The Fullsac 2" baffles produce a good deal of lower-frequency sound when you get on it, but are fairly quiet at idle. If you leave the packing in, as I did, it removes most of the high-frequency "ringing"-type tones, leaving only the low frequency tones, which sound really good, and travel further. The 1.75" baffles are quieter, and the 2.25" baffles are louder.
If you have a ringing exhaust that produces a lot of higher-frequency tones, such as pipes without any packing or heaven-forbid unbaffled pipes, a Tour Pak will keep many of the hiogher-frequency sounds from reaching the rider, so you would notice more of a difference with the Tour Pak on. i noticed this on my old Evo FLHTP that had unbaffled fishtails... they were MUCH louder to me with the Tour Pak off than they were with it on. However, the Fullsac baffles with the packing left in the pipes do not produce many higher-frequency tones anyway, so you probably wouldn't notice much difference with or without the Tour Pak on. Without the packing, you might notice more difference in the sound that reaches the rider with the Tour Pak on and off. I think the Fullsac baffles sound better with the packing left in - because they produce a really nice, rumbling low-frequency sound without the higher-frequency ringing or tinniness. You really don't want much high-frequency sound in your exhaust. It doesn't sound very good...
If you've ever been to a parade and heard a marching band a good distance away - you always hear the boom of the bass drums and the sousaphones before you hear the trumpets, etc. This is because higher-frequency sounds are more easily attenuated by obstructions, whereas lower-frequency sounds aren't attenuated as much. It's also why humpback whales can communicate with each other using ultra-low-frequency sounds over many miles of ocean water. Higher-frequency sounds would be very quickly attenuated.
This concludes today's lesson.
-- Mr. Science Dude