Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2  All

Author Topic: Twin cooled vs. Air cooled 110"  (Read 11819 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

3mcam

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 99
    • SC


    • CVO1: 2021 FLHTKSE Bronze Armor
Twin cooled vs. Air cooled 110"
« on: August 27, 2014, 04:12:33 PM »

Has anyone completed a basic heat comparison? I really like the New 2015 Street Glides. Has the Moco upgraded the 110" since 2010? I would hate to spend 36k just for Twin Cooled heads
if there is no significant heat reduction. Any body have any numbers?
Logged

Royalroadie

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 499
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • KS

Re: Twin cooled vs. Air cooled 110"
« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2014, 11:02:57 PM »

I saw that they started to call them twin cooled, myself, but have on idea what they are trying to say!
Logged
V&H Power Dual Header
Rinehart 4"

FLHTCUSE7

  • Guest
Re: Twin cooled vs. Air cooled 110"
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2014, 11:05:57 PM »

No heat issues with mine
Logged

Steve Cole

  • Manufacturer TTS
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1430
Re: Twin cooled vs. Air cooled 110"
« Reply #3 on: August 28, 2014, 11:12:53 AM »

Has anyone completed a basic heat comparison? I really like the New 2015 Street Glides. Has the Moco upgraded the 110" since 2010? I would hate to spend 36k just for Twin Cooled heads
if there is no significant heat reduction. Any body have any numbers?

Heat reduction, yes, "significant" no. The Twin cooled of shower head as we call it cools the cylinder head area but it does nothing for exhaust temperatures and most of the heat riders feel is the rear cylinder exhaust pipe in slow speed areas (traffic).
Logged
The Best you know, is the Best you've had........ not necessarily the Best.

Boatman

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4816
  • FLHRSEI.ORG

    • CVO1: 2014 CVO Limited
    • CVO2: 2010 SEUC-accident victim-gone
    • CVO3: 2005 SEEG-traded on 2010
Re: Twin cooled vs. Air cooled 110"
« Reply #4 on: August 28, 2014, 12:33:13 PM »

Like everyone has stated, felt heat on the right leg is less but you are still sitting on a engine.

I have a Fullsac headpipe, Fullsac TTS map, and stock mufflers/baffles on the 14 and felt heat is less than my 2010 with the same mod's.. 

This bike runs way better than my 10 (even with Andrew's 54's)..  No more engine mod's on the 14 needed for me.  The 14's also have increased compression and a new ecm..

Regarding 110 upgrades, in 2013 they went with SE lifters and full needle bearings for inner cam bearings.
Logged

LilysBigDaddy

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 131
  • Annabelle
    • NC


    • CVO1: 2014 FLHTKSE CVO Limited "Annabelle"
    • CVO2: 2008 FXDSE2 Dyna 105th Anniversary "The Beast" 129 HP / 129 Torque
Re: Twin cooled vs. Air cooled 110"
« Reply #5 on: August 28, 2014, 01:54:05 PM »

Have not heard any numbers but I would think Harley would proudly boast any significant drop in degrees they would have obtained, I will say mine seems to operate often (fan) on upper 80's+ days and you can really feel a good flow of heat coming out of the leg fairing vents as your riding, so thermodynamically speaking, heat removed is heat removed. I hope that this will prove to mean better reliability even though it was all about performance, good to know about the inner bearings, had that failure on my 06 SG at 65k about 2 years ago, the rear inner, and that was the replacement answer then. Maybe off thread here, but wondering, what is the gain on the SE lifters compared to the previous?
Logged
May you have a Great and Godly Day!

Boatman

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4816
  • FLHRSEI.ORG

    • CVO1: 2014 CVO Limited
    • CVO2: 2010 SEUC-accident victim-gone
    • CVO3: 2005 SEEG-traded on 2010
Re: Twin cooled vs. Air cooled 110"
« Reply #6 on: August 28, 2014, 01:58:36 PM »

Maybe off thread here, but wondering, what is the gain on the SE lifters compared to the previous?

We 13 and later owners will find out for sure.  The surface area of the needle bearings is larger at the roller.
Logged

3mcam

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 99
    • SC


    • CVO1: 2021 FLHTKSE Bronze Armor
Re: Twin cooled vs. Air cooled 110"
« Reply #7 on: August 28, 2014, 02:17:04 PM »

Thanks for the info. Nice to hear that the MOCO has done some upgrades to the engine. Has anyone with the wet heads been stuck in traffic for an extended time. If so how did the system perform?
Logged

Royalroadie

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 499
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • KS

Re: Twin cooled vs. Air cooled 110"
« Reply #8 on: August 28, 2014, 02:52:11 PM »

I will say mine seems to operate often (fan) on upper 80's+ days and you can really feel a good flow of heat coming out of the leg fairing vents as your riding, so thermodynamically speaking, heat removed is heat removed.

Are you saying that H-D put a cooling fan on the motor?  If so where is it located.   I am aware of their parade fan.  This twin cooled term is new to me.   
Logged
V&H Power Dual Header
Rinehart 4"

grc

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14216
  • AKA Grouchy Old Fart
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2005 SEEG2
Re: Twin cooled vs. Air cooled 110"
« Reply #9 on: August 28, 2014, 03:04:39 PM »

Are you saying that H-D put a cooling fan on the motor?  If so where is it located.   I am aware of their parade fan.  This twin cooled term is new to me.

Twin Cooled is how Harley describes their water cooled head system.  And the fan LilysBigDaddy mentioned is the radiator fan.  The radiator and coolant overflow bottle are located in the fairing lowers on select Touring models.

Jerry
Logged
Jerry - 2005 Cherry SEEG  -  Member # 1155

H-D and me  -  a classic love / hate relationship.  Current score:  love 40, hate 50, bewildered 10.

CVO Aqua-Glider

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 410
  • 2014 FLHTKSE

    • CVO1: 2014 CVO Ultra Limited
Re: Twin cooled vs. Air cooled 110"
« Reply #10 on: August 28, 2014, 07:21:20 PM »

My 2014 110" feels noticeably cooler to me than my old 2011 103" felt.  Twin cooled is definitely cooler for the passenger too according to my Wife.
Logged

Untitled by oneboltzfan, on Flickr
2014 FLHTKSE Jupiter Blue/Wicked Sapphire

FLSTFI Dave

  • IBA 69147
  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6949

    • CVO1: 2023 FLTRXSE Whiskey Neat
    • CVO2: 2021 RA1250S Pan America Special
    • CVO3: 2003 Fatboy, 95"quot, S&ampS 570 gear drive cam
Re: Twin cooled vs. Air cooled 110"
« Reply #11 on: August 28, 2014, 08:19:18 PM »

Like everyone has stated, felt heat on the right leg is less but you are still sitting on a engine.

I have a Fullsac headpipe, Fullsac TTS map, and stock mufflers/baffles on the 14 and felt heat is less than my 2010 with the same mod's.. 

This bike runs way better than my 10 (even with Andrew's 54's)..  No more engine mod's on the 14 needed for me.  The 14's also have increased compression and a new ecm..

Regarding 110 upgrades, in 2013 they went with SE lifters and full needle bearings for inner cam bearings.

Are you sure on the new cam in the Twin Cooled motors?  I have been told the cam is still the 255.  In fact I talked to a very reputable tuner about the 2015 CVO Road Glide Utra I am getting, and asked about cams, his word were why change the 255 that is in that bike, it makes great low torque just what ultras need.  He has tuned and built a lot of 2014 110 motors.

I would really like to know the true answer on that, still a 255 in the wet bikes?
Logged
2023 FLTRXSE Whiskey Neat
2021 RA1250S Pan America Special
2019 FLTRXSE Red Pepper / Magnetic Gray Traded
2018 FLTRXSE Gunship Gray  Traded
2017 FLHXSE  Starfire Black / Atomic Red  Traded
2015 FLTRUSE Abyss Blue / Crushed Saphire Traded
2013 FLHRSE5 Diamond Dust 117  Traded
2012 FLTRXSE White Gold Pearl / Starfire Black  Traded
2009 FLTRSE3 Silver/Titanium  Traded
2003 Fatboy, real fire paint set,

Boatman

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4816
  • FLHRSEI.ORG

    • CVO1: 2014 CVO Limited
    • CVO2: 2010 SEUC-accident victim-gone
    • CVO3: 2005 SEEG-traded on 2010
Re: Twin cooled vs. Air cooled 110"
« Reply #12 on: August 28, 2014, 08:23:48 PM »

Yes, wetheads still have the 255 (same as my 10, I put the 54's in the 10)..  Will keep 255's in the 14..
Logged

Royalroadie

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 499
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • KS

Re: Twin cooled vs. Air cooled 110"
« Reply #13 on: August 28, 2014, 08:40:59 PM »

Oh. I finally get it!  The new CVO touring models are wet heads!  At least the cvo street glide and the road glide according to their website comparison charts.  They sure have not brought to anyone's attention.   Maybe the do not want to acknowledge the fact that the cvo runs hotter than Hell.
Logged
V&H Power Dual Header
Rinehart 4"

grc

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14216
  • AKA Grouchy Old Fart
    • IN


    • CVO1: 2005 SEEG2
Re: Twin cooled vs. Air cooled 110"
« Reply #14 on: August 28, 2014, 09:10:49 PM »

Are you sure on the new cam in the Twin Cooled motors?  I have been told the cam is still the 255.  In fact I talked to a very reputable tuner about the 2015 CVO Road Glide Utra I am getting, and asked about cams, his word were why change the 255 that is in that bike, it makes great low torque just what ultras need.  He has tuned and built a lot of 2014 110 motors.

I would really like to know the true answer on that, still a 255 in the wet bikes?

ALL CVO110 engines have the 255 cams, regardless of wet or dry heads.  I think the confusion comes from the changes Harley mentioned last year on the non-CVO wet heads.  Those have a different cam profile and higher compression than their dry counterparts.

Jerry
Logged
Jerry - 2005 Cherry SEEG  -  Member # 1155

H-D and me  -  a classic love / hate relationship.  Current score:  love 40, hate 50, bewildered 10.
Pages: [1] 2  All
 

Page created in 0.24 seconds with 25 queries.