Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Fullsac Performance]

Steve----do you have a dyno readout from a bike with the Woods 555's??

I do! Here's a Bone Stock 2011 CVO Ultra VS Fullsac Stage II X Pipe Woods 555. Same bike, same tank of gas done 1 day apart.

SG

[mjb765]

So close you may not feel the difference between all 3!!

[willyB]

I do! Here's a Bone Stock 2011 CVO Ultra VS Fullsac Stage II X Pipe Woods 555. Same bike, same tank of gas done 1 day apart.

SG

Those are some great TQ numbers for a bagger. That cam looks like a great choice.

[digga25]

Ernie, I also replaced the stock 255 cams with the feuling 574's and noticed a slight loss in the bottom but strong all the way up from there. Replaced the lifters, pushrods,cam bearings,camplate,oil pump. Now the tic tic is gone. Have you seen the same results with yours. i have a 09 serg.

[JCZ]

Here's a link to the Fueling 574 cams.   The first dyno sheet is my bike, stock head pipe (cat removed), stock air cleaner, Fueling 574 cams, adjustable pushrods (the heads had never been off the bike at this point) and dyno tuned.  Breaks 100 ft. lbs. torque at 2600 rpms.

I think it's pretty safe to say that the larger majority of 110 owners have the Fueling 574 cams.....no survey, just my speculation.

http://www.cvoharley.com/smf/index.php?topic=44545.0 

[SBB]

Here is my dyno.  Fullsac X pipe with 2" baffles with the Feuling 574's for comparison since the difference in configuration is only the cams.

Ernie

Before the 574's were available Jim recommended to me the TW7H for my 2009 SEUC.
After great success with those I did (Jim did the work) the same thing in the 2011.5.
For a heavy bike like the SEUC the extra 9 ft lbs that the TW7H gives me over the 574's is a welcome addition.
But for the record, Jim (hd-dude) is the man regardless of either cam he picks.

 

SBB

[LC110]

All the cams mentioned by others are all very good cams.
Anyone of them will give you more of what you want.
I think you should also take in consideration the Cycle Rama 575 cams.
Outstanding TQ. Quiet running, bolt in w/stock push rods.
http://www.cvoharley.com/smf/index.php?topic=41805.0

[1sharprdkg]

I like that paint scheme.
Makes me think about a new bike......
Scott

Yeah, it looks even better in person.

[CVO2FIXUP]

  So with cams, lets say the Andrews 54 and the adjustable push rods, from all your experience what happens to the valve train noise? Does it get better? Quieter?

[strokerjlk]

   Looking to install a set of cams on my 2010 110 Ultra. More power is a given but don't want to loose any bottom end. Just want to gain everywhere. I rarely spit it up close to red line. Love to short shift and gt on it hard to feel the pull. Any suggestions would be great.

sounds like if you maximized what you already have, you could have what your looking for.
short shifting, and below 4000 rpms tq.
if your running a stock tune,or a canned map,you could gain 15/15 with a proper tune.
picking up 15 tq before 4000 rpms is something you will notice.
If you truly never mix it up, in the upper rpms? Then basing your decison on a dyno sheet run @ WOT dosent really tell you what you will gain at partial throttle operation....where you will spend your time. Hard to beat the 255 cams for your riding style.
that said if you have to swap cams. The C/R 575 or fueling 574 work nice.