Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: The Dyno Difference  (Read 3710 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jarica

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 51

    • CVO1: 2010 Street Glide
The Dyno Difference
« on: May 10, 2010, 01:43:20 AM »

Today, I rode away from Ed Dahir's dyno shop, The Dyno Difference, with an incredibly smooth and more rideable 2010 CVO Street Glide.  Ed taught me an important lesson: A dyno is more than a tune.  It's a diagnostic tool that can tell us alot about what's going on with our bikes.  

The dyno tuning started on Friday when I took the bike to Ed's shop - a few weeks after Harley-Davidson of North Texas had installed Fullsac's X-Pipe (B), 2" core baffles and Steve George's TTS Mastertune fuel map.  Ed was halfway into the dyno tune when he stopped, due to very high AFR readings on the rear cylinder.  They were way out of sync with the AFRs on the front cylinder (which tuned just fine).  Ed concluded that the high AFRs were probably due to a rear fuel injector problem, which resulted in the rear cylinder not getting enough fuel and running very hot (ouch!  2,400+ miles on the rear cylinder under abnormally high AFRs - no wonder the bike was going into engine idle temperature management mode so often).  So, we called Harley-Davidson of North Texas and I made an appointment to get a new rear fuel injector installed on Saturday.  North Texas Harley installed the injector late Saturday afternoon and had me back on the road in no time flat (thanks to their excellent service department and techs).  

As it turned out, Ed was right on target with the fuel injector hypothesis.  Today, Ed was able to complete the dyno tune because he made an accurate diagnosis of the rear cylinder's AFR data from his dyno system.  The diagnostics changed everything.  As a result, my bike runs cooler, smoother and has plenty of low-end torque.

Here is a summary of the HP / TQ results:

- Before the dyno tune:  89.1 HP @ 5246 RPM / 111.1 ft lbs TQ @ 3263 RPM (Fullsac X-Pipe (B), Fullsac 2" core baffles, SE Ventilator, SE 255 cams)

- After the dyno tune:    93.2 HP @5196 RPM / 114.6 ft lbs TQ @3097 (Fullsac X-Pipe (B), Fullsac 2" core baffles, SE Ventilator, SE255 cams)

The numbers don't tell the real story.  Saving ther rear cylinder and the rideability of the bike do.

Thanks, Ed.  You went over the top working on Sunday!!

Rick
« Last Edit: May 15, 2010, 12:34:33 AM by jarica »
Logged
SE Ventilator
SE 255 Cams
Fullsac X-Pipe
Fullsac 2" Baffles
TTS Mastertune

Diamondback

  • Diamondback
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1176
Re: The Dyno Difference
« Reply #1 on: May 10, 2010, 07:24:10 AM »

 :2vrolijk_21:
Logged
2010 FXDFSE2 CVO Fat Bob, V&H staggers, Windshield, saddle bags, passenger back rest. 

2011 CVO Ultra Glide, Progressive Monotubes, Ultra 944's, Power Vision, ceramic headpipes, Cellset, Cee Baileys 15" and Fullsac 1.75"
Former 2009 SE Ultra, Rineharts, Stage I, PC V with autotune non cat header pipe
Former 2007 SE Ultra, D&D, Stage I, TMAT Metzlers
Former 2006 Dragonfly Ultra
Former 1999 Road King

BUBBLEHEAD

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 716

    • CVO1: 2021 FLTRXSE CVO Road Glide Bronze Armor
Re: The Dyno Difference
« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2010, 09:33:00 AM »

Glad he found that before you melted that rear. :2vrolijk_21: :2vrolijk_21:

Logged
 

Page created in 0.246 seconds with 25 queries.