www.CVOHARLEY.com

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: Putting The 110 Valve Train on a Diet  (Read 1931 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

HD Street Performance

  • Vendor
  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3133
Putting The 110 Valve Train on a Diet
« on: January 10, 2015, 12:07:33 PM »
These valves will be going in my 110 as a test with the stock cam and our premium lifters.

Intake 2.1" 102G VS the 2.08 stocker 113G
Exhaust 1.625 85G VS the 1.623 stock valve 93G

Springs
AV&V Beehives 116G VS Stock Dual Spring 163G

Goal is reduced valve train noise and longer lifter life.
Logged

fastfreddy

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1654
  • MY CVO
    • IA

    • CVO1: 2013 FLTRXSE traded
    • CVO2: 2016 FLTRUSE
Re: Putting The 110 Valve Train on a Diet
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2015, 01:53:23 PM »
your gona like it  :2vrolijk_21:
Logged
SERGU aka the RENTAL ... never home & always broke...Thnx FF

*58Vette

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 285
    • VA


    • CVO1: 2011 FLHXSE2 Black Diamond w/Crimson Tag Graphics
Re: Putting The 110 Valve Train on a Diet
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2015, 07:36:51 PM »
 :)
Logged

Ridgerunr

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 921
  • www.CVOHARLEY.com
    • TN

Re: Putting The 110 Valve Train on a Diet
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2015, 08:47:28 AM »
Don, are the valves proprietary?
Logged
2004 Roadglide 113" (sold)
2014 CVO RoadKing
2015 RGS

RonandJanet

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1207
Re: Putting The 110 Valve Train on a Diet
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2015, 09:03:20 AM »
Any idea when you will be bale to see if there is a noise difference?
Logged

HD Street Performance

  • Vendor
  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3133
Re: Putting The 110 Valve Train on a Diet
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2015, 10:20:32 AM »
The valves are customs with 7mm stems. I won't get around to the install until summer, I am very busy with work.
Logged

diverman

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 31
    • ON


    • CVO1: 12 FLHXSE3
Re: Putting The 110 Valve Train on a Diet
« Reply #6 on: January 12, 2015, 07:49:21 AM »
Quote from: HD Street Performance on January 10, 2015, 12:07:33 PM
These valves will be going in my 110 as a test with the stock cam and our premium lifters.

Intake 2.1" 102G VS the 2.08 stocker 113G
Exhaust 1.625 85G VS the 1.623 stock valve 93G

Springs
AV&V Beehives 116G VS Stock Dual Spring 163G

Goal is reduced valve train noise and longer lifter life.
i also changed the intake 2.1 exhaust 1.65 ,beehive springs, bronze guides, from patrick/av@v but used s@s premium lifters, s@s quickee adjustables  , and fueling reaper 574 cam , very quiet valvetrain, with an awesome idle.
Logged

HD Street Performance

  • Vendor
  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3133
Re: Putting The 110 Valve Train on a Diet
« Reply #7 on: January 12, 2015, 08:05:12 AM »
These valves are much lighter by virtue of 7mm stems and nailhead design. Not putting down what you did. The tuliped valves are heavier than stock.
Logged
 

Page created in 0.24 seconds with 26 queries.