I've thought about that as well but there might be a good reason for it. Is it possible that the design of that apparent choke point might be factored in on the total performance of the exhaust?
In other words, by allowing more exhaust to pass under to the left side muffler, could that perhaps actually reduce the performance of the crossover header design?
That would probably take some dyno testing to prove or disprove I'm sure.
Hi Guys!
That squashed pipe was one of the first things I replaced with a nice round one and dynoed. Zero gain. The stocker flows all the small 90 deg bend can flow.
Jesse, Your 1.75s are going out today.
Done a lot of testing with packing material. So has Harley. The stock layer against the outer wall in CVO mufflers is very effective in smoothing and reducing
the overall sound level. As a kid I put shag carpet and egg crates on the walls of the garage so we could crank the guitars and play the drums with out the
neighbors calling the cops. As an adult, my dyno room has got the same treatment is an effort to absorb as much sound as possible at the source.
Works the same with out the all pot smoke. Wrapping the cores themselfs will actualy restrict the sound waves from entering the can and reduce the
overall volume of the can, increasing the sound level until the material burns away. Wich it will do in a short period of time when exposed to the high temps
of the core itself. I hope this info helps to keep sound levels down.
If you need to refurbish your stock packing, The E bay link earlier in this thread is very high quality packing material at a fair price.
http://shop.ebay.com/ndangels/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_from=&_ipg=25Just purchased and used some myself to test. Good stuff! I'm attempting to source it and stock it. Anybody know the actual manufacture? Please PM me.
Thanks everyone for your continued support.
Steve George
Fullsac Performance