And my very efficient and pretty wiring to my tour pak;
Mrs We all the ugly chrome on the pipes at least gives the dealer an option of (rightly or wrongly) claiming a manufacturer's problem in production. But that wiring mess is just... well, I don't even know what to call it.
They weren't anything but completely incredibly lazy. It's just not a big deal to run that down beneath the strut and leave the excess curled up beneath the seat (if they're too lazy to shorten it to fit). There's no good reason for a Harley shop to knowingly do such ugly work on any bike. That they'd do it on the most expensive bike they sell and whose cachet is based at least partly on it's looks is just mind numbing.
They had to have been hit with a dumb stick, the dumb stick broke open their dumb skull, and they apparently thought it was then fun to roll around in their own dumb blood reinfecting the wound with greater degrees and new generations of dumbness.
The only thing your pictures illustrate even more than dumb is lazy. It's just too obvious that all they cared about was hooking it up and getting it out the door. The attitude once gone in a shop like that is pre-programmed to be "we won't have to worry about it."
Just for comparison here's my red bike with the harness run beneath the strut and the ties pulled around the strut but not around the covers. It would have only taken three or four minutes longer to do this rather than what they did. But because they were dumb (dumb AND lazy) they just didn't mess with it.
It's embarassing to think we (all of us) are represented by someone that is going to shove work like that out the door. It's frightening to think that the manufacturer would either let it stand once notified or so incredibly slothful in its response that satisfaction wasn't ordered in something less than an engine's revolution.