Hoist, yea been checking into the cam thing since I got the bike. Even talked to Bob Woods. Problem is no one at that time had a bolt in cam for the 110. That is, no one had done a valve overlap clearance or valve/piston clearance and Bob mentioned the ole 110's rocker box clearance problems. If you have heard otherwise, please enlighten me. I don't have the time myself and am not ready to pay to have the heads pulled and the clearances tested. The stock lift is marginal but the intake and exhaust duration is just plain pitiful. I know, I am just lazy, gotta learn to shift @ higher rpm's too, just getting too old to see the tach and the road at the same time at full throttle over 100mph
Hey Trapper, I would clearance the rocker boxes anyway, even with the stock cams. So that point is moot. At this point I wouldn't go too radical anyway, considering all the issues with the 110 engines. Also, I would stay away from the gear drive for now, due to excessive crank runout issues. So, what's the alternative, you ask? Ghost Rider has a SERK3 with SE
210 251 cams. I rode (beat on) it last week!

The bike runs really good and it expands the RPM range to 2000-5500. It gives good usable power throughout that RPM range. I wouldn't say it's much stronger than the stock SE 255, but that cam is limited to 3000-4500 RPM range. I like the idea of having the entire power band at my disposal. He also gets 20-25 percent better fuel mileage than me, because you can cruise at lower RPM. I think it's a good compromise for now. And it should also get the bike up over 130MPH (to stay on topic

). That cam seems very well matched to the 110 and doesn't impose any more stress to the engine than the stock cam.
Hoist!
