The Evo's didn't like high lift. Tore 'em up if they were too high. Your right about the power band. You needed to be at least 3 grand for the cam to start kicking in. I guess there's still a lot for me to get used to about modifying these engines. My previous 2 TC Road Kings were left stock. This thing got me hooked on hot rodding it. Was any headwork needed for that lift or piston clearance issues? Thanks DC. Hoist! 
657TC
INT27/99/45
EX 52/104/26
252/258
.657/.657
.228/.212
Seems like a high lift cam aimed at getting every last drop!
The SE 251 cam I run only has a .579 Lift and we had to Clarence the rocker boxes, add SE springs and beef up the p/rods. The spec-ed ones bent and we had to go with SE adjustable. Jim has had trouble with Andrews CROMO p/rods breaking/bending on AK's bike. I have found that reliability is a factor for a touring ride. This is why I am sticking with the 9.3:1 and the SE 251.
About gear drive cams. There is a lot of info here. There always seems to be issues with Hd engine shafts having too much run out or misalignment issues. Techs claim shafts are in tolerances and the install was perfect, but there are always issues. Sure the chain and tensioner wears but they are a h*ll of a lot more reliable than Gear drives. Gear drives are noisy also, just what we need more noise from a 110 that already sounds like it is comming apart. At .579 lift my inherent valvetrain noise almost doubled. What will .657 sound like?
All of these mods are great if you are using them on a bar bike. On a bike I am running from California to DC these are not good risk management and noisy.
So Hoist, I personally applaud your wait an see attitude and not wanting to wring every drop out of a Touring bike.

Iron