Why no Amsoil? Unacceptable viscosity breakdown.
Let's dig into this a little more. First, the oil actually got thicker (higher viscosity), as shown by the UOAs in your later post, so there wasn't any viscosity breakdown. In fact, the lab report, in Comments, notes the increased viscosity,
as expected in this type of engine. In addition, there is no increase in wear metals, as might be seen in viscosity breakdown. The insolubles (sludge) are within normal limits.
What you have here is an oil that is doing its job well, and getting "sludgy" as expected--exactly why we change the oil at a certain mileage.
Of course, you won't go wrong with Mobil 1 V-Twin, which ranked right up there with Amsoil.

to both of them.
The link in post #12, by GRC, discusses the methods and reasons behind the tests, and really helps to understand the results.
One more thing: When I change to a different oil, I always send in a sample of the unused new oil, along with the sample of the old used oil from the bike. That way, I see the values of the new stuff before it gets worn-out by the bike, as well as the previous oil's performance.