Topic: Which compression should you be looking at for motor build STATIC or CORRECTED (Read 1465 times)

SE113 · « **on:** December 07, 2012, 06:40:05 AM »

Static Compression Vs Corrected compression with should i really be looking at on a engine build. If im using a cam that its best performance is 10:2.1 and after engine build with head work done to give me 10:2 Static and after cam is calculated in, I only have 9:4.1 Corrected. I need to understand the differance between the 2 a little better

cherryseeg2 · « **Reply #1 on:** December 07, 2012, 08:13:58 AM »

http://www.hemrickperformance.com/Pages/dynamiccompression.aspx

Here's some reading. There's LOTS more out there but this should get you started.

HILLSIDECYCLE.COM · « **Reply #2 on:** December 09, 2012, 07:05:52 AM »

Nothing wrong with 9.3-9.4 corrected.
Scott

prodrag1320 · « **Reply #3 on:** December 11, 2012, 07:53:13 PM »

when starting a build,shooting for static compression is a good way to figure how different cams are going to work,then once the cam is chosen,corrected compression can be calculated (this can also be done backwards,figuring corrected first,then matching cams,but i wouldnt recommend it) if anyone wants to put build idea`s thru one of our engine programs,email me at veetwinracing@hotmail.com (scotts right,nothing wrong with mid 9.0 corrected compression)

Author Topic: Which compression should you be looking at for motor build STATIC or CORRECTED (Read 1465 times)

SE113

Which compression should you be looking at for motor build STATIC or CORRECTED

cherryseeg2

Re: Which compression should you be looking at for motor build STATIC or CORRECTED

HILLSIDECYCLE.COM

Re: Which compression should you be looking at for motor build STATIC or CORRECTED

prodrag1320

Re: Which compression should you be looking at for motor build STATIC or CORRECTED