www.CVOHARLEY.com

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]  All

Author Topic: 96/103/110 Quick Comparison  (Read 4344 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CVOJOE

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2884
  • Life's a journey, why not enjoy the ride?
Re: 96/103/110 Quick Comparison
« Reply #15 on: July 23, 2006, 12:49:28 PM »
[highlight]
Quote
One more change to add, the torque of the 103 hits at 4000 rpm, not 3500.  That's why the six will work great in the 110, but not so well in a 103.[/quote[/highlight]]

Artic,
The spec sheets I have for the 03 SERK & 04 SEEG say 100ft lbs @ 3500, however the 06 FLSTFSE2 says 96 ftlbs@4000. Can't find my sheets for 05 right now.Did they go up to 4000rpm  ?
Joe
Logged
2003 FLHRSEI2. (Sold) :(

Horsepower is how fast you hit a wall.Torque is how far you will take the wall with you.

arcticdude

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1544
  • FLHRSEI.ORG
Re: 96/103/110 Quick Comparison
« Reply #16 on: July 23, 2006, 07:03:31 PM »
That's what's listed on the moco website. [smiley=nixweiss.gif]
Logged
don't waste your time with a usa-spec ipod adapter- chitty products with chitty support

CVOJOE

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2884
  • Life's a journey, why not enjoy the ride?
Re: 96/103/110 Quick Comparison
« Reply #17 on: July 24, 2006, 01:55:27 PM »
Yep, says 4000 RPM for 2005's. Strange since supposedly all 103's come stock with the same cam set. Guesssing it has something to do with the ECU MAP or ?
Logged
2003 FLHRSEI2. (Sold) :(

Horsepower is how fast you hit a wall.Torque is how far you will take the wall with you.
Pages: 1 [2]  All
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.211 seconds with 21 queries.