Having experienced this, and then having an opportunity to speak with the President of CNA Warranty Company (I'm an Insurance Agent and know the CEO of CNA) about my experience on this, I still believe I would purchase the warranty on the bike. I agree with much of what has been said, and like I told CNA's President, I have several concerns about the contract and enforcing the contract given the relationship with the dealers that everyone knows is going on. It seems counter intuitive, but in my case, even with the modifications, I was able to get coverage and will basically pay for my new S&S motor after selling the rebuilt 110 this spring. So using the gambling analogy, is it worth the $ to get some coverage, or keeping the money and having no coverage? That's what makes gambling fun

Harley is not the culprit and CNA is not the culprit, if that were the case, then I wouldn't have the same decision to make on my Ford F250, BMW, Nissan, Mastercraft, Ski Doo's, Sea Doo's, and Yamaha! Stuff breaks, and you have to decide on how you want to deal with it. My concerns earlier, and my discussion with CNA, was that the Dealer needs to do a better job of helping the consumer understand what voids the warranty, and how and where the warranty provides coverage (see adding a plow to your Ford truck), and then let the consumer decide. Ford doesn't make bad trucks, and BMW makes awesome cars; they just have to draw the line somewhere.
Bottom line is that the warranty is a good deal if you use it, and not a good deal if you don't or modify your bike to the point where it voids the warranty. Everyone has to figure that out on their own.
