Doesn't seem right to question the resume but I'm still scratching over the decision to nix the Medal of Honor. Story appears worthy 
A few years ago I had a gig that involved gathering some histories on Medals of Honor awards and winners. It had in its early use not always been an award solely about gallantry. Sometimes political motivations were part of the award. After the Civil War the change completed that removed that part of the legacy from award's status.
Strictly guessing here. But the award in its modern sense has always been a known heroic gallantry. Willingly and with understanding putting yourself in a position so far above and beyond the pale of duty that no other award can adequately recognize the effort or (as in most cases) sacrifice.
Somone already mortally wounded would, in those measures, be less likely to receive a Medal of Honor than he would (in this case) a Silver Star. Someone not fully cognizant of their actions would stand in the same review.
It is not that such effort or sacrifice is not gallant or heraldic and heroic. It's just that the CMH stands in a light bright enough that there is a distinction between giving a life to save others out of instinct or when that life is already likely lost as opposed to doing the same knowingly and when that life is full and vibrant.
Whomever had to make that disinction; I'm glad I'm not him. That is not a measure I would wish to make.