I always kept the release as far out as possible on my cable operated bikes, to keep from having to pull it very far in when shifting quick. So when I got the first hydraulic clutch and it released at approx 90% of the travel I was happy. But in the 11 years since then I hear constantly from people who have just experienced there first hydraulic clutch how they are going to have to have the clutch adjusted soon and then they think you are crazy when you tell them it does not have any adjustment.
I like it out and think most folks get used to it after awhile and just adjust themselves vs an adjustable clutch. I have never understood why anyone wants it to release closer to grip, but apparently to each his own.
I'm used to a proper clutch having the friction zone right in the middle of lever travel and be fully engaged at say 75-80% ( maybe a sense of security from the old days, when rotation of the handlebars made a difference in freeplay / adjustment of the Clutch and Throttle, an assurance that the clutch was fully engaged

) with the juice Clutches and TBW the handlebar rotation is no longer in play...
All my HDs (1 cable, 2 hyd) have the friction zone slap in the middle of lever travel, but after putting >500mi. on Unbalanced'd Monster 131 Pumpkin, with the friction zone in the last 30% of lever travel, I wholeheartedly agree with you! a potential side benefit could be a more complete release, less clunk going into 1st??
(Note that Unbalanced'd Pumpkin, has 0 slip, toting the front tire in the first 3 gears with ease

, spinning the rear at 50 mph

, and consistently the quietest shift into 1st of any HD I have ridden)
Again, I agree, as long as the Clutch is getting full engagement, no slip, and a suitable friction zone, I see no downside to engagement at the end of lever travel...
JMHO, your results may vary...