www.CVOHARLEY.com

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]  All

Author Topic: Whats the better choice?  (Read 8384 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bob2002

  • Retired
  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 169
  • FLHRSEI.ORG
Re: Whats the better choice?
« Reply #15 on: January 17, 2013, 08:21:53 AM »
Have you looked at the Andrews 21 cams?
Logged
2012 Ultra Limited,V&H VO2 Intake,Wood 222 Cams,Cobra Power Port Header,CVO Mufflers,TTS Tuner
AMSOIL DEALER SINCE 1985

TorqueInc

  • Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. Mark Twain
  • Vendor
  • Senior CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 391
Re: Whats the better choice?
« Reply #16 on: January 18, 2013, 09:57:38 PM »
Avoid the 255 !!!
Logged
2011 SG Sedona Orange 105" 125/123

www.jwperf.com

dayne66

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4044
    • BC


    • CVO1: '12 Ruby/Typhoon SG
    • CVO2: '15 Superior Blue FLD Switchback
Re: Whats the better choice?
« Reply #17 on: January 18, 2013, 10:31:54 PM »
Quote from: TorqueInc on January 18, 2013, 09:57:38 PM
Avoid the 255 !!!
For any reason in particular?
Logged
"The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing." Socrates

TorqueInc

  • Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. Mark Twain
  • Vendor
  • Senior CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 391
Re: Whats the better choice?
« Reply #18 on: January 18, 2013, 11:37:33 PM »
 It is an emissions cam,creates far too much heat,low end torque with very little else  :thumbsdown:

 
Logged
2011 SG Sedona Orange 105" 125/123

www.jwperf.com

Tn.Heritage

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 85
Re: Whats the better choice?
« Reply #19 on: January 19, 2013, 09:31:18 AM »
I really don't understand why alot of people overlook the SE 204's. They have the best of both worlds imo. And if you want more lift put on some 1.75 rockers. I'll post my 96" Dyno run with 204's and Power Duals with a SEST tuner. Then I'll post a 103" 2013 with HD CC heads and 1.75 rockers. I just think this is a very under rated cam but if I wasn't running this one it would be the TW222's next choice.
Logged
2019 Limited Low 114, S&S 475 cam, PR's, LC's, lifters,S&S Sidewinder 2-n-1 with a Roland Sands AC. Tuned with a PV tuner at J&B Performance.

Tn.Heritage

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 85
Re: Whats the better choice?
« Reply #20 on: January 19, 2013, 09:33:39 AM »
Sorry but had to go to another post to get the 96" with 204 cam's dyno on.
Logged
2019 Limited Low 114, S&S 475 cam, PR's, LC's, lifters,S&S Sidewinder 2-n-1 with a Roland Sands AC. Tuned with a PV tuner at J&B Performance.

HILLSIDECYCLE.COM

  • Banned
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2085
Re: Whats the better choice?
« Reply #21 on: January 20, 2013, 08:30:46 PM »
We've seen some remarkable results with a Wood 6, and a 4* advance sprocket, in those 96"ers.
Scoyy
Logged

firehog383

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 93
    • WA

Re: Whats the better choice?
« Reply #22 on: January 28, 2013, 06:29:00 PM »
The woods TW-5 cam pulls hard I had one in my 103 and really liked it, maybe one of the tuners could share some results they have had compared to the 255
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.212 seconds with 21 queries.