Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Birdman]

Those numbers sound great   I have the power duals and PC-V on order.  I currently have Rush 2.25 slipons  I am curious as to what number I am going to get without doing the cams. 

[twmartin1970]

Here is the dyno sheet from my run.  I think the torque curve looks great.  I couldn't be more pleased.

I was wrong on the cams installed.  They are Woods TW7H, not the TW6-6.

Haven't gotten a chance to ride it because of the storms.  Hopefully I can get pictures of the bike with the new exhaust tomorrow.

[1abastarsmda]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote from: twmartin1970 on February 19, 2009, 10:42:41 AM
I will be installing the TW6-6 cam.


That's the one I was looking at...TW-7H.  It looks like the main difference is the lift and I would have to go with hi-lift springs to put this one in. 

Back to where we were a week or so ago, that's a higher lift cam and they recommend hi-lift springs.  Did you have that done also?  When I saw that numbers you were posting, thinking it was the TW6-6, I thought there was no need to go to the TW-7H if you could get this out of the TW6-6.  Now, I'm not so surprised with the results.  That was the reason I wanted to go with the TW-7H in the first place.  But I'm still curious whether you need to go with the hi-lift springs and I assume they changed the push rods also.  Anything else?

[twmartin1970]

They only changed the pushrods.  The stock springs worked.

[twmartin1970]

Still a nasty day here, but I was able to put a few miles on the bike.  The bike runs great.  Has really good power. 

Here is a picture of the power duals on the bike.

[1abastarsmda]

Still a nasty day here, but I was able to put a few miles on the bike.  The bike runs great.  Has really good power. 

Here is a picture of the power duals on the bike.

That is one funky looking exhaust system.  It does have a different look to it than seeing just partial pictures on their website.  Is the pipe that runs under the bike flattened out like the stock pipe or did they leave it rounded?  Anyway, just how much seat of the pants difference is there now with that cam in there?  Is it a totally overwhelming difference, or more of a definitely more pull, but not of mindblowing proportions?

[twmartin1970]

The exhaust is different looking, but I don't think it looks that bad.  I wouldn't want to lose the performance using true duals, and I don't like the idea of a falsie on the left side.  (I ran a fatcat on my last bike which I really liked.)  I still feel like these power duals or Steve's stock pipe modification are our best options.  I had already ordered these before I saw Steve's modifications.  I don't want to cut up the stock pipe yet.

The pipe going under the bike has a small notch in it.  Otherwise it is round.  Doesn't look that restrictive.

Seat of the pants wise, it definitly pulls longer.  I felt like the bike fell on it's face around 3500 rpms.  I can definitely tell a big difference.

I don't think I would call it mind blowing, but I woul definitely do it again.

[1abastarsmda]

The exhaust is different looking, but I don't think it looks that bad.  I wouldn't want to lose the performance using true duals, and I don't like the idea of a falsie on the left side.  (I ran a fatcat on my last bike which I really liked.)  I still feel like these power duals or Steve's stock pipe modification are our best options.  I had already ordered these before I saw Steve's modifications.  I don't want to cut up the stock pipe yet.

The pipe going under the bike has a small notch in it.  Otherwise it is round.  Doesn't look that restrictive.

Seat of the pants wise, it definitly pulls longer.  I felt like the bike fell on it's face around 3500 rpms.  I can definitely tell a big difference.

I don't think I would call it mind blowing, but I woul definitely do it again.

I agree 100% that the true duals didn't make sense.  I decided on the third option, the Fatcat, and I'm going to see if I can live without the ghost pipe for now.  It should make cleaning the left side of the rear wheel easier without a pipe there.  That, in itself, may be enough incentive for me to leave the pipe off the left side.

[twmartin1970]

If my bike didn't have the bag extensions, I would have bought the fatcat.  Doesn't look the greatest from a symetry standpoint, but the performance was very good.  I got used to the look on my Street Glide.

[09S/E roadglide]

I think those look great ! They look alot thicker or is it just me? Hows the sound with that header ? This is what the pipe looks like on my King so thats awseome. EXACTLY what I was hoping for. Thanks for the pics. OH almost forgot.....I couldnt find specs on that cam. Whats the lift and your guy said its not too much for the stock heads ?  Thanks Rick

[1abastarsmda]

I think those look great ! They look alot thicker or is it just me? Hows the sound with that header ? This is what the pipe looks like on my King so thats awseome. EXACTLY what I was hoping for. Thanks for the pics. OH almost forgot.....I couldnt find specs on that cam. Whats the lift and your guy said its not too much for the stock heads ?  Thanks Rick

The cam he got is the TW-7H.  Here is the spec sheet for that series of Woods Cams

[09S/E roadglide]

Thats a nice cam.... I like the power it makes.

[twmartin1970]

The cams work very well in the 110.

[1abastarsmda]

The cams work very well in the 110.

Those aren't the stock handlebars, are they?

[twmartin1970]

Those aren't the stock handlebars, are they?

No, they are Paul Yaffe OEM Monkey Bars.  I think they really make the bike.  They are very comfortable also.