don't get me wrong - I do respect other countries laws, traditions, habits and ethics - and other peoples views.
But as I for myself see it, shooting is a sport, in my country legally exercised on clay pidgeons only

Whereas hunting is a trade and game as life pidgeons or dove as you call them are in my country will only be legally shot at by skilled holders of a hunting licence obeying all ethnical and other standards of this ancient artisanry.
After those standards the hunter aims at individual creatures (whereas the shooter selects indiscriminate targets). The hunter will never let anybody else load his weapon or retrieve his prey as long as he's not handicapped. He will keep track of each and every creature he shot at and not aim on another one before he satisfied himself of the fate of his prey. So the hunter will never be able to spend anything near 1.000 rounds a day.
I'm perfectly well aware in other countries hunting is regarded as a sport and the difference between hunting and shooting hence without much significance any more. But you will realise hunting in all cultures originally was a trade and only modern firearms introduced "shooting sport".
I will not even try to force my view of this topic onto you or anybody else - I can't see a moral point in this matter and I don't believe my point of view to be in any respect "better" than anybody else's. But on the other hand I don't see a valid reason I should not even express my view of things and would very much appreciate if you would respect my traditions and views as much as I do respect yours.
Especially I would prefer not even hinting at "accidents" possibly to happen to people of adverse opinion on the range - as jokingly as this remark may be intended

In my overregulated country you might quite likely loose your license for such a remark - no joke.