If the folks at CNA don't understand a proper tune (let's assume stock motor, pipes etc.) will let the motor run cooler reducing the possibility of pistons, valves, guides, etc. failing sooner, then I'm glad I didn't purchase the ESP on my Roadglide a few weeks ago. I did purchase the ESP on the CVO King I got in May, so maybe I wasted some $$$. Being the factory warranty is still in effect maybe I'll see if I can backout. I know the service guys pretty well, ask if CNA is changing it's methods of claim acceptance. Good discussion here.
Proper Tune....... What constitutes a proper tune and who’s the arbiter of that?
If an owner installs a V&H Fuel Pak and picks their own Fuel Pak map. Is that considered proper tune for their bike?
How about if they buy a PV, TTS or SEPST and flash a canned base map or tune it themselves using Vtune or Smart Tune; is that a proper tune for their bike?
What about the owner installing a Thundermax or Daytona Twin Tec, making their own selection of a base map and settings and then riding it around auto tuning the AFR while adjusting the timing to stop the ping or increase power; is that a proper tune?
What if they take their PV, TTS, SEPST, ThunderMax, etc to a shop with a dyno and have it tuned. Are they getting a proper tune then? Personally I think there are more shops pumping out bad tunes than there are good ones by a large margin.
How about if the owner actually had a proper tune (or unaware second owner) and then decided to change the Exhaust, Air Cleaner or other parts without getting it re-tuned because it seems to still run good yet?
What about the aftermarket performance parts that are being installed as well. There are thousands of parts that can be installed in millions of combinations. Are all of these well engineered, quality components that work well together to make the bike more reliable and run better?
What the ESP administrator (CNA) understands is risk management. A factory stock bike statistically has a lower risk of requiring repairs than a bike that has been modified. If it was the other way around, they wouldn’t provide coverage for factory stock bikes and instead sell service contracts for bikes that were modified. They are in the business of making money. If you want an assurance that they will not deny a claim or terminate your contract, then leave the bike stock and abide by the terms of the contract.
While I may believe that the modifications I’ve made to my bike have improved its reliability and performance, that doesn’t make it so (Who the heck am I to say so). When I choose to modify my bike, I am choosing to have the responsibility, risk, costs and consequences associated to that decision assigned to me. I’m not going to get angry or upset with the ESP administrator, MoCo or the dealer for my choice if they then choose not to pay for repairs that may later result from that choice.
You can discuss with your dealer. Even if they tell you that it’s not a concern, that they know how to work with ESP, and that they generally never have any problems; I’m certain that they will not pay your repair bill for you in the event that ESP denies your claim or terminates your contract.