Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 43 44 [45] 46 47 ... 54

Author Topic: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR  (Read 153607 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

hrdtail78

  • Vendor
  • Elite CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 762
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #660 on: August 19, 2013, 08:49:22 PM »

Thanks,  wasn't being smart. Just wondering so we can all be on the same page.
Logged

joe_lyons50023

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 179
Re: Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #661 on: August 19, 2013, 09:13:48 PM »

Map load normalization, closed loop range, and O2 sensor bias control are a few that I can remember but I'm not in front of my computer right now.
Logged

98fxstc

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 200
  • 09 FXDFSE
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #662 on: August 19, 2013, 09:14:49 PM »

quote author=Buckeye_Tuning link=topic=85929.msg1164775#msg1164775 date=1376949554]
I do NOT know who, in this thread, started out or still is a DIYer.  I know Mayor and I did for sure.  AFter a point, even a dedicated DIYer will gather new tools to further the education one needs, right?  [/quote]

I think you have a lot of interested DIY'ers looking on and interested in learning.
Look at the number of views !

Keep at it fellas!
Logged

joe_lyons50023

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 179
Re: Re: Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #663 on: August 19, 2013, 09:55:23 PM »

What tuning "field" available in PV is not available in TTS or D/L?
Bob
Bob is that a hint of sarcasm?  Well hell I thing tuning fields works.
Logged

Steve Cole

  • Manufacturer TTS
  • 1K CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1430
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #664 on: August 19, 2013, 10:16:11 PM »

So have we given up the idea of the OP?


2014 models released

XL has new CAN buss
Touring has newCAN buss
Softail and Dyna same as 2012- 2013
Vrod has old J1850 still

No 96 BT anymore and it looks like the 255 cam may be in all the water cooled 103's
« Last Edit: August 19, 2013, 10:18:30 PM by Steve Cole »
Logged
The Best you know, is the Best you've had........ not necessarily the Best.

hrdtail78

  • Vendor
  • Elite CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 762
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #665 on: August 19, 2013, 10:23:52 PM »

Map load normalization, closed loop range, and O2 sensor bias control are a few that I can remember but I'm not in front of my computer right now.

Is there anywhere in that program that tells you what each table does like in TTS?  I know there is new stuff coming with vision all the time. I figured it wasn't used much. I don't hear anything about them. Kind of like TPS baro correction. I use it and I have talked to other tuners about it, and that's it.
Logged

joe_lyons50023

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 179
Re: Re: Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #666 on: August 19, 2013, 11:14:28 PM »

So have we given up the idea of the OP?


2014 models released

XL has new CAN buss
Touring has newCAN buss
Softail and Dyna same as 2012- 2013
Vrod has old J1850 still

No 96 BT anymore and it looks like the 255 cam may be in all the water cooled 103's
There not 255 but just opened the intake to 3° btdc and exhaust some more to create overlap but I still think that its the same lift.
Logged

joe_lyons50023

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 179
Re: Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #667 on: August 19, 2013, 11:23:32 PM »







VS.


Logged

joe_lyons50023

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 179
Re: Re: Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #668 on: August 19, 2013, 11:29:57 PM »

Is there anywhere in that program that tells you what each table does like in TTS?  I know there is new stuff coming with vision all the time. I figured it wasn't used much. I don't hear anything about them. Kind of like TPS baro correction. I use it and I have talked to other tuners about it, and that's it.


This can help those guys out in Denver that never see more than 80ish kpa.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2013, 11:32:56 PM by joe_lyons50023 »
Logged

North Georgia Hawg

  • HoneyBadger Don't Care...
  • 2.5K CVO Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3345
  • I HATE WINTER!!!
    • GA


    • CVO1: 2012 CVO Street Glide FLHXSE3 Hot Citrus/Antique Gunstock
    • CVO2: 2022 C8 Corvette HTC Amplify Orange
    • CVO3: 2009 Chevy Avalanche LTZ Inferno Orange
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #669 on: August 20, 2013, 12:25:24 AM »

So have we given up the idea of the OP?


2014 models released

XL has new CAN buss
Touring has newCAN buss
Softail and Dyna same as 2012- 2013
Vrod has old J1850 still

No 96 BT anymore and it looks like the 255 cam may be in all the water cooled 103's


Steve - 3750 max torque for the '14 CVO Limited? I don't see how the SE 255's 211 intake duration can produce max TQ at that high RPM. If it does, that's a pretty damned peaky TQ curve! The 255 is all in by 4400 RPM.

Do you think they're FINALLY using a better cam in the '14s?

ALSO... Will this senseless thread EVER end?

Ken
Logged

HoneyBadger Don't Care...

Cobra PowerPort headers | 4" Rineharts | RedShift 587 cams | Feuling HP+ cam plate/oil pump/pushrods/lifters
Cometic MLS .030" gaskets | Big Sucker Stage 2 | Energy One extra plate clutch pack | Hayden BT07 | ClutchWIZ
TL P7 LEDs/Aux | Color-Matched Tour Pak | Wild Ones 575 bars | RT 665 GPS
Corbin DualTour seat | BAH Flush Front Axle

whittlebeast

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 269
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #670 on: August 20, 2013, 06:43:17 AM »

Joe, those "fields" shown in Power Vision are what I used to refer to as the "Harley Hidden Tables".

Have fun tuning

Andy
Logged

joe_lyons50023

  • Full CVO Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 179
Re: Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #671 on: August 20, 2013, 08:56:39 AM »

OK so instead of "fields" I should have said "tables". My bad
Logged

hrdtail78

  • Vendor
  • Elite CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 762
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #672 on: August 20, 2013, 09:39:39 AM »

Andy

Then every tuning device has hidden tables.  Not one of them out there gives you access to the whole ECM.   Some people just like to spin things differently.  I thought you were talking about hidden data. Not tables.  Changing things up to suit you?

Joe,

Seem to me that most of the tables are the same in the 2 systems. Just called different names.
Logged

whittlebeast

  • Senior CVO Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 269
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #673 on: August 20, 2013, 10:43:25 AM »

Megasquirt exposes everything.  I would not advise that option for this group.

I have always wanted to see everything exposed that the factory/software companies typically use to change one "base tune" to a different "base tune".

Andy
Logged

hrdtail78

  • Vendor
  • Elite CVO Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 762
Re: O2 Sensor Output (mv) compared to measured AFR
« Reply #674 on: August 20, 2013, 10:47:09 AM »

Does mega squirt work with the HD Delphi fuel injection system?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 43 44 [45] 46 47 ... 54
 

Page created in 0.218 seconds with 21 queries.