Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 54

Author Topic: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR  (Read 154174 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

naitram

  • SMF Administrator
  • 10K CVO Member
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12702
    • MA


    • CVO1: FLTRXSE2 "Marvin"
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #300 on: July 23, 2013, 08:22:50 PM »

most of you in this thread came from HTT or elsewhere with some existing history / feud / bad blood.

noone on CVOHARLEY really cares about any of this baggage you have only made a few posts here but you obviously know most of these peole already.

i'm not going to say this again if you guys have some bad history elsewhere keep it there.

you want to have a respectful discussion about this topic then please continue.

keep taking swipes at each other and you wont continue to be an active member here.
Logged
:cool26: naitram...


"I reject your reality and substitute my own."
"Work is the curse of the drinking class."

roger28310

  • Guest
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #301 on: July 23, 2013, 08:42:59 PM »

most of you in this thread came from HTT or elsewhere with some existing history / feud / bad blood.

noone on CVOHARLEY really cares about any of this baggage you have only made a few posts here but you obviously know most of these peole already.

i'm not going to say this again if you guys have some bad history elsewhere keep it there.

you want to have a respectful discussion about this topic then please continue.

keep taking swipes at each other and you wont continue to be an active member here.

If this is in response to my last post, please do not misinterpret my post or maybe I was just not clear. Was not taking a swipe at anyone, but asking a question which I think many members may have. I am not a member on any other forum. It just appears to me that this entire discussion is really a marketing ploy, but maybe not. I just don't know of how else to ask the question.  

Moderators: Please delete this or my previous post if you feel I am being out of line or even close to the line.                                                                                                                                                
« Last Edit: July 23, 2013, 09:06:41 PM by roger28310 »
Logged

Hilly13

  • Guest
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #302 on: July 23, 2013, 10:55:46 PM »

Mr Cole, will I need the the blue dongle for vtune3? I don't care if I do its just that if I do then I want it here when you release this so I can get straight into it.
Before anyone rags on about free upgrades or discounts that's NOT what I'm asking so please don't include me in that group, just want to be prepared is all.
Logged

SBB

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16404
  • Go fast or go home! EBCM member # 2.36 .01%
    • CVO2: 2011.5 SEUC
    • CVO3: 2012 SERG
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #303 on: July 23, 2013, 10:56:45 PM »

I have to interject something here as I have watched this same discussion on at least two different forums,

I am not a member on any other forum.                                                                                                                                              

Just wondering, was reading your last two post and you say you have watched this discussion on two other forums, then you say your not a member of on any other forum.
(yes I know to watch and be a member of a forum is two different things but)
I find these discussions interesting and I think most of the good members of CVOHarley are smart enough to sort through agenda's, marketing ploy's and personalities.


SBB


Logged

2012      SERG  "Nu Blue"
2018      Goldwing   
2003      HD Electra Glide Classic Silver and Black, of course!                
2 2012   Suzuki Burgmans
2018      Shelby GT350, 963 crank hp, 825 rear wheel hp

roger28310

  • Guest
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #304 on: July 23, 2013, 11:08:30 PM »

(yes I know to watch and be a member of a forum is two different things but)
I find these discussions interesting and I think most of the good members of CVOHarley are smart enough to sort through agenda's, marketing ploy's and personalities.

I watch a number of forums, to include some gun and bmw car forums as well. Will usually read more and post less. I too enjoy technical discussions, it's just the nature in which this thread was started. The OP obviously has a very close relationship with the vendor, and it appears he knew the answer (or at least the answer he wants to drive people to) when he started the thread asking for answers. Now it appears the vendor has been working on this for a while, aka his remark about the testing looking very good. So obviously something is not on the up and up with the OP and the TTS vendor.
Logged

SBB

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16404
  • Go fast or go home! EBCM member # 2.36 .01%
    • CVO2: 2011.5 SEUC
    • CVO3: 2012 SERG
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #305 on: July 23, 2013, 11:12:02 PM »

I watch a number of forums, to include some gun and bmw car forums as well. Will usually read more and post less. I too enjoy technical discussions, it's just the nature in which this thread was started. The OP obviously has a very close relationship with the vendor, and it appears he knew the answer (or at least the answer he wants to drive people to) when he started the thread asking for answers. Now it appears the vendor has been working on this for a while, aka his remark about the testing looking very good. So obviously something is not on the up and up with the OP and the TTS vendor.

You must have missed Naitram's post above,

most of you in this thread came from HTT or elsewhere with some existing history / feud / bad blood.

noone on CVOHARLEY really cares about any of this baggage you have only made a few posts here but you obviously know most of these peole already.

i'm not going to say this again if you guys have some bad history elsewhere keep it there.

you want to have a respectful discussion about this topic then please continue.

keep taking swipes at each other and you wont continue to be an active member here.


 :2vrolijk_21:

SBB




Logged

2012      SERG  "Nu Blue"
2018      Goldwing   
2003      HD Electra Glide Classic Silver and Black, of course!                
2 2012   Suzuki Burgmans
2018      Shelby GT350, 963 crank hp, 825 rear wheel hp

roger28310

  • Guest
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #306 on: July 23, 2013, 11:21:03 PM »

Nope. I saw it, but again, I don't feel I am taking a swipe at anyone, it is unfortunate that you feel that way. Just asking honest questions in the most respectful way I know how. And if the moderators feel I am out of line I am sure they will make an adjustment. I am confident that they can do that even without your help. But thank you.
Logged

FLTRI

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 418
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #307 on: July 24, 2013, 01:35:46 AM »

I have to interject something here as I have watched this same discussion on at least two different forums, and I can't help but notice that both threads were started by FLTRI and that he asked questions that he seemingly already knew the what he thought to be the answers. Almost as if FLTRI was trying to drum up discussion for the purpose of getting people interested in a new TTS product. Am I the only one that thinks that FLTRI already knew about the new features that Mr. Cole is referring to when he started these threads?
Drumming up discussion should be what these forums are for not drumming up conspiracy theories. :confused5:
I like and prefer TTS due to product features, flexibility, tech support.

As I've said in both forums, I used sensor voltage to keep a race engine @ 13.0 based on NBO2 sensor voltage way back in 1990. Crap, that was over 20 years ago! :o
You make whatever assumptions you want as to why TTS is building a tuning product based on sensor voltage output.

Steve Cole? Smart man with a great product that gets new features often to help tuners and DIYers as well. Could he have better forum skills? Absolutely! Me too!


My question was, and still is:
Can a DIYer use NBO2 sensor voltage output to target a given AFR so he could closed course tune his WOT?

Bob
Logged

mayor

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 215
  • just another fictional internet politician
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #308 on: July 24, 2013, 07:20:37 AM »

My question was, and still is:
Can a DIYer use NBO2 sensor voltage output to target a given AFR so he could closed course tune his WOT?
My answer was and still is: I haven't seen any documented proof to say yes to this yet.  I've seen several cases of showing a correlation between known samples with narrow band sensors and broad band sensors, but no case where a value was given and a DIY sent out on a mission to tune to that value....or even a case where beta software has been issued that would allow a DIY tuner to test a narrow band wide open tune.  Just on this forum alone, we have had two months worth of discusion...but none seems to be actually based on a DIY test. 
Logged

whittlebeast

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 269
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #309 on: July 24, 2013, 07:55:43 AM »

300 years ago almost all Americans lived in tents.  That was the best technology they had available to them at the time.  They also expected to die by age of 40.

I used to purchase piles of spark plugs and do plug cuts 20 years ago.   I use widebands, dataloggers and good software to tune now.  Typically, I am looking at a half a million data points at a time now and can now see issues just jump out an me.

Andy
Logged

sadunbar

  • 10K CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11416
  • EBCM # Stealth - SSBS # 1.1 - SoA # Z&E2525 .01%
    • IL


    • CVO1: 2007 FLHTCUSE2
    • CVO2: 2000 FXR4
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #310 on: July 24, 2013, 08:43:52 AM »

Nope. I saw it, but again, I don't feel I am taking a swipe at anyone, it is unfortunate that you feel that way. Just asking honest questions in the most respectful way I know how. And if the moderators feel I am out of line I am sure they will make an adjustment. I am confident that they can do that even without your help. But thank you.

This has been an interesting thread to read in spite of any perceived motives...  Any of us that have been around for any time at all know there is a close relationship between Bob and Steve.  So what?  It doesn't make the conversation any less interesting...

You've made your point and asked your question twice now.  After the first time, the owner of CVOHarley asked you to move on.  How much more of an invitation do you require?   :nixweiss:
Logged
2007 Screamin Eagle Ultra Classic - Light Candy Cherry and Black Ice
Screamin Eagle 120r
Revolution Performance EMS
Fuel Moto Jackpot headpipes and 4.5" Pro Touring Mufflers
HPI 55mm Throttle Body w/5.3 injectors
BDL clutch w/VPC92T
Traxxion AK-20
Legend Air Suspension
Brembo Brake Calipers/Rotors
Garmin Zumo
575 Chubby's
Bushtec Quantum

Buckeye_Tuning

  • Mister Dick
  • Banned
  • Full CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 198
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #311 on: July 24, 2013, 10:39:21 AM »

Some simply do NOT understand what is truly going on with these threads.  Let's keep the 'other' forum over there.  New guy sounds like ANOTHER Steve hater to me.  Sounds like Stroker sent another fanboi over here.  Inject PV into this thread and then say it is so cool, too.  How is THAT furthering a thread?

Here is THE deal.  Steve has the product done.  It will be released.  It works.

Now, what I feel Bob has been trying to do is get folks involved that are not so closely attached to TTS to run some 'experiments'.  The true reason for these experiments is NO ONE will believe that one can use NB O2s to gather WOT info, the same as we now use WBs.  The idea here is for some folks to change their minds, from looking at data, that.... hmmmmmm... those damn narrow bands CAN be used in this manner.

What MOST still think is at 100kpa, that these sendsors are being used similar to fuel control.  They are not being used in this manner.  ARe the narrow bands suspect for 100kpa data gathering...  presently the answer is yes, they are suspect.  What most are simply failing to realize is the fuel lines we graph from using widebands on a sweep, are suspect, also.  But... since that is the ONLY thing we have, we have all convinced ourselves the WBos are dead nuts 'on', and that really is simply not the case.  Most do not 'get this' fully.

So, here we are.  I HAVE done these tests and can keep my fuel line withing less than a 1/2 AFR line, by using voltages.  I sweep WOT.  I normally use WBos and make multiple runs and dial in the VEs to get the fuel line flat at target.  I can do the same with the NBs.  ANd... the fuel lines are really quite close.

Here is what you are missing Mike...  this is done.  This is software driven.  A bike owner will NOT have to manually alter VEs, like with a sweep, it does it autaomatically, just like Timing Assist does and just like the VEs are done... automated software.

These threads, from Bob, and YES, they and now I have seen this work, we KNOW it works.  It is NOT a vendor pushing a product, it is all about changing the mind sets of some who refuse to believe that WBs have issues.

Those of us that tune, know some of the issues.  Biggest issue I have seen, even on a WOT run, low RPM will NOT gather nice data with WBos.  But we all get it done, right?  Same thing on the other end.

Since other 'members' come here with graphs, etc, but readily admit they haven't touched a bike in years... what does THAT add to the discussion.

This EXISTS.  This will be sold.  Members here will be able to tune their 100kpa areas, using DIY methods.  Those are the FACTS.

ANd when this is through testing and released, I will simply sit by, use this to tune with, and watch all of the HATERS argue it doesn't 'work'.  My response will be to anyone, when you use this... then use your dyno and sweep you some fuel, and compare the end results of where the VES are.

I am like Sadunbar, I find this highly interesting.  Time marches onwards.  New things are discovered.  New things make it to market.  Things ALWAYS change.  In 2007, there were NO tuners that allowed a tuner/DIYer to use the O2 sensors on a bike to tune with.  TTS made this, and everyone copied.  TTS made a tuner that can pull out EGR using software, then everyone copied.  TTS made a tuner that adjusts for cam opening, then folks are copying that right now.  SESPT uses 100kpa to tune with RIGHT NOW, and NOBODY says its bullchit.  It is only when TTS does the same thing, that is when people scream.  Most of us readily know the limitations of the SESPT, magically changes timing, etc.  So now that TTS copies, AND fixes these things...  it is now bullchit?  I ain't buying it.  What I AM buying is there are LOTS of folks that have vested interests in the status quo.   

Tuning... cars, trucks and bikes is a business category that is full of small businesses.  Some may have 100 employees, so that is STILL a small business.  Folks wish to protect their turf.  The BIG BUSINESS end of tuning is Bosch and NGK (owner of NTK).  I doubt NTK and Bosch give a crap.  But all of the wide band tuning guys WILL.  It will be very heated as this moves forward... the reason will be simple, too.  The car market.  If this was ONLY about bikes?  No one would care and pat Steve on the back.  But cars?  Now there is THE market, and what happens if this works for bikes?  Then it will work for cars, too.  ANd then everything changes.

So, the haters can run their ringers in this thread all they wish, time WILL move forward regardless.
Logged
Never Ever Forget; Never Ever Forgive

ultraswede

  • Guest
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #312 on: July 24, 2013, 11:01:01 AM »

I agree with your post buckeye


except;

Quote
Then it will work for cars, too.  ANd then everything changes.

Well, for cars and trucks we have already had WOT CL NB tuning for many years.
CL NB tuning works fine in water cooled cars/trucks. (wont melt down at stoic/CL at WOT)
Populate VE @ stoic/CL, then change to what ever AFR we want.
(have been using hptuners)
Logged

whittlebeast

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 269
Logged

FLTRI

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 418
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #314 on: July 24, 2013, 12:12:56 PM »

300 years ago almost all Americans lived in tents.  That was the best technology they had available to them at the time.  They also expected to die by age of 40.

I used to purchase piles of spark plugs and do plug cuts 20 years ago.   I use widebands, dataloggers and good software to tune now.  Typically, I am looking at a half a million data points at a time now and can now see issues just jump out an me.

Andy
Again, the OP is all about if DIYers,can use the NBO2 sensors to target their WOT portion of their tune. Nothing more and nothing less.

How have you addressed the post #188 results? Think it was done with smoke and mirrors?
There are a couple other posts that show AFR/voltage correlation but I don't think the posters believe their own data. Lol

Bob
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 54
 

Page created in 0.261 seconds with 25 queries.