Jerry, thanks.
Hydraulics do NOT compress so it's a 1:1 ratio, master to slave. Better put would be to say that 1 oz. displacement from the master cylinder will provide 1 oz. of fluid input to the slave cylinder. I realize that the master slave are different bores and require different stroke length to provide proper function to disengage the clutch fully and release it without any slippage.
The only way in my mind to use a "short reach" lever would be to have an over bored master cylinder that puts out say 20% more fluid for the same amount of stroke, or in this case, puts out the same amount of fluid for 20% less stroke on the lever.
After thinking about the OP and the problem with reach and the comment about bike week etc, I wonder if it's reach or effort that's the biggest problem.
I know I have no issue reaching my clutch lever, but because I don't ride enough to keep my left hand strong enough, or I could blame it on getting older, fatigue in my fingers happens quite quickly in stop and go traffic. In this case a lighter pull clutch would benefit me, but a short reach lever would do nothing for my fatigue.
"IF" I had a short reach lever and a larger bore master cylinder, I would see an increased amount of force necessary to get the same amount of fluid to the slave cylinder. If it were a 20% reduced reach, read "travel", I would see about a 20% increase in lever pressure and my poor little "old" fingers would be sore very quickly. Of course the percentages are just my wild guess, but they seem right to me.