Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2  All

Author Topic: Balanced 110  (Read 3498 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

2 ROSE

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 702
    • PA


    • CVO1: 2012 CVO Convertible aka “Rose”...my one and only.
Balanced 110
« on: August 22, 2014, 11:13:02 PM »

Hey you guys,
I ride a 2012 cvo convertible with the 110B engine...the B I assume standing for balanced. I am not real mechanically inclined when it comes to the inner workings of motorcycle engines let alone a Harley engine so my question is this. Besides a smooth idle what are the advantages of of the 110B, if any, over the more common unbalanced engine. Just from observation I can see the excess vibration of the touring models...hell a lot of the times it looks as though the damn horn is going to shake right off the bike. And if the 110B is more advantageous than the non balanced then why don't they make all the 110 engines balanced???
I apologize in advance if the above is a stupid question...I just don't know.   :nixweiss:
Logged

kojak

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1277
Re: Balanced 110
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2014, 02:28:30 AM »

Touring engines are rubber mounted to dampen vibration. Softail engines are hard mounted so Harley has internal balancers on those so the B designation.
Logged
kojak
2022 CVO RGL
2022 Apex FLTRK Traded
2021 CVO Limited Bronze Armor Sold
2019 RGS Billiard Blue Traded
2017 CVO Limited Spiked Olive Traded
2016 CVO SG Stardust Traded
2013 CVO RG Atomic Orange Sold
2010 CVO SG Cobalt Sold
2007 CVO RK Blue Traded
2005 CVO EG Teal Traded
And some 20 other bikes over 45 years

skratch

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2003
    • LA

    • CVO1: 2013 FLTRXSE2 Roman Gold/Burnt Emerald
Re: Balanced 110
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2014, 06:02:24 AM »

Just from observation I can see the excess vibration of the touring models...hell a lot of the times it looks as though the damn horn is going to shake right off the bike. And if the 110B is more advantageous than the non balanced then why don't they make all the 110 engines balanced???

the 'b' engine is not necessarily more advantageous, just a different animal as kojak mentioned.  the touring engines do vibrate.  at idle.  once you give it some throttle, they smooth right out.  and at higher rpms, they are smoother than the 'b' engines.
Logged
I understand the concept of reality, but find it too confining as a way of life

ultrafxr

  • There are no sure answers, only better questions. - Dick Van Dyke
  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5477
  • No problem is so small it cannot be misunderstood.
    • TN


    • CVO1: 2020 FLHTCUTG Tahitian Teal
    • CVO2: 2017 FLHTKSE Palladium Silver/Phantom Blue/Wicked Sapphire-traded
    • CVO3: 2012 FLHTCUSE7 Electric Orange/Black Diamond-traded
Re: Balanced 110
« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2014, 07:31:21 AM »

The 'balancers' the moco adds to smooth out the B engine adds more weight to the lower end.  More mass to move, lower max rpm, and I imagine more expensive to manufacture.  As the previous post said it is to keep the engine tolerably smooth since it is rigid mounted to the frame and all vibrations are telegraphed to the rider.
Logged



Places ridden on my bike from my driveway.
IBA member # 45520

2 ROSE

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 702
    • PA


    • CVO1: 2012 CVO Convertible aka “Rose”...my one and only.
Re: Balanced 110
« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2014, 08:38:57 AM »

Well I guess that answers that. I was expecting something like...it cost more to install a balanced engine and the moco is too cheap to install them in all of their high end rides...or something like that.
Thanks guys for the info.
Logged

grc

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14216
  • AKA Grouchy Old Fart
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2005 SEEG2
Re: Balanced 110
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2014, 09:08:11 AM »


Take a ride on a EVO equipped Softail and you will rapidly see why Harley added the internal balancer feature to the Twin Cam.  They could have redesigned the frame and rubber mounted the engine like the Touring bikes, but rigid mounting is actually advantageous for more precise tracking and handling.  Many of the strange handling issues with the Touring bikes since 1980 are directly related to and caused by the rubber mounting system Harley used on those bikes.  So there are tradeoffs either way.

Jerry
Logged
Jerry - 2005 Cherry SEEG  -  Member # 1155

H-D and me  -  a classic love / hate relationship.  Current score:  love 40, hate 50, bewildered 10.

Dan_Lockwood

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2498
Re: Balanced 110
« Reply #6 on: August 23, 2014, 09:42:58 AM »

GM has been using counter balance shafts in all their 90 degree V-6 motors since the mid '80s.  Believe me, without them they shook and vibrated badly.  I'm sure the other manufacturers use similar technology.  Buick had their 231ci, most recently their 3800, and it was a vibrating fool until I believe '85.  GM started with their 305 V-8 cut down to a 6 cylinder at 200ci, and then they up'd it to a 229ci from a V-8 350.  These were not great motors and when Buick had their 231, 3.8, 3800, it became their corporate motor for multiple lines.

They don't have issues with counter balance shafts lowering the rpms.
Logged
Dan

2009 SERG Orange / Black
Board Track Racer Project, Ultima 113"/6spd
2021 Coleman UT400 Side By Side

grc

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14216
  • AKA Grouchy Old Fart
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2005 SEEG2
Re: Balanced 110
« Reply #7 on: August 23, 2014, 10:43:03 AM »

My first direct experience with balance shaft engines was a Yamaha 500 twin back in 1974 or 1975, I forget the exact date.  No problems, definitely smoother than other rigid mount non-balanced bikes, and no rpm limitations either.  It's all in how you do it.  They didn't do it the way Harley did it on the Twin Cam B engines.

Jerry
« Last Edit: August 23, 2014, 02:34:05 PM by grc »
Logged
Jerry - 2005 Cherry SEEG  -  Member # 1155

H-D and me  -  a classic love / hate relationship.  Current score:  love 40, hate 50, bewildered 10.

2k

  • My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge, when my information changes, I alter my conclusions
  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7996
  • monter le cheval de fer (French)
    • NC


    • CVO1: 2013 SERK-Dressed in BLUE of course.
    • CVO2: 2002 Supercharged HD F150 512 RWHP
    • CVO3: 1956 BelAir Sports Coupe
Re: Balanced 110
« Reply #8 on: August 23, 2014, 12:55:04 PM »

GM has been using counter balance shafts in all their 90 degree V-6 motors since the mid '80s.  Believe me, without them they shook and vibrated badly.  I'm sure the other manufacturers use similar technology.  Buick had their 231ci, most recently their 3800, and it was a vibrating fool until I believe '85.  GM started with their 305 V-8 cut down to a 6 cylinder at 200ci, and then they up'd it to a 229ci from a V-8 350.  These were not great motors and when Buick had their 231, 3.8, 3800, it became their corporate motor for multiple lines.

They don't have issues with counter balance shafts lowering the rpms.

So Dan,
Why did most auto manufactures' go away from the in-line 6, a far simplier more reliable design.
Logged
Most Honda Goldwing riders will blink when hit in the head  with a ball-peen hammer (sans helmet)

grc

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14216
  • AKA Grouchy Old Fart
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2005 SEEG2
Re: Balanced 110
« Reply #9 on: August 23, 2014, 01:50:49 PM »


Inline six cylinder engines are a packaging problem when you're trying to cram an engine and transaxle mounted transversely into the front end of today's unitized body front wheel drive cars.  It's much easier to stuff it in there if the engine is only three cylinders long and not six.  The fact that it's almost impossible to work on these things without dropping the subframe with the engine and trans attached is just one of the costs involved with "progress".  At least we were nice enough to install platinum plugs and high output ignition systems so you don't have to change plugs often. ;D

There still are some inline six cylinder engines floating around in European cars.

Jerry
Logged
Jerry - 2005 Cherry SEEG  -  Member # 1155

H-D and me  -  a classic love / hate relationship.  Current score:  love 40, hate 50, bewildered 10.

dlaws01

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1502
  • Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulltion

    • CVO1: 105th Anniversary FXSTSSE2
Re: Balanced 110
« Reply #10 on: August 23, 2014, 10:09:42 PM »

Actually the counterbalanced "B" version and the hydraulic clutch were BIG factors in my decision to purchase my 08 springer. 
Logged
Jesus is Lord

Dan_Lockwood

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2498
Re: Balanced 110
« Reply #11 on: August 23, 2014, 11:01:18 PM »

So Dan,
Why did most auto manufactures' go away from the in-line 6, a far simplier more reliable design.

What Jerry said.

They were narrow enough, but in cars the V format was a better way to go.  The problem with a 90 degree V-6 is that it cannot be balanced correctly like the HD V-twin in a 45 degree configuration.  Inlines in any multiples can be balanced quite easily.

Now if on a V-6 they did offset rod journals, you "could" balance a motor, but the crank would get very long and be less reliable.
Logged
Dan

2009 SERG Orange / Black
Board Track Racer Project, Ultima 113"/6spd
2021 Coleman UT400 Side By Side

Mount'nman

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 480

    • CVO1: FLSTSE2 (Sold)
    • CVO2: FXSBSE (2014)
    • Family Web Site
Re: Balanced 110
« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2014, 12:14:48 AM »

Actually the counterbalanced "B" version and the hydraulic clutch were BIG factors in my decision to purchase my 08 springer.

X2  Key words "Counter Balanced"  Much different than balanced shaft.
Logged
Bike... and family protected by Ruger

Dr.D

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1109

    • CVO1: 09 SEDFB Sunrise Yellow and Black Quartz
    • CVO2: 2014 CVO Limited silver/orange
    • CVO3: 2015 Indian Vintage Custom 57 Chevy Blue
Re: Balanced 110
« Reply #13 on: August 25, 2014, 10:44:43 AM »

The B motor may be smooth at idle but I always thought my wires Deluxe had much more of a "buzz" in the floorboards and grips at cruising speeds. I'd rather have my shake at the stoplight and not all day on the road.
Logged

2 ROSE

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 702
    • PA


    • CVO1: 2012 CVO Convertible aka “Rose”...my one and only.
Re: Balanced 110
« Reply #14 on: August 25, 2014, 11:27:17 AM »

Hey Dr.D,
My 110B is always smooth wether idling our cruising.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All
 

Page created in 0.227 seconds with 21 queries.