Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13

Author Topic: Tuner for 2012 110 motor  (Read 22775 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Fattbaggernknox

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 162
Re: Tuner for 2012 110 motor
« Reply #150 on: May 20, 2013, 07:55:29 AM »

this has turned into HTT for those members who've been tossed! :soapbox:
Logged
2011 fltruse FBI wheels& hidden axle 574 Fuelling cams & lifters.J&M rocker series speakers & amp, Rb Racing black hole spyder 2-1, Aim-vpc92,SE 58MM TB, HPI 5.3 inj. Tuned by Strokerjlk 112.76/118.99 sae 115.42/121.85 std

sadunbar

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11416
  • EBCM # Stealth - SSBS # 1.1 - SoA # Z&E2525 .01%
    • IL


    • CVO1: 2007 FLHTCUSE2
    • CVO2: 2000 FXR4
Re: Tuner for 2012 110 motor
« Reply #151 on: May 20, 2013, 11:33:20 AM »

this has turned into HTT for those members who've been tossed! :soapbox:

Today's tuner threads are akin to yesterday's oil threads.   :huepfenlol2:  Overly passionate and unwavering, and they all generally end up in the same place.  Dominated by agendas, no truths, half truths and occasional actual facts.   Those seeking true information have to be adept at reading between the lines to learn anything.  No one has changed the others mind, each is convinced they are right and thinks the other guy is both uneducated on the topic and an overall dufus!  Fun to read for awhile, but soon tiresome...   :)
« Last Edit: May 20, 2013, 11:42:52 AM by sadunbar »
Logged
2007 Screamin Eagle Ultra Classic - Light Candy Cherry and Black Ice
Screamin Eagle 120r
Revolution Performance EMS
Fuel Moto Jackpot headpipes and 4.5" Pro Touring Mufflers
HPI 55mm Throttle Body w/5.3 injectors
BDL clutch w/VPC92T
Traxxion AK-20
Legend Air Suspension
Brembo Brake Calipers/Rotors
Garmin Zumo
575 Chubby's
Bushtec Quantum

Heatwave

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1429
  • ‘10 CVO Ultra 120/127 & ‘17 CVO LTD 140/151

    • CVO1: 2017 CVO Limited (Garnet/Red) 128ci
    • CVO2: 2010 SE Ultra (Red/Slate)
Re: Tuner for 2012 110 motor
« Reply #152 on: May 20, 2013, 11:38:01 AM »

this has turned into HTT for those members who've been tossed! :soapbox:

I assume you're referring to someone else as I've never been tossed from any forum.
Logged

lilcoot

  • Elite CVO Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 942
  • Scaramoosh! Scaramoosh! Can you do the Fandango?

    • CVO1: '13 FLTCUSE8
Re: Tuner for 2012 110 motor
« Reply #153 on: May 20, 2013, 12:11:53 PM »

IRISHSE is a trouble maker!   :devil:

Look at all this turmoil he started.   :argue:

I think Neil needs to consider 86ing this rabble rouser.   :smash: :smilie_staub:




IRISHSE, buddy, I'm glad this thread expanded and explained some details.  It's info I'm glad to learn.  I've made some pretty asinine statements here because of lack of knowledge and experience in the past, and threads like this are helpful in making informed decisions in the future.  Your initial post was important because almost every new Harley buyer has similar questions.  Keep up the good work.  :2vrolijk_21:
Logged

Buckeye_Tuning

  • Mister Dick
  • Banned
  • Full CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 198
Re: Tuner for 2012 110 motor
« Reply #154 on: May 20, 2013, 03:35:48 PM »

SteveFLHTK has it correct.  We are NOT taking about the collector, YOU are, and that is NOT whats happening at all..  We are talking about the ACTUAL length of the head pipe inside of the collector.  FORGET what you don't know about cars. No v8 here with cats on the banks.  And yes, I owned a z06 and understand whats going on there.  I played with the tuning on THAT, even.  It's a disease.

This is a v-twin bike with reversion in the exhaust.  One pulse will force fresh air up the other pipe, and THAT makes the sensors read the WRONG amount of oxygen, Sir..  If one wanted to do this correctly?  Once the cat material is removed, weld in two pipes to the existing pipes.  Hell, weld in ONE pipe extension for that matter. The honey comb in the cat material makes the pipes ACT as if it were two distinct pipes.  Removing this makes the length too short by a mile.  The O2s DO crosstalk.  And THAT is why I always state that whatever members think....  does NOT make it right.  I do NOT care if your welder hacked a pipe or not.  It is actually WRONG for a nice smooth riding bike.  Does that welder tune?  Does he know what it takes to make a great tune?  See?

You can listen or not.  I'm just attempting to make you aware of whats really happening.  Welding in some stubbies or buying a different headpipe is the way to go.  If you can live with the heat?  Leave it alone.  NO power to be gained by removing the Cat material.

All of this is NOT all that subjective either.  It is objective.  One can SEE things on a dyno that their butt dyno does NOT see.  Folks fall prey to half truths and complete non truths on these forums.  I ONLY report on what I know to be true, like this head pipe issue.  Too many times do DIY guys end up at a tuning shop because they canNOT get their bike to tune in at low RPMs.  Removed cats are usually the culprit.

Tha'ts true about HTT, but since I can post on HTT, not me.  EVERYONE is passionate about their tuner of choice.  I am, too.  But...  most of the time I do NOT get the luxury of picking the tuner a customer brings with his bike.  I see some differences between them all.  I'm tuning a 117 with 555 cams in a couple weeks with a PV.  NOT thrilled, but will get it done AND be a nice riding bike, to boot.  Steve Cole has shown me that 'lugging' is a TUNING issue. I can ride my personal 120R at 1800 rpms in 6th, all day long.  So S M O O T H, if done right.

If the OP is going to run ANY kind of fueler, tuner, or whatever, and he will have the O2 sensors still working?  Thinking about pipes and pipe lengths matter.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2013, 03:50:19 PM by wurk_truk »
Logged
Never Ever Forget; Never Ever Forgive

Buckeye_Tuning

  • Mister Dick
  • Banned
  • Full CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 198
Re: Tuner for 2012 110 motor
« Reply #155 on: May 20, 2013, 03:53:05 PM »

I'm NOT trying to be a Dick, OP.  I AM trying to make you THINK.  Some of us DO have a bit of experience with things and spend our time, online, fighting untruths and half truths.  I, myself, would NOT do that, unless I gave a chit about the various memberships.  I LOVE folks that ride.  Ya KNow?

And... Knox bagger, what exactly is wrong with folks from HTT?  How much tuning experience do you have?  Who are you on HTT?  Spill it out, because I AM wurk truk on BOTH forums.  There ARE more argumants than the old oil threads.  Some have something invested and some do NOT.  I, myself, and most here, do NOT.  Truth is truth.  I got a moth ban from HTT for explaining the true differences between PV and TTS/SEPST.

I am NOT looking for that kind of crap either.  I LIKE to try to tune.  I wish to hear about TUNING and NOT tuners, myself.  But... one should KNOW the various differences between all of the products from XIEDs to TTS, and ALL in between, right?  Right?
« Last Edit: May 20, 2013, 03:59:42 PM by wurk_truk »
Logged
Never Ever Forget; Never Ever Forgive

hrdtail78

  • Vendor
  • Elite CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 762
Re: Tuner for 2012 110 motor
« Reply #156 on: May 20, 2013, 05:11:11 PM »

I am a current member at HTT as well. I haven't gotten the boot.  I have been a member here for awhile but don't post. I still come here and read though. I actually was scrolling through this forum looking for advice on the premium HD shocks and came across this thread.  My screen name is hrdtail78 over there as well but I don't mind being called Jason.
Logged

redmtrckl

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 96
Re: Tuner for 2012 110 motor
« Reply #157 on: May 20, 2013, 05:18:53 PM »

Another HTT resident lurking over here. Thanks goodness we can come on this site and talk about TTS and the tuning of it and not get banned. IMO HTT mods lost a lot of credibility for being unbiased as mods are supposed to be when they boot certain people for standing up for their product. Not a fair move IMO.
That said I like the fact that I can call the inventor of said wheel and talk to him one on one to get answers and explanations.
Logged

HOGMIKE

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2436
  • 65 FLH 93" + others
Re: Tuner for 2012 110 motor
« Reply #158 on: May 20, 2013, 06:50:24 PM »

I just noticed this post after getting back from a long ride.
Along the ride I just got to thinking how much I LOVE the way my bike was running.

78779 miles on the clock today with the tuner I installed when the bike, then dyno tuned, had about 1000 miles on it.
Never looked back, never changed anything. Done once, done right.
JMHO
Logged
HOGMIKE

Heatwave

  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1429
  • ‘10 CVO Ultra 120/127 & ‘17 CVO LTD 140/151

    • CVO1: 2017 CVO Limited (Garnet/Red) 128ci
    • CVO2: 2010 SE Ultra (Red/Slate)
Re: Tuner for 2012 110 motor
« Reply #159 on: May 20, 2013, 10:42:31 PM »

Question to consider. If the bike could run even better would you want it to? I think for those that are satisfied with the way their bike runs and have no desire to know if it could be even better, then stick with what works. If you have the sickness of always wanting "more", then get a tuner that easily enables improvement. Unless you're convinced that your bike is fully optimized, then there's always room for improvement and finding the best tool for making improvements is why the OP started his thread.

I just noticed this post after getting back from a long ride.
Along the ride I just got to thinking how much I LOVE the way my bike was running.

78779 miles on the clock today with the tuner I installed when the bike, then dyno tuned, had about 1000 miles on it.
Never looked back, never changed anything. Done once, done right.
JMHO

« Last Edit: May 20, 2013, 11:10:46 PM by Heatwave »
Logged

redmtrckl

  • Junior CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 96
Re: Tuner for 2012 110 motor
« Reply #160 on: May 21, 2013, 09:44:34 AM »

Why would one use a parasitic tuning device if one expected to get optimum results and performance? Why not a comprehensive device or system that allows tuning in all or most areas. Any device that attaches itself to the OEM calibration and attempts to "fool" the factory program instead of re-writing the OEM calibration with it's own program cannot and will never be able to make the most optimum results----EVER!

To the OP, the safest bet is to use something like Fullsac has to offer, complete with proven a calibration designed for their product. Something that is not a piggyback device and will allow for more comprehensive changes in the future.
« Last Edit: May 21, 2013, 09:47:10 AM by redmtrckl »
Logged

Buckeye_Tuning

  • Mister Dick
  • Banned
  • Full CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 198
Re: Tuner for 2012 110 motor
« Reply #161 on: May 21, 2013, 10:17:45 AM »

It's been brought to my attention that I WAS being a dick.  OK.  I was....  I have to admit that I feel a PV can get the job done.  I also feel that a PV can end up being easier to use for a bike owner DIY type of guy.  I have also, always have said, that, at the end of the day, if someone wants a bit more, then TTS is the way to go.  These have been my stated opinions for awhile now.

Member Heatwave brought out a bad side in me and I apologize.  Some of what HE says isn't ringing true to me and my own personal experiences from the TTS product.

So...  to the OP, please buy a pipe instead of welding it up.  That really does help and make a difference.  Also, to the OP, you need to make a decision.... what to do about fuel.  Your choices range from installing some kind of XIED product, to a hang on the bike fooler box, like Power Commander, Cobra, V&H fooler, etc, to having an actual flash tuner.  OP, I recommend that you bite the bullet and spend the extra money on a Flash Tuner.  There is more to it than just 'fuel', for a smoother running bike.  PV costs a little more than TTS.  If you buy a Fullsac head pipe you can get the TTS WITH a base map already to go for your set up.  You could ALSO go with Fuelmoto and buy his pipe with a PV that also has a base map that should work.

WIth either system, you can run the base map, or tune the bike a little further.  Not too awful hard to do, actually. I recommend you do so.

What this all is, and all of us have to find out eventually is that THIS is THE HArley Tax.....  We touch ANYTHING on the stock engine, we simply HAVE to address the fuel issues.  No way around that, because the bike, as it sits, simply cannot overcome the calibration that comes with a stock bike.  So... we ALL have done something.  That sucks, but it's the facts of life.

Yes, I like the TTS better.  I AM a fanboi, I guess.  At the end of the day, the TTS will have the better tune.  This IS from experience.  But, I will also say that if you wish some 'hand holding' on this expense, PV has you covered, too.

A point was brought up and also needs discussing...  A complete pro tune is anywhere from like $700 to $1000, and that price WILL include the tuner.  It IS a lot, but you ONLY need mess with it all again if you change anything on the bike later, like cams.  Afterwards, another tune should be like $3-400ish for a new tune when you do do more work.

Do you have any Pro tuners around?  NOT Dealers that tune(except for Gail's in KC... they do good work tuning), but an Indy shop that specializes in tuning?  If so...  go ask THAT GUY what HE likes to tune with.  Follow HIS lead and not ours.  I can think of a tuner in Ohio near upper Sandusky.  Roeder Racing.  What they do is sell a PV tuning license and NOT the PV itself.  They will do a full tune for $500. Also, there are a couple tuners in Mich, I think are quite good, too.  Take the bike to one of those guys, leave the bike for 3-4 days, come back and get the bike, and simply RIDE it.

And... FWIW....  If it were me, back in the day...  I would do a complete Stage 1 with new cams, tune it, and call it a day.  Doing just this will give the bike the power it SHOULD have and it will last a lifetime.  A lifetime of fun and enjoyment and....  no stress like this crap, to you.
« Last Edit: May 21, 2013, 10:38:20 AM by wurk_truk »
Logged
Never Ever Forget; Never Ever Forgive

Fattbaggernknox

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 162
Re: Tuner for 2012 110 motor
« Reply #162 on: May 21, 2013, 10:42:17 AM »

I am fltrse3clone on V-twin & htt.. I don't tune bikes just ride & a lot of miles I do rack up annually. I have no personal agenda or financial gain in the tuning market. I've ran PCV, Sert,TTS & recently went with direct link tuning on my current two HD's. Of the one's listed I found the HTT to be least user friendly (imho) We have no real tuners in my area after Turbo passed & basically have caned map installers.It's no secret that I travel 500 miles one way to get my bikes tuned & am more than pleased with the outcome.For what the op is seeking a PCV with a canned map would do just fine.
Logged
2011 fltruse FBI wheels& hidden axle 574 Fuelling cams & lifters.J&M rocker series speakers & amp, Rb Racing black hole spyder 2-1, Aim-vpc92,SE 58MM TB, HPI 5.3 inj. Tuned by Strokerjlk 112.76/118.99 sae 115.42/121.85 std

Buckeye_Tuning

  • Mister Dick
  • Banned
  • Full CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 198
Re: Tuner for 2012 110 motor
« Reply #163 on: May 21, 2013, 02:10:37 PM »

HAHA.  I find the TTS the MOST user friendly.  And this is because of the software itself.  TTS software seems WAY more intuitive to me, once I got past what all the different things mean and do. What is hard is for folks to all learn what the different things mean and do.  TTS doesn't automate nor gloss over some of the things that a PV does.  That may make for the DIYer to tune 'easier', etc.  But doesn't make for the best acting software.  I have a 117 coming in with a PV to look at.  I am dreading it, having to look at that small display, working back and forth with the display and then the PC, etc.  TTS works smoother, for me, on a DIY OR a dyno.  But, the OP is only doing pipes, and I agree either would be good.
Logged
Never Ever Forget; Never Ever Forgive

Fattbaggernknox

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 162
Re: Tuner for 2012 110 motor
« Reply #164 on: May 21, 2013, 02:26:39 PM »

HAHA.  I find the TTS the MOST user friendly.  And this is because of the software itself.  TTS software seems WAY more intuitive to me, once I got past what all the different things mean and do. What is hard is for folks to all learn what the different things mean and do.  TTS doesn't automate nor gloss over some of the things that a PV does.  That may make for the DIYer to tune 'easier', etc.  But doesn't make for the best acting software.  I have a 117 coming in with a PV to look at.  I am dreading it, having to look at that small display, working back and forth with the display and then the PC, etc.  TTS works smoother, for me, on a DIY OR a dyno.  But, the OP is only doing pipes, and I agree either would be good.
  So your a tuner now?
Logged
2011 fltruse FBI wheels& hidden axle 574 Fuelling cams & lifters.J&M rocker series speakers & amp, Rb Racing black hole spyder 2-1, Aim-vpc92,SE 58MM TB, HPI 5.3 inj. Tuned by Strokerjlk 112.76/118.99 sae 115.42/121.85 std
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13
 

Page created in 0.198 seconds with 21 queries.