Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[whittlebeast]

.....assuming sketchy is good enough.

[FLTRI]

Got any data to support that statement? Opinions are plentiful.
Supporting data from Mayor, Joe, and others say its much better than "sketchy".
Bob

[whittlebeast]

Post up plenty of data and lets take a look.

[FLTRI]

Post up plenty of data and lets take a look.

Did you look at the data hrdtail78 posted?
Have you used the TTS scatter plots?
Bob

[whittlebeast]

Did you look at the data hrdtail78 posted?
Have you used the TTS scatter plots?
Bob

yes and yes.  it was just idle.

[Hilly13]

  again and again and again and again 
Its a yes from me and now I wait for someone to show me how I can reasonably do it as a diy type.
Maybe a new thread for that as this one is longwinded to say the least.

[FLTRI]

Maybe a new thread for that as this one is longwinded to say the least.

Looks like we may be ready for that.
Bob

[hrdtail78]

yes and yes.  it was just idle.

If you promise to quit trolling this thread and start your own about scatter graphs. I'll post up some 20 minute data logs of generic O2.   Do you want CAN or 1850?  Map or TPS based VE's.  Its the end of a long work week. So it won't happen until next week.

[FLTRI]

If you promise to quit trolling this thread and start your own about scatter graphs. I'll post up some 20 minute data logs of generic O2.   Do you want CAN or 1850?  Map or TPS based VE's.  Its the end of a long work week. So it won't happen until next week.

Thank you Jason!
Bob

[whittlebeast]

When did disagreeing with conviction on an open forum become trolling?

When did asking a yes or no question and only taking a "yes" as the only acceptable answer considered not trolling?

Andy

[Steve Cole]

When did disagreeing with conviction on an open forum become trolling?

When did asking a yes or no question and only taking a "yes" as the only acceptable answer considered not trolling?

Andy

IMHO you have done nothing about what the OP was all about. The OP was and is about using NB O2's for WOT for the DIY person. The question was asked for DATA to compare a NB O2 and BB O2 under real conditions in a HD engine. You have provided none of the asked for information but repeatedly tried to change the OP. You want to talk about your belief's about MLVHD and megasquirt it should be a different post all together.

That is considered by most people to be trolling.

[whittlebeast]

I have repeatedly asked for data of a bike running in this operating range to look at and you and most all of your friends have refused to produce data feeds off your very own system.  That in itself throws up the red flag.

Andy

[Steve Cole]

I have repeatedly asked for data of a bike running in this operating range to look at and you and most all of your friends have refused to produce data feeds off your very own system.  That in itself throws up the red flag.

Andy

You've claimed repeatedly that you've tuned HD engines. So why would anyone have to supply you with the data? You would have it already if you've done as you have claimed. The OP was clearly asking for data to be provided by others or did you just not read that part. There was no request in the OP for anything other than to look at the output from the NB and determine if that data could be used by the DIY to give themselves a good safe tune under WOT conditions on there HD engine. No one ever asked about a race car or scatter graphs!

[whittlebeast]

Why are you so reluctant to allow any of your buddys to post data logs?

[Fired00d]

 

 
Ride Safe,
Fired00d