Evening Update; Going to 117"
After being told by the
Manufacturer to run the rings that were .003-.004 > spec, the guys at Oasis & Revolution offered to give me a set of new Revolution 4.060 Nicasil Cylinders, Pistons & Rings, 'thought for a second, called back, and asked why not 117~ 4.125? if I pay for the case boring and the Cylinder Mid Bolt Kit? Oasis said sure!!!

(aarrggghhh! will "the may as well, while we're in there" ever stop??? The CVO Forum has taken it's toll on my credit card

'Thinking about cams with less low end, and more top end (3k - 6k) than the T-Man 625s, since we are going to naturally gain TQ w/ the increased displacement, and have the lower ratios of the DD7. To better understand; I really preferred the "softer" bottom end of the 259s compared to the "tractor motor" with the stock 255s, especially in the low speed, tight, off camber roads that we encountered on the West Coast. Being "softer" on the bottom, it was easier for me to modulate the TBW. And we really enjoyed the "top gear roll-on" from 90+ w/ the 259s
'Just want to keep the compression low enough to accommodate the touring out West.
Definitely goin' to need more clutch now
For any of y'all still following this thread,
I would really appreciate any input, good, bad, or ugly, on this scenario!! Thanks to All,
(Especially Oasis, for their
"Yes we are building a piano" mentality)

Ed