. I would think he would use 1.75 in the file name for 1.75 cores. Maybe it's the same map for the. 2.0. Thanks for your help.
Logged

HOGMIKE

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2378
  • 65 FLH 93" + others
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #33 on: July 03, 2011, 02:15:04 PM »

Install is almost complete. I am up to loading the 1.75 map. I noticed after loading the map onto the ECM the file name was FP-2010-11-CVO110-Stg-I-XPipe-2.0.MT7 (74K). Steve is unavailable today so I was hoping someone that ordered the 1.75 cores for their bike could look to see what the file name of their map that Steve sent. Just want to make sure Steve sent me the correct map. I would think he would use 1.75 in the file name for 1.75 cores. Maybe it's the same map for the. 2.0. Thanks for your help.

If this is the map he sent you, it will probably be just fine, there is little difference between the muffler cores as far as flow. I would start with that map if you planned to go riding until next week when everyone gets back to work.
JMHO 8)
Logged
HOGMIKE

Diamondback

  • Diamondback
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1176
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #34 on: July 03, 2011, 05:11:41 PM »

 :2vrolijk_21: :2vrolijk_21:
Logged
2010 FXDFSE2 CVO Fat Bob, V&H staggers, Windshield, saddle bags, passenger back rest. 

2011 CVO Ultra Glide, Progressive Monotubes, Ultra 944's, Power Vision, ceramic headpipes, Cellset, Cee Baileys 15" and Fullsac 1.75"
Former 2009 SE Ultra, Rineharts, Stage I, PC V with autotune non cat header pipe
Former 2007 SE Ultra, D&D, Stage I, TMAT Metzlers
Former 2006 Dragonfly Ultra
Former 1999 Road King

CVOIRA

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 48

    • CVO1: 2010 FLHTCUSE5 - Scarlett Red Pearl & Dark Slate
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #35 on: July 04, 2011, 10:36:47 AM »

Mike,

Thanks for your response yesterday. Steve was also nice enough to respond over the weekend and confirm the 1.75 and 2.0 cores share the exact same map changes. Finishing up today and will take her out for a spin later. Can't wait  :)

Ira
Logged

Diamondback

  • Diamondback
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1176
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #36 on: July 04, 2011, 12:15:07 PM »

 :2vrolijk_21: :2vrolijk_21: :2vrolijk_21:

Enjoy the ride.

More power, better throttle response, less heat, better gas mileage and it will sound like a Harley.

 :coolblue: :coolblue:
Logged
2010 FXDFSE2 CVO Fat Bob, V&H staggers, Windshield, saddle bags, passenger back rest. 

2011 CVO Ultra Glide, Progressive Monotubes, Ultra 944's, Power Vision, ceramic headpipes, Cellset, Cee Baileys 15" and Fullsac 1.75"
Former 2009 SE Ultra, Rineharts, Stage I, PC V with autotune non cat header pipe
Former 2007 SE Ultra, D&D, Stage I, TMAT Metzlers
Former 2006 Dragonfly Ultra
Former 1999 Road King

CVOIRA

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 48

    • CVO1: 2010 FLHTCUSE5 - Scarlett Red Pearl & Dark Slate
Re: Muffler core Dyno Test! 2.25 vs 2.0 vs 1.75. Is bigger better?
« Reply #37 on: July 05, 2011, 03:21:59 PM »

Completed the install and map download yesterday.  Fullsac 110 Stage 1 is a wonderful product just as everyone says. Instant seat of the pants difference  :)
Also, unbelievable support from this forum.  Thanks to Steve & Alice from Fullsac and everyone on the forum that has helped me through the process. I highly recommend it as well.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All
 

Page created in 0.238 seconds with 25 queries.