IMHO it's two different ways to achieve the same goal, with one caveat. Adding just the ClutchWiz without also upgrading the spring will degrade the torque capacity of the clutch (it can slip under heavy load), so it's not quite as simple as it may seem. And with the AIM device you will need to go the other way with the spring to maximize the lever effort reduction. Also not quite as simple as it may seem.
For those with hand size or grip strength issues, one or the other is a good choice as long as you understand the limitations.
Jerry
You're right, Jerry... there are always limitations! Someone needs to find a way around these pesky laws of physics!
I ran the AIM VP70T VPC for about 5000 miles, and experienced the rather quick wear down of the fulcrum points and subsequent reduction in its lever pull effort reduction effectiveness, as I've documented in my mods thread. Also, as I mentioned to Wiz until he was tired of hearing it, the rattling noise that the VPC made in my primary was driving me absolutely nuts.
I needled Wiz into letting me participate as a sort of beta tester for the ClutchWIZ during the time he was developing it. He found that a stronger clutch spring was needed, so I installed the 480 lb spring from AIM. But due to the fulcrum point placement of the ClutchWIZ to reduce the lever pull effort, even that strong spring wasn't preventing all clutch slippage on the Honey Badger when I really got on it.
So, I installed the extra plate kit from Energy One, and that fixed the slipping for good. So now I run the ClutchWIZ, the AIM 480 lb clutch spring, and the Energy One extra plate kit and I'm very happy. As I said above, we have measured my clutch lever pull effort at 9.8 lbs - easy enough to pull with two fingers, and similar to the lever pull effort the VP70T provided when it was brand new.
Note that the AIM VP84T and VP92T are designed to handle progressively more power - but each provides lesser amounts of clutch lever pull effort reduction.
Ken