Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2  All

Author Topic: Lowering Block vs Shorter Shock -- Pros/Cons  (Read 9242 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CTcvorider

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 95

    • CVO1: 2011 FLTRUSE
    • CVO2: 2010 R1200RT
    • CVO3: 1985 Ducati MHR Mille
Lowering Block vs Shorter Shock -- Pros/Cons
« on: October 08, 2010, 07:19:34 PM »

I currently have an '08 SECU that was lowered at purchase.  I'm 5'6" with 28" inseam.  I believe that the dealer put on 1" shorter shocks in back and shorter springs in the forks.  I've had no handling issues to speak of other than grinding the floorboards a lot (but I expect that I'd grind them no matter what when treating a touring bike like a sports bike).  I'm contemplating trading for an '11 SERG.  I've sat on one at the dealers and I feel a bit uncomfortable with the stock height.  If I go through with this, I'd plan on lowering the SERG too.

My question:  What are the pros/cons of using a lowering block approach with the stock length shocks as compared to getting a shorter length shock?  It seems to me that the advantage of the lowering block would be that I'd retain the travel of the stock shock. 

Anybody out there that's done both and can comment on the differences?
Logged

mjb765

  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6808

    • CVO1: 2011 FLHXSE--sold
    • CVO2: 2015 FLHXSE--sold
    • CVO3: 2018 FLTRXSE
Re: Lowering Block vs Shorter Shock -- Pros/Cons
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2010, 08:59:56 PM »

I can't speak from personal experience, but the new Progressive 940's have the same travel as a stock 13" shock, but lower the bike to the equivalent of a 12" shock. Going lower than a 12"--I have tried this---gives you ground clearance issues and the biek bottoms out too easily. Other than that, have you looked into a lower seat?
Logged

sadunbar

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11416
  • EBCM # Stealth - SSBS # 1.1 - SoA # Z&E2525 .01%
    • IL


    • CVO1: 2007 FLHTCUSE2
    • CVO2: 2000 FXR4
Re: Lowering Block vs Shorter Shock -- Pros/Cons
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2010, 09:09:52 PM »

I run 1" lowered Traxxion front fork cartridges and Legend Air Suspension in the rear.  The Legends on the rear of the bike allow me to raise or lower it by several inches with the push of a button.  This allows me to drop the bike when my feet need to be on the ground and raise the bike when riding, maintaining full shock travel...  The Legends combined with the Traxxion fork cartridges provide a great ride....


http://www.arnottairsuspension.com/products/productDetails.asp?groupId=157

http://www.legendsuspensions.com/Products.aspx

http://www.traxxion.com/AK-20AxxionCartridgeKit_Harley-Davidson.aspx
Logged
2007 Screamin Eagle Ultra Classic - Light Candy Cherry and Black Ice
Screamin Eagle 120r
Revolution Performance EMS
Fuel Moto Jackpot headpipes and 4.5" Pro Touring Mufflers
HPI 55mm Throttle Body w/5.3 injectors
BDL clutch w/VPC92T
Traxxion AK-20
Legend Air Suspension
Brembo Brake Calipers/Rotors
Garmin Zumo
575 Chubby's
Bushtec Quantum

cahdbiker

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 932

    • CVO1: FLHTCUSE4
Re: Lowering Block vs Shorter Shock -- Pros/Cons
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2010, 09:52:47 PM »

CTcvorider, I had my stock seat modified, and it got my feet a lot closer to the ground. The upholster installed memory foam and of course reinstalled the heater in the seat. The passenger seat was not modified. I made a post with a picture in the "discussions for Ultra Classic section ". I had put the street glide shocks in when I first got my bike in Aug 08 (it is a 09SEUC), but the money I spent to have the seat modified was well spent compared to to the shocks although they did lower the bike a little. The upholster lowered my seat and made it a little more narrow in the front. Good Luck. CAHDBIKER
Logged

2009 SEUC just south of Point Mugu Ventura County, Ca.

LRebel

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3055
Re: Lowering Block vs Shorter Shock -- Pros/Cons
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2010, 11:15:39 PM »

I have used the lowering shackles or blocks.  You are right, in that you maintain the stock shock travel.  The only problem I had with them was that the pair I used lowered the bike a little too much.  It was fine with just me on the bike.  With my BSR on back and my Bushtec trailer hooked up, the rear tire would hit the fender on hard bumps.

I then spent $$$ for an Arnott Air Ride system.  I can't speak about the Legend Air system, but IMO, don't waste your money on the Arnott system.  The Arnott is way too stiff with just me on the bike... on rough Oklahoma roads (and believe me they are rough), some of the bumps are painful and I worry about damaging something on the bike.  I have tried to vary the air pressure, but doesn't help.  It's not bad with the BSR on back and the trailer hooked up, but I only ride that way when we are on a long trip.

Anyway, I am about to pull the Arnott shocks off.  May try some Progressive shocks..... or may just put the stock shocks back on and use the other bike for trips pulling the trailer.
Logged

grc

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14216
  • AKA Grouchy Old Fart
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2005 SEEG2
Re: Lowering Block vs Shorter Shock -- Pros/Cons
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2010, 09:56:24 AM »


I strongly suggest that you leave the suspension mods alone until you have exhausted the other "fixes" available.  First, as noted earlier, consider a thinner, narrower rider seat.  Second, get some riding boots with a nice thick high traction sole, to help with manuevering the bike.  If you still need more after that, then consider a good aftermarket shock and fork kit combination.  Call some of the places like Works Performance, Progressive, etc. and ask for recommendations.  Avoid anything that sounds to good to be true at a super low price, like many of the so-called lowering block kits.  Anyone can buy a drill press and a batch of metal blocks and go into business making those kits.  Stick with a properly engineered shock and fork combination designed for your bike.

BTW, I wouldn't waste my money on the 1" lower air shocks from H-D.


Jerry
Logged
Jerry - 2005 Cherry SEEG  -  Member # 1155

H-D and me  -  a classic love / hate relationship.  Current score:  love 40, hate 50, bewildered 10.

bf2002flht

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 84
  • for sale
Re: Lowering Block vs Shorter Shock -- Pros/Cons
« Reply #6 on: October 12, 2010, 06:09:11 PM »

The lowering blocks change the angle of the shock, defeating the engineering that went into them. You change the angle of the shock, it's not going to perform like it was ment to. 
Logged

BADBAGG

  • Vendor
  • Senior CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 423

    • CVO1: 2009 FLTRSE3 O/B D& D Fat Cat , SE 259E Cams , High Compression Pistons , TTS Mastertune, Yaffe Monkeys bars , Yaffe Monkey engine guard , Kenwood DVD/CD radio 650 watts 7 speakers. C & C solo seat , Motorcycle Armor, Klock Werks 8" windsheild,30 tooth pulley
Re: Lowering Block vs Shorter Shock -- Pros/Cons
« Reply #7 on: October 12, 2010, 09:37:23 PM »

I have the lowering blocks on my SERG. I have had no issues solo or 2 up. IMO there was no noticeable change in the ride. I liked them so much , put them on the wife's Street Glide. $ 100.00 is alot cheaper than shocks..... With all that said , you have to do whatever you are most comfortable with. It's your scoot.......
Logged

LRebel

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3055
Re: Lowering Block vs Shorter Shock -- Pros/Cons
« Reply #8 on: October 13, 2010, 04:51:01 PM »

I have the lowering blocks on my SERG. I have had no issues solo or 2 up. IMO there was no noticeable change in the ride. I liked them so much , put them on the wife's Street Glide. $ 100.00 is alot cheaper than shocks..... With all that said , you have to do whatever you are most comfortable with. It's your scoot.......

Agree.  With the lowering blocks you don't sacrifice the range of travel on the shocks.  And, there is something to be said for lowering the center of gravity and being able to safely get your feet firmly on the ground... just sayin  ;)
Logged

Hogg

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2
  • 08 SE CVO Limited 105th Anniversary,SERT,Dynoed
Re: Lowering Block vs Shorter Shock -- Pros/Cons
« Reply #9 on: December 22, 2013, 12:11:28 PM »

LRebel what lowering blocks are you using, I would like to try them. 2008 SE Anniversary
Logged
Hoggin the Left Lane

rcamp2009

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 264
    • OH

Re: Lowering Block vs Shorter Shock -- Pros/Cons
« Reply #10 on: December 23, 2013, 10:37:14 AM »

I have blocks on my FLHXSE3 with stock shocks. I noticed no difference in ride. Lot easier to move around and looks better. However, if you are a spirited rider. You will rub the boards more often. I have ridden the Dragon several times with no problem. I have rubbed the boards. However if I got into the board mounts it would go back up.
Logged
2019 FLHXSE
Ghost

Hogg

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2
  • 08 SE CVO Limited 105th Anniversary,SERT,Dynoed
Re: Lowering Block vs Shorter Shock -- Pros/Cons
« Reply #11 on: December 23, 2013, 10:52:41 AM »

What is the name brand of lowering blocks you are using
Logged
Hoggin the Left Lane

Grizzly

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3010
    • ON


    • CVO1: '05 Jalapeno 1 of 692 sold
    • CVO2: '08 Duracell #601 of 1,800
Re: Lowering Block vs Shorter Shock -- Pros/Cons
« Reply #12 on: December 23, 2013, 12:20:01 PM »

I currently have an '08 SECU that was lowered at purchase.  I'm 5'6" with 28" inseam.  I believe that the dealer put on 1" shorter shocks in back and shorter springs in the forks.  I've had no handling issues to speak of other than grinding the floorboards a lot (but I expect that I'd grind them no matter what when treating a touring bike like a sports bike).  I'm contemplating trading for an '11 SERG.  I've sat on one at the dealers and I feel a bit uncomfortable with the stock height.  If I go through with this, I'd plan on lowering the SERG too.

My question:  What are the pros/cons of using a lowering block approach with the stock length shocks as compared to getting a shorter length shock?  It seems to me that the advantage of the lowering block would be that I'd retain the travel of the stock shock.  

Anybody out there that's done both and can comment on the differences?

Keep in mind that the '09's and later models sit higher to begin with to allow for the pipe to be routed under the frame... So, even with the same front and rear lowering kit you have on your '08 installed on an 2011, the bike will still sit higher than you're used to.  As others have mentioned, modifying the seat will also be needed.

« Last Edit: December 23, 2013, 12:30:14 PM by Grizzly »
Logged
ALL 10 Provinces & ALL Lower 48 States ridden on "MY" bike

              NW Territories and Alaska, here I come!

Chains

  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8465
  • 2006 FLHTCUSE
    • FL

Re: Lowering Block vs Shorter Shock -- Pros/Cons
« Reply #13 on: December 23, 2013, 02:52:46 PM »

In the past when I have lowered front and rear on my bikes, it messed up ground clearance and handling, looked cool sitting still (big deal).  The last one I lowered the rear and left the front the factory height and it handled better.  Now I would follow grc's advice and exhaust all other avenues prior to lowering.
Logged
2009 FLHTCUSE
12 inch Monkey bars
Stage one kit
Fullsac SS titanium coated DX dual pipe
Kuryakyn 4 inch Mellow Crushers
Color Matched Bushtec Turbo 2
1st Active member of the CVO Critter Gawkers Society
Pages: [1] 2  All
 

Page created in 0.21 seconds with 20 queries.