Good luck Dawg. In comment to your not trusting these new bikes:
Discussing the rumored '16 Road Glide Ultra vs. the CVO RG this weekend and one of "my crew" of riding buddies absolutely refuses to even consider a CVO because of all the problems EVERYONE we know whose bought one has had. Like breakdown stranded on a trip problems. And many of them are repeated. As in not fixed or the fixed part breaks like the original. I'm sure many have bought trouble free CVOs. But the people we know personally who own them have ALL had major issues. 5 owners, 4 of which are owners of new (2014 - 2015) models.
I've all but decided to never buy another CVO myself.
I have an '08 CUSE3. Its been reliable but still has had major engine work (cams, lifter, etc at 40k) repairs, the major recall for leakage issues that we experienced back then, 4 radios (about to be 5), throttle issue, and of course the compensator. Now with almost 90k on it, which is more likely to make it across the country when my kid gets stationed out west? A 10 year old 100k bike or a brand new bike from a QC department run by squirrels who couldn't find a nut in a planters peanut factory.

Fugly or not... You have to start thinking about Polaris as a better company if you care about mechanical design, reliability and Quality Control. The Indian's might not be everyone's cup of tea, but the victory cross roads is not a bad looking bike and I haven't heard much negative about them.
Donny Pederson had an interesting mechanical engineering perspective piece in AIM last month. Can't find much in that article to make me feel good about the MoCo... And he's a Harley guy!
PS. For the Harley sycophants out there... let me save you the reply. Peanuts are a legume. Not a nut. So it may be difficult for a squirrel to find a nut in a peanut factory. Which is exactly the kind of nit picking the Harley sycophants seem to love to do these days while making excuses for a failed product that we all loved at one point in our lives.