Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2  All

Author Topic: TTS Mastertune v SE Pro Super Tune  (Read 4524 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ralford

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 65

    • CVO1: 2010 Ultra Classic
TTS Mastertune v SE Pro Super Tune
« on: August 01, 2011, 01:01:29 PM »

Recently got a '10 SE Ultra Classic with the 110" engine.  Of course, next step is to upgrade the engine to what it should have been from the factory ...  Been learning a lot from the site (Thanks!) and am getting ready to pull the trigger - would like to avoid shooting my foot of :oops:

I suspect the TTS Mastertune and the SEST are closely related.  Have been told (by HD dealer) that the TTS is a previous version of the SE tuner, with the SEST the newer upgrade; probably simply new software is true. 

The TTS appeals a lot because of the available downloadable tunes from several respected sites.  Not as optimum as a proper dyno tune, but certainly in the ball park.  Dyno tunes in Tulsa appear to run between $360-$550 and I can't see do that as a routine process as I add parts...

On the other hand, the HD dealers (respectable tuning here) may or may not be able to tune with the TTS???

Q: Are there downloadable tunes for the SE Super Tuner available?  Can the TTS tunes be used on the SE Supertuner?

Q: How are the two units related, if all?


Thanks!

Rusty
Logged

Keats

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2642
  • Do not be led astray

    • CVO1: 2008 FLHTCUSE3
    • CVO2: 2003 FXSTDSEI
Re: TTS Mastertune v SE Pro Super Tune
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2011, 01:21:16 PM »

In the end,

These tuners are only as good as the personnel setting them up on a Dyno.

I have had little luck in that dept.

There are good tuners around, just not very convenient to me.

I am done letting a HD dealer tune my bike,  Did I say DONE?

might want to look at auto tune options, just a thought
Logged
Formally FLHTCUSE3
SoA #99.9            "Never say Die"
SEST,   open A/C , dyno tuned, D&D Fatcats 2 into 1 ceramic coated, new SE CNC Ported and coated Heads with 2.120 intake valve, SE camplate,
Jims SE Crank "Darkhorsed", Timkin conversion, Andrews 54H cams, Arnott Air shocks, intimidator front valves, HID headlights, LED turn signals, Moto Lights,  Zumo 550, SE compensator.

ralford

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 65

    • CVO1: 2010 Ultra Classic
Re: TTS Mastertune v SE Pro Super Tune
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2011, 01:37:25 PM »

Certainly agree with your observation and understand your feelings.  Both have some sort of "auto-tune" facility, but the limited range of feedback adjustment appears to require a decent MAP to get within adjustment range.

One comment, I keep seeing $30-50 dyno runs.  Now for a "run" I can see that, for a tune much more time must be required unless they just upload a MAP...

Cheers,
Rusty
Logged

Keats

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2642
  • Do not be led astray

    • CVO1: 2008 FLHTCUSE3
    • CVO2: 2003 FXSTDSEI
Re: TTS Mastertune v SE Pro Super Tune
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2011, 01:46:36 PM »

Each tune / dyno run was billed 6 - 8 hours

SERT WITH dyno time cost just under $900.00

SEPST WITH dyno time cost me just over $1000.00

"Dyno runs" for $50.00 has nothing to do with tuning, just a piece of paper that one can brag about to your Buddies.

Those little pieces of paper have never won a race.

and I am convinced that most of those are fudged to give you what you want to hear.




« Last Edit: August 01, 2011, 01:48:39 PM by Keats »
Logged
Formally FLHTCUSE3
SoA #99.9            "Never say Die"
SEST,   open A/C , dyno tuned, D&D Fatcats 2 into 1 ceramic coated, new SE CNC Ported and coated Heads with 2.120 intake valve, SE camplate,
Jims SE Crank "Darkhorsed", Timkin conversion, Andrews 54H cams, Arnott Air shocks, intimidator front valves, HID headlights, LED turn signals, Moto Lights,  Zumo 550, SE compensator.

Steve Cole

  • Manufacturer TTS
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1430
Re: TTS Mastertune v SE Pro Super Tune
« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2011, 05:04:24 PM »

Q: Are there downloadable tunes for the SE Super Tuner available?  Can the TTS tunes be used on the SE Supertuner?

Q: How are the two units related, if all?


Thanks!

Rusty

TTS tunes cannot be used with the SE Supertuner.

TTS supplied HD with our tuner from 2001 - 2007 as the SERT. It was a private label arangement between the companies. In 2007 we found out HD was having our product copied which broke the contract and we walked out. We were then able to put back some of the items we had removed for HD and also added other features that we had want to and customers had been asking for. Anyone who can tune with the SERT or Supertuner can tune with a TTS System.
Logged
The Best you know, is the Best you've had........ not necessarily the Best.

ralford

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 65

    • CVO1: 2010 Ultra Classic
Re: TTS Mastertune v SE Pro Super Tune
« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2011, 07:52:46 PM »

Thanks for the direct answer, Steve.  Seems like there isn't much motivation to use the SERT, understandably, HD favors it...  Somehow I suspect you have more personal reputation invested in the product and the reputation and vast availability of information and base tunes easily tips the balance in the TTS favor...

Cheers,

Rusty
Logged

strokerjlk

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 143
Re: TTS Mastertune v SE Pro Super Tune
« Reply #6 on: August 01, 2011, 09:17:58 PM »

Quote
The TTS appeals a lot because of the available downloadable tunes from several respected sites.  Not as optimum as a proper dyno tune, but certainly in the ball park

Quote
Are there downloadable tunes for the SE Super Tuner available?

both have a canned map for a cvo, neither will be in the ball park. both need tuned to reach optimal performance. you can achieve the the same quality tune with either device. so use the one the tuner is comfortable with.
FWIW just talking WOT hp/tq numbers here a canned SESPT or tts CVO map will usually net 80-82 hp 100-102 tq.
a tuned 110 CVO stage 1  SESPT or tts will net 95/115 no problem.
then there is drivablility, a canned map you can get around on,but tuned will be so much smoother.
Logged


If you point your oxygen-acetylene cutting torch
at a temperature sensor and adjust it for the highest temp you have found stoichiometric
Ron Dickey

beechflyr

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 59

    • CVO1: Flhtcuse6
Re: TTS Mastertune v SE Pro Super Tune
« Reply #7 on: August 01, 2011, 09:47:58 PM »

I'll tell ya, fullsac stage 1 with the canned TTS may not be necessarily
perfect but it seems  to be really close.
Logged

mjb765

  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6809

    • CVO1: 2011 FLHXSE--sold
    • CVO2: 2015 FLHXSE--sold
    • CVO3: 2018 FLTRXSE
Re: TTS Mastertune v SE Pro Super Tune
« Reply #8 on: August 01, 2011, 10:10:14 PM »

both have a canned map for a cvo, neither will be in the ball park. both need tuned to reach optimal performance. you can achieve the the same quality tune with either device. so use the one the tuner is comfortable with.
FWIW just talking WOT hp/tq numbers here a canned SESPT or tts CVO map will usually net 80-82 hp 100-102 tq.
a tuned 110 CVO stage 1  SESPT or tts will net 95/115 no problem.
then there is drivablility, a canned map you can get around on,but tuned will be so much smoother.

On my 2010 SESG, my experience when I purchased my TTS from Fullsac was the opposite.....the map Steve sent me was so close it just about didn't pay for me to have it dyno tuned.
Logged

SBB

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16404
  • Go fast or go home! EBCM member # 2.36 .01%
    • CVO2: 2011.5 SEUC
    • CVO3: 2012 SERG
Re: TTS Mastertune v SE Pro Super Tune
« Reply #9 on: August 01, 2011, 10:15:33 PM »

On my 2010 SESG, my experience when I purchased my TTS from Fullsac was the opposite.....the map Steve sent me was so close it just about didn't pay for me to have it dyno tuned.

How do you know that?
Did you have it tuned to compare?

 :nixweiss: :nixweiss: :nixweiss: :nixweiss:

SBB
Logged

2012      SERG  "Nu Blue"
2018      Goldwing   
2003      HD Electra Glide Classic Silver and Black, of course!                
2 2012   Suzuki Burgmans
2018      Shelby GT350, 963 crank hp, 825 rear wheel hp

mjb765

  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6809

    • CVO1: 2011 FLHXSE--sold
    • CVO2: 2015 FLHXSE--sold
    • CVO3: 2018 FLTRXSE
Re: TTS Mastertune v SE Pro Super Tune
« Reply #10 on: August 01, 2011, 10:20:22 PM »

How do you know that?
Did you have it tuned to compare?

 :nixweiss: :nixweiss: :nixweiss: :nixweiss:

SBB

Had it dyno'ed and it was so close the tuner said he wouldn't even bother spending the extra cash for the last 1%. I don't have the printout anymore(it was 2 years ago), but AFR was nice and flat all the way across and right where it should be. HP and TRQ was good for a bike with only exhaust and a tuner. I remember being surprised and amazed that it was that good without doing any tweaking.
Logged

strokerjlk

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 143
Re: TTS Mastertune v SE Pro Super Tune
« Reply #11 on: August 02, 2011, 04:07:45 PM »

Had it dyno'ed and it was so close the tuner said he wouldn't even bother spending the extra cash for the last 1%. I don't have the printout anymore(it was 2 years ago), but AFR was nice and flat all the way across and right where it should be. HP and TRQ was good for a bike with only exhaust and a tuner. I remember being surprised and amazed that it was that good without doing any tweaking.

so the WOT was close is all that tells you.


anyway I in no way meant my comment against Steve or fullsac. it is possible that a map from a tuned bike will be close enough to run on another bike with the same components.
could it be better?  most times.
my comment was in reference to purchasing a tuning device and loading a canned my from there software.
one with some real work devolopment for a particular combination should be fine . but there COULD be room for improvement
Logged


If you point your oxygen-acetylene cutting torch
at a temperature sensor and adjust it for the highest temp you have found stoichiometric
Ron Dickey

mjb765

  • 5k CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6809

    • CVO1: 2011 FLHXSE--sold
    • CVO2: 2015 FLHXSE--sold
    • CVO3: 2018 FLTRXSE
Re: TTS Mastertune v SE Pro Super Tune
« Reply #12 on: August 02, 2011, 04:35:07 PM »

so the WOT was close is all that tells you.


anyway I in no way meant my comment against Steve or fullsac. it is possible that a map from a tuned bike will be close enough to run on another bike with the same components.
could it be better?  most times.
my comment was in reference to purchasing a tuning device and loading a canned my from there software.
one with some real work devolopment for a particular combination should be fine . but there COULD be room for improvement

room for improvement--yes. Improvement that you would feel in the seat of your pants--I doubt it. You would see it on a dyno printout, but that was not my first priority.
Logged

cvobiker

  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2643
Re: TTS Mastertune v SE Pro Super Tune
« Reply #13 on: August 02, 2011, 11:47:17 PM »

It is interesting enough to note, the new Revolution Performance EMS is hitting the marks dead on compared to $500 dyno tunes.. Not a bias opinion, A simple google search on Revolution Performance EMS reviews is the tale tale here..  :2vrolijk_21:
Logged

strokerjlk

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 143
Re: TTS Mastertune v SE Pro Super Tune
« Reply #14 on: August 03, 2011, 01:36:33 AM »

It is interesting enough to note, the new Revolution Performance EMS is hitting the marks dead on compared to $500 dyno tunes.. Not a bias opinion, A simple google search on Revolution Performance EMS reviews is the tale tale here..  :2vrolijk_21:
thought this was a tts vs SE pro super tuner thread :nixweiss:
ohh well since you brought it up.
it seems about 50/50 from what I see. haven't googled it though. :-\ just feed back from users. I have had three calls from guys wanting to go back to stock ECM and re-flash tune.
the crew at REV Performance are doing a hell of a job trying to rectify the issues some have had. flying in and making changes and such. got to hand it to them there. but when you design a system only you can adj. you have to be able to service that product if it isnt performing. there are a lot of happy users,but there are also some that cant seem to get it right.
hope it works out for them. competition is always a good thing for consumers!.:2vrolijk_21:
Logged


If you point your oxygen-acetylene cutting torch
at a temperature sensor and adjust it for the highest temp you have found stoichiometric
Ron Dickey
Pages: [1] 2  All
 

Page created in 0.251 seconds with 25 queries.