Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2 3  All

Author Topic: Andrews 37G or Zippers 575  (Read 13018 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

103_RK

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 238
Andrews 37G or Zippers 575
« on: April 07, 2007, 06:06:20 AM »

I have a 2003 103" SE Road King.  I ride 2 up a lot and was wondering which gear drive setup would offer the best low end torque.  I know they are both recomended as good cams.  I would like the torque to improve at the 1800 to 3000 rpm range where most riding is done.  Of course I like high numbers like everyone else.  I have Vance & Hines Big SHot Duals with thunder monster baffles.  I have ordered Daytone Twin tec's Twin scan 2 plus to use O2 sensors to adjust the afr with my race tuner.  I asked Andres which cam to use and they eccommended the 37G.  I see here that the ZIppers seems to be the cam of choice.  Any thoughts as to which would offer the torque to meet my needs?

Thanks in advance, this forum is a great source of information.
Logged
103 RK
2003 FLHRSEI2

nidan

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1416
  • Keep the breeze between your knees

    • CVO1: 02 FWDWG3 Stage IV 95 -sold
Re: Andrews 37G or Zippers 575
« Reply #1 on: April 07, 2007, 07:56:39 AM »


The 37G is a much lower lift cam .510 vs .575 for the zippers.  I have a hi comp version of it (31G) and it is a good low end cam that produces a fat flat torque curve from 2000-6000 rpm.

the 37G  does have a lower compression limit , stay under 9.8 and you'll be fine .  The 575 will provide more power , and both benefit from head work .  If you have the bandwidth The Zippers kit would be a good way to go as you get headwork/cams / larger throttlebody .  A proven and matched set .
Logged
CVO -'02 FWDWG3 Stage IV 95 -sold
'07 FLHX Stage II 103 95hp/111lbs ft
'09 FJR 1300- 145hp /99 lbs ft
2011 Mustang GT 412hp/390 lbs ft

DCFIREMANN

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4812
Re: Andrews 37G or Zippers 575
« Reply #2 on: April 07, 2007, 08:19:51 AM »

For a 103 you are better off with the 575's. They are designed for your low compression 103 motor. The valve timing has been changed to make your motor act like it has a higher compression ratio.

Be Safe

THE DAWG
Logged
cvo 1  04 FLHTCSEI  Qrange/Black AKA Ole Punkin
cvo 2 05 VRSCXe Orange/Black sold
cvo 3 02 FXDWG2 Black/Gold 
cvo 4 04 FLHTCSE Blue/Black  sold
cvo 5 09 FLHTCUSE4 Red/Marron sold
cvo 6 12 FLHTCUSE Blue Saphire/Stardust Silver AKA Saphire
cvo 7 14 FLHTKSE  Blaze/Maroon
2020 CVO Limited

PROUD MEMBER EBCM #1.75 Second in command of this great organization

Also has been placed on
TRIPLE SECRET PROBATION

Fired00d

  • Global Moderator
  • 25K CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 32641
  • Orange & Black SEEG... Can it get any better?
    • VA


    • CVO1: FLHTCSE
Re: Andrews 37G or Zippers 575
« Reply #3 on: April 07, 2007, 08:41:37 AM »

The 37G is a much lower lift cam .510 vs .575 for the zippers.  I have a hi comp version of it (31G) and it is a good low end cam that produces a fat flat torque curve from 2000-6000 rpm.

the 37G  does have a lower compression limit , stay under 9.8 and you'll be fine .  The 575 will provide more power , and both benefit from head work .  If you have the bandwidth The Zippers kit would be a good way to go as you get headwork/cams / larger throttlebody .  A proven and matched set . 
Can't speak for the Andrews because I know nothing about them, however I do have the Zippers 575's and I am very pleased w/them.

Along w/Zippers there is another company (Freedom Cycles) that is offering a bolt in cam for the CVO 103ci motors (see below)


REDSHIFT 575 CAMS & OTHER PRETTY PARTS (dyno runs included in this thread).


Freedom Cycles / Yuill Bros. Cam Specs.


FCC14 Cams 103 Dyno.

Neither one of these cam packages require headwork or changing the throttle body as they were designed to be bolt in packages. I know Zippers is not recommending doing any headwork w/their cams as it will defeat the purpose of the way they designed the cams. Some that have gone w/these packages have upgraded the oil pumps (Feuling) while doing this for better oil pressure, changed lifters, and changed pushrods. 

 :pumpkin:
Ride Safe,
Fired00d
 :fireman:
« Last Edit: April 07, 2007, 11:35:43 AM by Fired00d »
Logged
:pumpkin: 2004 Screamin’ Eagle Electra Glide :pumpkin:
Rinehart True Duals
SE Breather
SE Race Tuner
HogTunes Speakers
Zippers 575 Gear Drive Cams
Zippers Pro-Tapered Adjustable Push Rods
Zippers Oil Pressure Bypass Shim
Feuling Oil Pump
Feuling Lifters
Zumo 550 W/Flame Caps
Lyndall Z+ Brake Pads
CVOHarley Member #1234
PGR Member #754 (Since '05)
Proud Member EBCM #2.0

hd-dude

  • Global Moderator
  • 5k CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6646
  • 2005 Cherry FLHTCSE2 "Obsession"

    • CVO1: 05 FLHTCSE2
    • Metal Dragon
Re: Andrews 37G or Zippers 575
« Reply #4 on: April 07, 2007, 11:48:35 AM »

Zippers 575 or the Freedom Cycles YB13 or YB 14. These cams were designed specifically for the 103 motors. The 37G is a good cam for a 88 or 95" motor.

103_RK

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 238
Re: Andrews 37G or Zippers 575
« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2007, 04:36:05 AM »

Thanks to all for the replies.  It looks like Zippers is the way to go.  I do plan on changing the oil pump as well.  Is ther much bebefit in changing the cam plate?  I see Feuling makes a cam plate as well.
Logged
103 RK
2003 FLHRSEI2

Twolanerider

  • 25K CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50549
  • EBCM #1.5 Emeritus DSP # ? Critter Gawker #?
    • MO


    • CVO1: 2000 Triple Red Screamin' Eagle Road Glide
    • CVO2: 2002 Candy Brandywine Screamin' Eagle Road King
    • CVO3: 1999 Arresting Red FXR2
Re: Andrews 37G or Zippers 575
« Reply #6 on: April 08, 2007, 04:52:48 AM »

Thanks to all for the replies.  It looks like Zippers is the way to go.  I do plan on changing the oil pump as well.  Is ther much bebefit in changing the cam plate?  I see Feuling makes a cam plate as well.


Their cam plate is to be used only with their oil pump.  So it's not a universal replacement. 

Cam plate isn't a must do.  The stock part is actually pretty good.  Benefits from the Feuling plate are passage of a bit more volume and apparently the loss of a little cavitation through the galleys.
Logged

103_RK

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 238
Re: Andrews 37G or Zippers 575
« Reply #7 on: April 08, 2007, 10:06:29 PM »

Is the plate worth the $300+ cost?
Logged
103 RK
2003 FLHRSEI2

Twolanerider

  • 25K CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 50549
  • EBCM #1.5 Emeritus DSP # ? Critter Gawker #?
    • MO


    • CVO1: 2000 Triple Red Screamin' Eagle Road Glide
    • CVO2: 2002 Candy Brandywine Screamin' Eagle Road King
    • CVO3: 1999 Arresting Red FXR2
Re: Andrews 37G or Zippers 575
« Reply #8 on: April 09, 2007, 11:11:33 AM »

Is the plate worth the $300+ cost?

The stock piece is good enough I'd not have paid the cost for the Feuling cam plate.  Only reason I got one is I found a great deal on eBay because someone couldn't spell Feuling and no one else apparently found the ad.
Logged

103_RK

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 238
Re: Andrews 37G or Zippers 575
« Reply #9 on: April 09, 2007, 08:42:07 PM »

Lucky find.  I look on ebay often.  Find many good deals when compared to local prices.  I will have to keep an eye out for parts.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2007, 06:27:58 AM by 103_RK »
Logged
103 RK
2003 FLHRSEI2

copout221

  • Still Shopping !
  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 454

    • CVO1: 2007 FLHTCUSE2
    • CVO2: 2010 FLHTCUSE5
    • Taillight Solutions
Re: Andrews 37G or Zippers 575
« Reply #10 on: April 14, 2007, 01:11:51 AM »

 I would also 86 the DTT twins scan stuff...A total P I T A to work with when compared to the Zippers TMAT. Just my .02  :2vrolijk_21:
Logged

St.Pete

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23
  • FLHRSEI.ORG

    • CVO1: FLHRSEI2
Re: Andrews 37G or Zippers 575
« Reply #11 on: April 16, 2007, 04:05:59 AM »

103 RK
In case you havn't started yet.  I just had a Woods 6G installed.  That is the same lift as the andrews 37G.  I wouldn't argue that you will get more torque out of the 575's but I think you will need hi-lift springs for the 575's that you won't need for the 510.  A fair amount more work involved.  I am not unhappy with mine although I wish I had I had had a D&D Fat Cat put on when I did the cam.  I'm running Vance and Hines slash cut muffleres with all the fiber glass removed.  I ended up at 94 HP and 110 Lbs torque.  The torque curve was a vertical line up to 90 lbs then flattened out a bit up to 110.  I guess the real question is how much HP/TQ is enough.  Good Luck and ride safe.  St. Pete
Logged

103_RK

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 238
Re: Andrews 37G or Zippers 575
« Reply #12 on: April 16, 2007, 06:44:36 AM »

St.Pete, I thought the Zippers 575 was meant to be a bolt on without any other modifications to heads of springs?
Logged
103 RK
2003 FLHRSEI2

110tHunDer

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14319
Re: Andrews 37G or Zippers 575
« Reply #13 on: April 16, 2007, 07:57:34 AM »

 
They are.   Along with the YB14 cams from Freedom Cycles in Reno, the 575s are designed to get the most out of the stock 103's hemi heads and require NO OTHER internal mods.

Good luck with your choice.  I know which one I'd do (again). :2vrolijk_21:

Logged

St.Pete

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23
  • FLHRSEI.ORG

    • CVO1: FLHRSEI2
Re: Andrews 37G or Zippers 575
« Reply #14 on: April 16, 2007, 01:06:41 PM »

103 RK
I guess I've been corrected.  The reason I responded is Woods makes a 575 and it requires Hi-Lift springs.  Maybe it is a close call and they ere on the conservative?  St. Pete
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  All
 

Page created in 0.167 seconds with 21 queries.