Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3  All

Author Topic: Progressive Monotube with 940's Question  (Read 7821 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

knothead

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 558

    • CVO1: 2009 R-Glide Orange & Black
    • CVO2: 2006 V-Rod Orange & Black
    • CVO3: 2006 V- Rod Destroyer Orange & Black
Re: Progressive Monotube with 940's Question
« Reply #15 on: February 25, 2012, 06:26:44 PM »

I installed the 940's a couple of months ago, Progressive advertises it will lower 1'' but the don't....so your leveling will remain the same.

My shocks rubbed the bags, so after riding a few miles make sure you check..
« Last Edit: February 26, 2012, 09:28:37 AM by knothead »
Logged
Letz Ride

Banana man

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1020

    • CVO1: 2005 seeg banana
Re: Progressive Monotube with 940's Question
« Reply #16 on: February 25, 2012, 11:53:44 PM »

JR, I put the standard height monotubes and 940's on my banana. I wanted to raise
the bike back up for more cornering clearance. The front is now noticeably higher than
the rear. My headlights now shine farther down the road on low beam and get bright lighted
by auto's sometimes. I also no longer drag the boards in the turns. :2vrolijk_21:
Logged

TexasBowhunter

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 335
  • 09 Street Glide
Re: Progressive Monotube with 940's Question
« Reply #17 on: February 26, 2012, 08:32:27 PM »

So let me ask a stupid question here about the 940's
You say they are 13" eye 2 eye
You loss 1" when you sit on the bike
so now there is 2" worth of travel in the rear end?
paul
Logged
Ride safe

JR

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4902
  • Be Still and Know that I AM God
    • TN


    • CVO1: 2012 ULTRA FLHTCUSE7
    • CVO2: 2005 SEEG FLHTCSE2
    • CVO3: 2000 SERG FLTRSEI
    • photobucket.com
Re: Progressive Monotube with 940's Question
« Reply #18 on: February 26, 2012, 08:56:13 PM »

So let me ask a stupid question here about the 940's
You say they are 13" eye 2 eye
You loss 1" when you sit on the bike
so now there is 2" worth of travel in the rear end?
paul

Paul, that is a good question. I thought my SEEG was 12" and they came 1" lowered front and back. My 12 CUSE sits higher. Especially noticeable when I first got on my Yellow Jacket and came to a light and put my feet down. :o I figured they were 13" eye to eye since that's what the Progressive site says about the 940's. You spurred my curiosity so I measured my rear shocks on my Yellow Jacket and they were 12 1/2" with 30 psi of air in them so they are probably 12" with no air. I guess the difference in height comes from the larger rear tire and seat on my new bike! :nixweiss: Anyway I should be good since I'm going with the standard height monotubes. Thanks for asking a good question! :2vrolijk_21:
Logged

TexasBowhunter

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 335
  • 09 Street Glide
Re: Progressive Monotube with 940's Question
« Reply #19 on: February 27, 2012, 10:25:35 AM »

I must be slow
I still can't grasp what progressive is saying here

"Specifically designed to deliver a comfortable ride at a 1" lowered stance. Built around our "Best in Class" IAS technology, The Ultra Touring shocks utilize all the suspension travel provided by these 13" eye to eye units, but provide a 1" lowered ride height. The unique Ultra Touring spring combination not only delivers a lowered ride height while its being ridden, but also while its on the side stand."

they are 13" oval
They give the bike a lower stance when ridden and when its on its stand
So how much travel do they have total?
Whats the lighter spring used for? To me it doesn't seem to serve any purpose...
I may not be seeing the full picture here so please excuse my slowness...
paul
Logged
Ride safe

Midnight Rider

  • AKA: TCnBham
  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11107
  • FLHRSEI.ORG

    • CVO1: 2011 SERGU Rio Red (sold)
Re: Progressive Monotube with 940's Question
« Reply #20 on: February 27, 2012, 10:41:56 AM »

JR,

Refill forks with SE fork oil,,, nice improvement, takes the "dive" effect out and handles slightly better too.  :2vrolijk_21:

Ride for the Son

With the Progressive Monotubes, that is not a good idea.  The SE fork oil is a higher viscosity than recommended for the monotubes or any other full cartridge front fork.  In a stock fork, the SE oil will indeed take some of the dive out of the front end, but at the expense of overall ride quality.  You take away what little responsiveness the stock forks are capable of with heavier weight oil.  For example, the ability of the fork to absorb a sharp edged bump in the road, like is so common when going from the road surface to a bridge's surface.
Logged
Sometimes it takes a whole tankful of fuel before you can think straight.
I had the right to remain silent, just not the ability...

Gone, but not forgotten...2011 FLTRUSE with
Fullsac X Pipe w/2" Baffles
Legend Air Ride Rear Shocks
Traxxion Dynamics AK-20 Front Suspension
Clearview GT13 Windshield
TTS Mastertune

Mr D

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1897
    • WI

Re: Progressive Monotube with 940's Question
« Reply #21 on: February 27, 2012, 11:00:40 AM »

With the Progressive Monotubes, that is not a good idea.  The SE fork oil is a higher viscosity than recommended for the monotubes or any other full cartridge front fork.  In a stock fork, the SE oil will indeed take some of the dive out of the front end, but at the expense of overall ride quality.  You take away what little responsiveness the stock forks are capable of with heavier weight oil.  For example, the ability of the fork to absorb a sharp edged bump in the road, like is so common when going from the road surface to a bridge's surface.

 :2vrolijk_21:
Logged
2014 FLHRSE6 Orange/Black
2012 FLHXSE3 Ruby/Typhoon [Sold]
2007 SEUC2 Red/Blk [Sold]
2006 SEUC Haze/Black [Sold]
2005 SEEG Yellow [Sold]
2003 VRSCA [Sold]
"I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me"
Phil 4:13

naitram

  • SMF Administrator
  • 10K CVO Member
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12667
    • MA


    • CVO1: FLTRXSE2 "Marvin"
Re: Progressive Monotube with 940's Question
« Reply #22 on: February 27, 2012, 11:03:46 AM »

I must be slow
I still can't grasp what progressive is saying here

"Specifically designed to deliver a comfortable ride at a 1" lowered stance. Built around our "Best in Class" IAS technology, The Ultra Touring shocks utilize all the suspension travel provided by these 13" eye to eye units, but provide a 1" lowered ride height. The unique Ultra Touring spring combination not only delivers a lowered ride height while its being ridden, but also while its on the side stand."

they are 13" oval
They give the bike a lower stance when ridden and when its on its stand
So how much travel do they have total?
Whats the lighter spring used for? To me it doesn't seem to serve any purpose...
I may not be seeing the full picture here so please excuse my slowness...
paul


it sits like a 12" the light spring will allow the shock to uncompress the extra inch back to 13" during rebound
Logged
:cool26: naitram...


"I reject your reality and substitute my own."
"Work is the curse of the drinking class."

Hotrod50

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 745

    • CVO1: 2009 FLTRSE3 Yellow
Re: Progressive Monotube with 940's Question
« Reply #23 on: February 27, 2012, 05:27:39 PM »

I installed the 940's a couple of months ago, Progressive advertises it will lower 1'' but the don't....so your leveling will remain the same.

My shocks rubbed the bags, so after riding a few miles make sure you check..
What did you do about the rubbing problem?
Logged
2009 FLTRSE3  Yellow
<img src="http://chart.apis.google.com/chart?cht=t&chtm=usa&chs=440x220&chf=bg,s,336699&chco=d0d0d0,cc0000&chd=s:9999999999999999&chld=AZARCACOKSMOMTNENVNMOKSDNDTXUTWY" width="440" height="220" >
visited 16 states (32%)
Create your own visited map of The United States or Free iphone travel guide

ultrafxr

  • There are no sure answers, only better questions. - Dick Van Dyke
  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5467
  • No problem is so small it cannot be misunderstood.
    • TN


    • CVO1: 2020 FLHTCUTG Tahitian Teal
    • CVO2: 2017 FLHTKSE Palladium Silver/Phantom Blue/Wicked Sapphire-traded
    • CVO3: 2012 FLHTCUSE7 Electric Orange/Black Diamond-traded
Re: Progressive Monotube with 940's Question
« Reply #24 on: February 27, 2012, 05:29:21 PM »

With the Progressive Monotubes, that is not a good idea.  The SE fork oil is a higher viscosity than recommended for the monotubes or any other full cartridge front fork.  In a stock fork, the SE oil will indeed take some of the dive out of the front end, but at the expense of overall ride quality.  You take away what little responsiveness the stock forks are capable of with heavier weight oil.  For example, the ability of the fork to absorb a sharp edged bump in the road, like is so common when going from the road surface to a bridge's surface.
Terry, I don't know how much (if any) difference the oil makes when using the Progressive Monotubes.  Progressive told me the cartridges are sealed units with gas and do not use oil for damening.  The only function of the fork oil when using the Progressvie Monotubes is to provide lubrication for the moving parts.
Logged



Places ridden on my bike from my driveway.
IBA member # 45520

JR

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4902
  • Be Still and Know that I AM God
    • TN


    • CVO1: 2012 ULTRA FLHTCUSE7
    • CVO2: 2005 SEEG FLHTCSE2
    • CVO3: 2000 SERG FLTRSEI
    • photobucket.com
Re: Progressive Monotube with 940's Question
« Reply #25 on: February 27, 2012, 07:05:52 PM »

I sent an email to Progressive Saturday and asked if I can use the Standard height 31-2500 Monotubes with the 940's on my FLHTCUSE7 without any handling issues or should I go with the lowered Monotubes. Here is his reply:

If you do not need to lower the front end much for your personal interests what I would do is run the 940 on the rear and the standard 31-2500 on the front and leave out the preload spacers. That will drop the front end about 1/2 inch and set it up perfect and it rides really great.

Frank van Es
Inside Sales Manager
Progressive Suspension
714-523-8700 EXT 259

Again it's too late to call but I have some questions. First, when you go to Progressive site and click on "what fits my ride", it shows 13" shocks but it doesn't show Screamin Eagle models. It groups FLH and FLT together, even when I type in my 05 SEEG which I know had 1" lowered from factory. I figured my shocks on my 12 CUSE was 13" some here have said there 12". Does anyone know for sure?  :nixweiss: I call Progressive tomorrow and see what he says.

 :bananarock:
Logged

naitram

  • SMF Administrator
  • 10K CVO Member
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12667
    • MA


    • CVO1: FLTRXSE2 "Marvin"
Re: Progressive Monotube with 940's Question
« Reply #26 on: February 27, 2012, 07:13:30 PM »

JR that's the setup i have. the full height front tubes without the spacers. and 940's in the back.

i barley scraped anything on the dragon with that setup. where in the past with lowered front and rear i used to shoot sparks through every curve.
Logged
:cool26: naitram...


"I reject your reality and substitute my own."
"Work is the curse of the drinking class."

JR

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4902
  • Be Still and Know that I AM God
    • TN


    • CVO1: 2012 ULTRA FLHTCUSE7
    • CVO2: 2005 SEEG FLHTCSE2
    • CVO3: 2000 SERG FLTRSEI
    • photobucket.com
Re: Progressive Monotube with 940's Question
« Reply #27 on: February 27, 2012, 07:17:40 PM »

JR that's the setup i have. the full height front tubes without the spacers. and 940's in the back.

i barley scraped anything on the dragon with that setup. where in the past with lowered front and rear i used to shoot sparks through every curve.

Thank ya! Thank ya! That's the info I was looking for! :2vrolijk_21:
Logged

Fired00d

  • Global Moderator
  • 25K CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 32641
  • Orange & Black SEEG... Can it get any better?
    • VA


    • CVO1: FLHTCSE
Re: Progressive Monotube with 940's Question
« Reply #28 on: February 27, 2012, 07:25:13 PM »

JR that's the setup i have. the full height front tubes without the spacers. and 940's in the back.

i barley scraped anything on the dragon with that setup. where in the past with lowered front and rear i used to shoot sparks through every curve.
He sure has. :nervous:

 :pumpkin:
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 :fireman:
Logged
:pumpkin: 2004 Screamin’ Eagle Electra Glide :pumpkin:
Rinehart True Duals
SE Breather
SE Race Tuner
HogTunes Speakers
Zippers 575 Gear Drive Cams
Zippers Pro-Tapered Adjustable Push Rods
Zippers Oil Pressure Bypass Shim
Feuling Oil Pump
Feuling Lifters
Zumo 550 W/Flame Caps
Lyndall Z+ Brake Pads
CVOHarley Member #1234
PGR Member #754 (Since '05)
Proud Member EBCM #2.0

sled dog

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 37
Re: Progressive Monotube with 940's Question
« Reply #29 on: March 05, 2012, 08:57:01 PM »

 Jr,

Not trying to jack your thread but can someone tell me if the 940's ride significantly better than OEM's? I'm considering new rear shocks for my 2011 and would appreciate any feedback.  Thanks in advance.


Jerry
Logged
2011 FLTRUSE Rio Red/Slate Black
Fullsac X-pipe 2.25" cores TTS Mastertune

2008 FLTR 103 V&H True Duals
Custom Solo Seat
Pages: 1 [2] 3  All
 

Page created in 0.181 seconds with 21 queries.