Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[HILLSIDECYCLE.COM]

I'll post mine up for you. This was just a bolt in cam tuned with a Powervison tuner. You can see in my sig. what all I had.

Now, it you upped the compression(if looking for more) to 9.8, 9.9, it would change that substancially.
Dyno chart looks good.
Scott

[Mr D]

The 2015 103 has plenty of power. Personally I would just give a good exhaust, high flow breather, and ride it.

Economically, I agree... I 'bolted" in a CR 575 in my '14 TK , picked up 11/3 over the stock grind with a stage 1, She runs flawless, great power.. But to really maker her shine, needs a port job on the heads.

[georgw221]

Economically, I agree... I 'bolted" in a CR 575 in my '14 TK , picked up 11/3 over the stock grind with a stage 1, She runs flawless, great power.. But to really maker her shine, needs a port job on the heads.

Do you have a Dyno sheet you can post showing all the Mods ?

[Mr D]

Do you have a Dyno sheet you can post showing all the Mods ?

I'll try & post tomorrow

[Tn.Heritage]

Now, it you upped the compression(if looking for more) to 9.8, 9.9, it would change that substancially.
Dyno chart looks good.
Scott

Scott correct me if I'm wrong but the Wetheads supposed to have 10.1 I believe, that's why I chose this cam, otherwise it would have probably been a Woods 222. I'll have to say though that I love the 57 cam's and the way they pull down low and the mid range is awesome. We actually installed the 2015 calibrations and retuned and it gave me 10 more ft lbs. down low and brought it up to 100 ft. lbs. of tq about 150 rpm's earlier but I didn't print the chart.

[HILLSIDECYCLE.COM]

Scott correct me if I'm wrong but the Wetheads supposed to have 10.1 I believe, that's why I chose this cam, otherwise it would have probably been a Woods 222. I'll have to say though that I love the 57 cam's and the way they pull down low and the mid range is awesome. We actually installed the 2015 calibrations and retuned and it gave me 10 more ft lbs. down low and brought it up to 100 ft. lbs. of tq about 150 rpm's earlier but I didn't print the chart.

That engine does carry that squeeze..........missed that.
Scott

[Mr D]

Do you have a Dyno sheet you can post showing all the Mods ?

*** Display Did'nt Come Through in Letter Format ***

[Jswerve]

 

[Mr D]

Thank You 

[Jswerve]

Thank You 

You bet! I am getting old can't do the squinting lol

[Fullsac Performance]

I'm still a fan of the 54 Andrews for many mild builds. This a 2014 air cooled 103. 54 Andrews, stock pushrods, DX Pipe, 2.0 core in the stock mufflers. S+S AC. I did pull the heads and go with a .030 head gasket only to find that the 2014 103 has .040 gaskets in em stock. I don't think .010 was worth pulling the heads. Next one I would just bolt it in and go.

Hard to complain with a TQ curve like this. Peak numbers were good too!

Steve@fullsac.com